Gender still a barrier for jobseekers

Last updated 05:00 18/02/2013

Relevant offers

National News

Large high covers country but severe thunderstorms possible in central North Island after lunch Person killed in workplace accident in Christchurch James McManus to accuse Knights of care breaches Alleged ponzi fraudster's beauty business seeks buyer Pedestrian hit by car in the Bay of Plenty Oscars 2017: Organisers forgot Alexis Arquette and Garry Shandling Anti-lock braking on motorbikes could save 20 lives a year Tara Brown's mum says she'll never read note from killer Lionel Patea From a council house to historical wonderland Movie Review: Logan - Wolverine's final outing has the right X-Factor

Women are still being discriminated against by employers despite comprehensive human rights legislation, a researcher says.

Research by University of Canterbury associate professor Annick Masselot questioned legal experts in the field of gender inequality and discrimination.

She found pregnant women, those with young children or of child-bearing age in "danger of becoming pregnant" were less likely to be considered for a job.

Masselot said this was largely because of "cultural stereotypes" where women were perceived as the main carers.

"Women are not merely discriminated against because they are pregnant and are about to take a period of parental leave; they are discriminated on the basis of the next 15 years of school holidays," she said.

She said discrimination appeared to be less common in large enterprises and the public sector compared with small businesses and the private sector.

"It has been suggested that the extent of pregnancy and maternity rights is directly linked to lower employment rates among women," she said.

"However, there is no clear evidence to suggest that discrimination against women is triggered by the existence of rights or that women are discriminated against because rights are too burdensome for employers."

Advanced Personnel Services national operations manager Ryan Densem said the firm did not discriminate on what candidates were put forward to a client for a job.

However, he was aware pregnancy was a "big factor" that his clients took into consideration when hiring, but they would never admit it. "They'd never say, ‘Sorry, we won't hire you because you're pregnant'. They'd say, ‘Sorry, your background and experience isn't exactly what we're looking for'."

Densem said he had dealt with employers left "frustrated" from employing a pregnant women after investing time and money into the hiring process and training, only to have to go through the same process a few months later to cover their maternity leave.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content