Rigor on the run out: Beware casting stones
Relevant offers
Mark Richardson has warned against self-righteousness in the wake of this morning's run out furore, dredging up a less than gentlemanly incident from the Black Caps' past.
The former New Zealand opener called this morning's controversial ODI match collision between Grant Elliott and Ryan Sidebottom "harmless".
After watching this morning's highlights, Richardson - whose lack of athleticism earned him the nickname 'Rigor', abbreviated from rigormortis - said the umpire's call was 50/50.
Tension erupted after Black Cap all-rounder Elliott was run out for 24 after colliding with England bowler Sidebottom when attempting a short single. England captain Paul Collingwood refused to withdraw the appeal, generating a disgusted reaction from the Kiwis from the team balcony. A subsequent handshake and apology between captains quelled tensions.
Commenting on the controversy today, Richardson said: "It appeared to me Sidebottom was going for the ball, and the collision was probably harmless.
"Elliott had the right to keep going, although the onus is still on the batsman to get out of the way so long as the bowler isn't going out of his way to make sure the batsman is held up.
"The umpire made the decision, and that should be respected."
"Collingwood could have said it was an unfair call, but he was in his rights to throw it over to the umpires.
"It's not like the players make the rules - they don't give themselves out, the umpires are there to do that."
Richardson said New Zealand should be careful about "throwing stones" and being hypocritical.
He said the incident was similar to when Sri Lanka's Muralitharan was run out during last year's tour to New Zealand.
Muralitharan had walked down the pitch to celebrate his partner Sangakkara's century, while the ball was being returned to the wicketkeeper, and he was dismissed.
"We were happy to take that decision," he said.
ENGLAND CRITICISED FROM ALL SIDES
Former New Zealand wicketkeeper and Ian Smith, who is calling the series for Sky Sports, was quoted in The Times comparing Collingwood's decision to proceed with the appeal to Greg Chappell's instruction to brother Trevor to bowl underarm in Melbourne in 1981.
"I have not seen such a reaction from a New Zealand side since then," Smith said.
During his commentary of the match, Smith said: "If there has been good feeling between these two sides, it's gone. It's gone in that moment. And unfortunately, Paul Collingwood has to live with it. And that is a horrible thing when you've been such a fighting cricketer, a really good cricketer for his country. He'll have to live with that for a long time."
The Times cricket correspondent Richard Hobson wrote: "England lost the match, but, more important, a good deal of self-respect in that moment. ... Imagine, though, if England had won. It is difficult to imagine how Collingwood could have apologised with a straight face; difficult, too, to envisage how the New Zealanders might have felt able to accept it. When Graeme Swann’s errant throw missed the stumps and evaded four England fielders, the cricketing gods rendered a judgment of their own."
Former England captain Nasser Hussain told Sky Sports UK that Collingwood was right to have apologised to the New Zealand side.
"I think afterwards Collingwood was spot on. We have all done things in the heat of the moment that we have regretted," Hussain said.
"You are brought up throughout your career to win. You have the spirit of the game, but the other side is that Collingwood is the England captain and his job is to make sure that England win.
"In his mind he is battling with the two, in that moment where it was decision time, phone a friend or whatever, Collingwood went for the wrong option."
Hussain also called for more power to be handed to the umpires in judging whether an event breaches the spirit of the game.
"Take today's situation. Mark Benson, instead of asking Collingwood if the appeal stands, just says to him 'Look we have had a look at this upstairs; it has just been a genuine collision we are going to call a dead ball and get on with the game.'
"Take the heat out of the situation. The umpires have a bit more time and are a bit more relaxed, so give them the responsibility of using a bit of common sense."
TOP ORDER STRUGGLES
Richardson said the Black Caps were still showing top order problems, although he said Jacob Oram made a big difference being back in the team.
"New Zealand did well restricting England to what was probably a below par total on that surface.
"They bowled pretty well and at the end of the day they got across the line."
"Collingwood as a cricketer is hard and abrasive. He plays hard but then so does the New Zealand side."
Richardson said New Zealand was ranked third in the world when it came to one day cricket.
"There should be plenty of feeling in the last game, and so there should be as it's a nation versus nation."
