Wellington [change] Weather home
 
16°C Max: 17°C
Min: 11°C
Full forecast

Smacking petition falls short

Last updated 11:45 29/04/2008

Relevant offers

Organisers of a petition to force a smacking referendum have been dealt a major blow after failing to gather enough signatures.

They now have two more months to collect enough signatures.

The petition needed 280,275 signatures to force a referendum but fell short after a number were excluded because they were either illegible, the signatory's date of birth could not be confirmed, or involved people who signed multiple times.

In a statement, the Office of the Clerk said an audit of signatures found that no more than 269,500 were eligible. That is a shortfall of about 15,500 signatures.

Family First spokesman Bob McCroskie appeared confident that any shortfall would easily be made up in the two months available.

He said politicians should respond now, not after the election, to the wishes of parents.

"The passing of the anti-smacking law by most of our politicians last year was an act of breathtaking arrogance which ignored the wishes of the very people who elected them to represent them in the making of our laws."

The petition by Sheryl Savill asked: "Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?"

If the organisers succeed in collecting the signatures of 10 per cent of eligible electors they will be able to force a referendum at the next election, though its results will be non-binding.

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

115 comments
Johnny   #115   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

"The smacking bill has been in for a while, and that hasn't stopped parents from putting kids in clothes driers, has it?!"

... well, must be time to legalise murder and theft then, since making them illegal hasn't seemed to stop them happening ...

If you have evidence that the tally has been added up incorrectly Colin, perhaps you should put it out there for everyone else to see? Unless, of course, you're just making wild accusations without any basis??

Tania   #114   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Again, where can we sign this petition?

jaimee blythe   #113   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Where do I sign aswell

Sam Smith   #112   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

You really have to laugh at comments like this and other similar comments from other non-parents.

Parents are never going risk smacking a child even if it would stop them endangering themself or another child for fear the it could go to court. I know the police or court would accept this as being justified, but no parent wants their family to go through this process.

You think about the situation where a child goes to kindy or school and says Mum or Dad smacked me. The teacher would need to report this as it would be irresponsible for them to make a decision as to how serious the smack was (the teacher could not risk the chance this is a serious situation).

Perhaps you might like to also think about a situation where a child is throwing stones at cars. Of course parents are going to talk to their children about this and explain why this is so dangerous. You think about how you would address it if they continued to do it... Then instead think about if the second time the child threw stones at a car it broke the windscreen and kills the driver - sometimes you have limited chances to correct behaviour.

Sign the petition.

Janine   #111   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Clearly NO ONE actually gets what the bill is about and it apears that NZ has fallen victim to gross mis information. This is not an issue of wether you have the right to disapline your child reasonably or the government controlling your life. This is about the much bigger picture of NZ's gross and disgraceful culture of violence. We have a domestic abuse problem. Everyday i read about all the children who are killed in NZ and then i read about all the people who sign this petition to remove the bill that could actually make headway into changing that culture. It's not about you - it's about our future as a nation and it's childrens rights to have a chance at an abuse free life.

You need to read betweeen the lines of this bill and see the effects it can have on the real victims and criminals.

The effects of such bills are never immediate but they do change culture over time.

Juan   #110   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Yeah, I'd sign this. That way when the referendum comes around we can populate the "Oddly Enough/Weird 'n'Wacky" news columns of websites around the world as we vote on whether or not we should be able to hit our children legally.

About time we get our 15 minutes of fame, right?

susan   #109   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Please... this was NEVER an anti-smacking law - it is the removal of an old law which allows the use of force against a child. The laws governing abuse of women and animals were removed years ago. Would you like to reintroduce them as well?? This private members bill was to remove statute 59 - that's all

Greg   #108   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

If you are beating your kids enough to be prosecuted in the first place(the requirements for this have not changed), then you deserve to be convicted for it.

The only change in the bill is to remove a defence for abuse which was a very grey, and very broad, that allowed actual child abusers to get off charges.

Anyone complaining about this bill - how often have you had the police knocking on your door for discipling your kids? Never? Well done. This law won't affect your life at all.

Kate   #107   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

If you bothered to educate yourself about the law, you would find that the one exception is when stopping the child from endangering themselves - I'm no lawyer but grabbing them and pulling them away from a jug of water or hot iron would probably come under this

Under your argument here, it would probably be more of a learning experience for the child to let them touch the iron and therefore let them associate touching hot irons with "bad things" happening. Of course instead you could take the time and effort to explain the concept to them without any harm coming to them at all.

Kath   #106   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

For more info, I found the following web site / link.

http://www.familyfirst.org.nz/index.cfm/SIGN_THE_PETITIONS


Show 56-105 of 115 comments
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Sorry I called you a clown - Tom Scott

Cartoon of the day

Sorry I called you a clown - Tom Scott

Voyages blog pointer small

Blog: US/NZ - a cultural conversation

The changing ways we keep in touch

On the Box blog pointer small

On the Box: What's on TV with Chris Philpott

How many chances for Once Upon a Time?

All you need to know about what's happening in Auckland now

Auckland news, sport, entertainment and more

All you need to know about what's happening in Auckland now

What do the stars have in store for you today?

Horoscopes

What do the stars have in store for you today?

Test your knowledge with our daily crossword

Crosswords

Test your knowledge with our daily crossword

sudoku

Sudoku

Rev up your mind with our numbers game