'Nightmare' woman faces deportation

AMY MAAS
Last updated 11:29 02/02/2013

Relevant offers

National News

Dildo thrower says sex toy was just a squeaky toy Mitchell Pearce Roosters teammates cleared by NRL integrity unit after boozy night out After a decade, A$200,000 and three countries, we have a baby Boy dies after jumping from Raglan bridge Wellington man's Kentucky Fried wedding Mostly warm, dry but chance of showers, possibly thunder Islamic State forced to cut fighters' pay by up to half, thanks to air strikes Disgraced football bosses Sepp Blatter, Michel Platini invited to 2018 World Cup

A New Zealand woman described as a “pharmacological nightmare” will be deported from Australia after running over and killing two young boys while high on prescription medication.

Tania Clark, 41, who has a string of criminal convictions in Australia, has been serving a 10-year prison sentence at the Brisbane Women's Correctional Centre after the February 7, 2008 manslaughter.

On that day, Clark had consumed two cans of bourbon and coke and the prescription drugs valium, oxazapan, temazepan, codeine and doxylimen were found in her system. She had also consumed cannabis.

She was in the third week of an 18-month probation period after stealing 425 temazepan tablets from a pharmacy.

Trying to beat traffic to her probation meeting, Clark mounted a curb and drove along the footpath where she fatally struck the two children.

An Immigration Australia decision released last week said Clark was a “pharmacological nightmare” who was “extraordinarily reckless”. The 22-year resident of Australia will have her visa cancelled and she will be deported to New Zealand when she is released from prison.

In arguing the decision to cancel her visa, Clark described herself as a “different person” after undergoing a range of rehabilitation programs in prison “giving her insight into her previous behaviour”.

However, Australian immigration authorities found that Clark did not “satisfy the character test” in the Immigration Act because of her criminal history.

“I am satisfied that the protection of the Australian community is more significant in Mrs Clark's case,” the decision read.

“The nature and frequency of Mrs Clark's criminal conduct, and the likelihood of her re-offending is in conflict with an objective of the Act; that is, to protect the Australian community from unacceptable risks of harm as a result of criminal activity or other serious conduct by a non-citizen.”

Clark, who is married to an Australian citizen, has lived in the country since 1991.

Ad Feedback

- Sunday Star Times

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content