"It should be a good match."
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
the murali incident is completly different to this. are you telling me that murali in all his years of playing cricket didnt know the ball is still live until it touches the keepers hands. he has played the game long enough to know the rules and also i might point out that brendon had his back to him so thought he was taking another run, this incident happend in front of everyone and bell didnt need to throw the ball with 2 players lying on the ground.why is it all on collingwood why not put some blame on to the 2 players that were involved in the runout.
I don't agree with Hussain, that Umpires be given more power. Part of the beauty of the game of cricket, is that opposition captains can overrule an umpire's decision, and send a "walking" player back onto the field. In no other sport that I can think of does this happen, and cricket should embrace their uniqueness in this respect.
GD Elliott run out (Sidebottom/Bell/Pietersen/Collingwood) 24
Muzz - how on earth did we cheat in the second game? Did we do a rain dance or something? Yeah, it was idiotic not to have completed the game but to say we cheated is complete cr*p. (Ah, bloody Poms, eh? Arrogant scum of the earth, eh?).
And to think I (amongst others) was pleased that New Zealand won yesterday after the run-out fiasco.
Ask Smithy and the NZ team if they recall how Grant Flower was dismissed in a one dayer in Harare whilst batting with brother Andy . He was run out at the bowlers end whilst backing up ( I think Martin Crowe was the captain and Patel the bowler )
What goes around comes around .
NZ should not throw stones .
To be fair it is very easy to apologise after you lost... would Collinwood be saying the same if won??
Collingwood was very very wrong and had the good sense to admit it and apologise. Shame Vettori didn't show the same sportsmanship after the Sri Lankan match, or even after yesterday's match when he wouldn't shake hands. What a bunch of spoilt brats. No wonder they struggle to be respected. Both sides should be ashamed
In my country, if such a thing had happened effigies would have been burnt,mock cremations would have been performed and the media would have been only to willing add fuel to the fire.The only sad part in all this is the gentlemen's game is officially now a rogues game.Every country has its share of cheats who get away with words such as "its not tiddlywinks" or "heat of the moment".Rubbish.
Mark Richardson is a miserable member of the human race, he only gets involved when there is something nasty to say. I am a kiwi living in England at the moment and I was bouncing off the walls watching the game yesterday, fantastic game! Talked to a couple of poms over here since then and all they can say is they think it was out of order for Vettori not to shake Collingwood's hand at the end of the game. Ridiculous!
Dad leaves stories to be remembered by
Emily Longley 'stood no chance' - prosecutor
Police uncover alleged date-rape drug lab
Health boss photographed drinking from beer bong
New Google search keeps users on page
Family of 13 face threat of homelessness
Mladic taunts survivors as genocide trial begins
Personal details in IRD papers
Bad report card for bigger classes
Fake pilot footage to be destroyed
Court told of gambling chips mystery
Banks admits receiving gift from Kim Dotcom
Family of 13 face threat of homelessness
Dad leaves stories to be remembered by
Police uncover alleged date-rape drug lab
Airport to remove homes in noise zone
Emily Longley 'stood no chance' - prosecutor
Down syndrome protest at workshop
Councillors must do more to stop demolition
Cyclists run foul of city's walkers
Officer quits after theft investigation
Editorial: The beer facts about that photograph
Auckland news, sport, entertainment and more
All you need to know about what's happening in Auckland now
Newest First
Oldest First









The NZers, followed rapidly by the press, pour scorn, derision and disgust on Collingwood following a run out after a batsman ran into Sidebottom. I chose the words carefully because the rules of cricket are, I think, pretty specific on this.
It is the batsman's responsibility to avoid fielders when running. Fielders do not have to get out of the way, but they must not deliberately obstruct the batsman in his running. Sidebottom very clearly did not do that. Sidebottom was facing the other way and the batsman, in avoiding his mate, ran smack into Sidebottom. I am sorry for him because it was an accident and he hurt himself, but there was no "unfair play", the guy is out and it was his own fault. There wasn't a run there anyway. The behaviour of the NZers, like that of Inzamam a couple of years ago, was simply childish, but again, the press have a big story and the guy that knows and sticks to the rules is made to look like a cheat.