Police may challenge drink-drive decision

Last updated 11:26 04/02/2013

Relevant offers

National News

Liam Napier: Kiwi derbies may take their toll but fans love them Man charged with murder after 30 year old found dead Waratahs thrash Sunwolves in Tokyo Paul Simon thinking about retiring Delays after serious crash on Strate Highway 1 south of Taupo Unpleasant welcome awaits some Cloverlea residents following manhunt Australian Matthew Dellavedova cashes in on NBA title with big Bucks deal 64 to 116 civilians killed in drone strikes since 2009

Police are taking legal advice to see whether it's worth appealing a judge's decision to discharge a sportswoman on drink-driving charges.

Gisborne District Court judge Graham Hubble last week discharged the woman without conviction and granted her permanent name suppression after she appeared on a charge of driving with almost twice the legal alcohol limit.

Police said today they were seeking advice from the Crown Law Office on whether an appeal would be lodged.

They said the woman was not well known nationally and did not play a mainstream sport.

Her lawyer Marcia Insley had argued that her client had reached an "exceptional level" in sport, and a conviction would affect her ability to compete overseas, reports of the court appearance said.

While Hubble said that was a persuasive argument, his decision has been widely criticised by Nigel Hampton QC, Students Against Drink Driving, and the Sensible Sentencing Trust.

The woman was caught driving with a breath-alcohol level of 801 micrograms per litre of breath - double the legal limit of 400mcg.

Hampton said high-profile individuals such as actor Robyn Malcolm and QC Colin Carruthers had been named after drink-driving offences, and he could not understand the discharge or name suppression.

He said it sent a poor message to those who held sports people in high regard. 

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content