New rules slant tipped to favour S14 big boys
BY DUNCAN JOHNSTONE
Relevant offers
South African rugby superbrain Heyneke Meyer believes the new breakdown rule interpretations will favour Super 14 powerhouses the Crusaders and Brumbies.
Meyer, who guided the Bulls to South Africa's first title in 2007 and is now back as their director of rugby, is a fan of the new slant on the rules that looks set to energise the game.
Continuity of phases is the aim of the latest interpretations to be introduced this season and that style of play has formed the basis of the Crusaders' seven titles and the Brumbies collecting two cups and appearing in three other finals.
"Teams will definitely get more quick ball, and I see teams like the Brumbies and Crusaders, who are skilled at playing through the phases, thriving under the new law interpretations,'' Meyer told South African website keo.co.za.
"The higher the speed of the recycle the more opportunities you have at finding space in the defensive line and therefore the more chances you have of scoring tries, which is what teams and the public want.''
An IRB research committee investigating last year's Super 14 and Tri-Nations competitions found almost 50% of penalties awarded for ruck infringements went to the defending team. That helped promote the kick and chase game as team's were desperate to operate in the opposition half, away from their own goalposts where they feared conceding three points.
Meyer believes openside flankers like Richie McCaw, Schalk Burger and Heinrich Brussow loom as key figures who will enjoy the ability to expand their attacking skills at the breakdown.
"Previously openside flankers were used largely in a defensive capacity – to slow ball or steal it – with particular emphasis on the latter given how difficult it has become to score from structured play.
"Now, because the law virtually eliminates the possibility of the tackler contesting the ball, I predict the openside flank will be used almost exclusively at third and fourth rucks and out wide, when there is more of an opportunity to contest the ball. The best and most intelligent opensiders will pick their rucks, and they'll still have a significant influence on matches.
"But their role will have to change from a primarily defensive one to a more balanced one, with ball carrying and ruck cleaning becoming part of their job description. Players like Richie McCaw and Schalk Burger are ideal in this regard because they tick all the boxes.''
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
To Me #15
Sounds as if you have issues? Perhaps you need to get something off your chest and put it back into the closet?
To FC Shaza #2 Get a life and stop devoting all your time posting comments on rugby, and not critizing football. The rest of nz is not interested. Do us all a favour and please return to the closet you crawled out of.
At ewoks
Get a life and stop devoting all your time posting comments on rugby, and critizing football. The rest of nz is not interested. Do us all a favour and please return to the cave you crawled out of.
rugby is gay
Matt
By your logic we should actually increase penalties to more than a try in order to stop teams giving penalties away instead of tries
Bring back rucking and problem solved!!! Duh!
Great decision but I fear that the negative forces will find a way to corn the rules. Haven't we heard how the great the ELV is until teams learned how to cheat around it? To me, bringing back the racking is what will fix the problem that was created by banning the racking at the first place.. I once got cleaned my back with prigs and never ever have I been on the "wrong side" after that.
Until drop goals are reduced to 1 point and penalties to two, it will always have a guise around forcing the opposition into making a penalty and still a reduced emphasis on try scoring.
Hi FC_Shaza #2,
Football last changed its rules when it disallowed goal keepers handling the ball when passed back by a team mate.
Their reason? To improve the spectacle. Sounds like your a real student of the game.
FC_Shaza #2: Think there's enough Hollywood antics on the football field to make Tom Cruise wanna jump on his couch.
Find these constant law changes tiresome, Southern Hemisphere has one set and the Northern Hemisphere doesn't want to play along. Spent most of my youth with one set and thoroughly enjoyed playing and watching. Now, well I just get confused with what is and isn't allowed.
Parents don't want son's killer in town
Bid to scrap race relations office
Drysdale reclaims national title at Karapiro
Flags and hope on Libya's uneasy anniversary
Teen's death prompts bail law campaign
FBI foil suicide attack on US Capitol
North Korean heir kicked out of casino
Auckland mops up after flash floods
Murdoch fights back with "Sun on Sunday"
Hotchin's Waiheke property for sale
German president Christian Wulff resigns
Prisoner spent nine months planning breakout
'Naughty' toilet traps terrified toddler
Million-dollar view, shame about the house
Trap for burglars catches policeman
Parents don't want son's killer in town
Brothel scares and stresses neighbourhood
Guptill blasts Black Caps to victory in first T20
Degrassi star died five years ago
Banking on return of blue magic
'Naughty' toilet traps terrified toddler
Bid to scrap race relations office
High cost of living mars return to NZ
Cathedral repair bill intimidating
Fear of dangerous rift from wealth gap
Hurricanes steal Sonny Bill's thunder
How prepared is Wellington for a major quake?
Related story: Wellington earthquake fear: No way in or out
Auckland news, sport, entertainment and more
All you need to know about what's happening in Auckland now
Newest First
Oldest First








I'm with Matt #11. The less importance you give to these forms of scoring, the less teams will attempt to score from them. Who wants to see a scoreboard dominated by penalty goals? Contrary to popular belief that this will increase the number of penalties given away i.e. "we may as well give away 2 points for a penalty rather than concede a try", I think the opposite will occur. Offending teams will quickly work out that the opposition won't kick for goal but kick for touch instead, putting more pressure on the defending team. Result? More tries and less penalties kicked. And of course the ref will always be there to deal with the cynical offending.
And I'm also in favour of having a time limit of halfbacks clearing the ball while it's sitting at the back of a ruck. Clear the damn thing! Give it 5 seconds or lose it.