Critics are 'wussies and pussies'

CHRIS FRANCESCANI
Last updated 16:31 13/09/2012
Bob Dylan
REUTERS
WUSSIES AND PUSSIES: Bob Dylan hits back at critics.

Relevant offers

Entertainment

Top 10 celebrity moments of the year Celebrity photos from the past Sony hack: North Korea fears over Team America as The Interview scene leaks How Noel Gallagher embarrasses his daughter Prince Harry shows skills as budding photographer Katy Perry show hits Auckland Katy Perry says bye to Queenstown Sir Richard Taylor: For the love of Wellington Stuff's top videos of 2014 Disney unleashes fat superhero

Bob Dylan has angrily responded to charges he plagiarised some of his lyrics, calling critics "wussies and pussies" and saying musical appropriation is "part of the folk tradition."

In an interview with Rolling Stone magazine for its Friday edition, the influential singer-songwriter made his first public comments on the accusations, saying that in folk and jazz music "quotation is a rich and enriching tradition."

"Everyone else can do it but not me," he complained. "There are different rules for me."

Rolling Stone released excerpts of the interview on Wednesday and Reuters obtained a complete transcript.

In 2003, the Wall Street Journal reported that lyrics from Dylan's 2001 record Love and Theft were remarkably similar to phrases in an obscure 1995 biography of a Japanese mobster.

A line from the biography, "I'm not as cool or forgiving as I might have sounded" was compared to Dylan's "I'm not quite as cool or forgiving as I sound." Twelve such similar phrasings have been identified.

In 2006, the New York Times made similar claims about a Civil War era poet's phrasings and Dylan's 2006 record Modern Times.

"I'm working within my art form," the 71 year-old singer told Rolling Stone. "It's that simple. ... It's called songwriting. It has to do with melody and rhythm, and then after that, anything goes. You make everything yours. We all do it."

"These are the same people that tried to pin the name Judas on me," Dylan added, referring to bitter 1960s folk fans who decried his move into electric guitar blues and famously compared the singer to the Biblical apostle who betrayed Jesus.

"Judas - the most hated name in human history!" he exclaimed. "If you think you've been called a bad name, try to work your way out from under that. Yeah, and for what? For playing an electric guitar? As if that is in some kind of way equitable to betraying our Lord and delivering him up to be crucified. All those evil ... can rot in hell," he said.

ART DIFFERENT FROM WRITING

Musical appropriation - using familiar cultural references or language in a new context - is different from non-fiction writing or journalism, said Sean Wilentz, a Princeton University professor of American history who has written extensively about Dylan.

"Of course it's legitimate," Wilentz told Reuters of Dylan's use of others' material. "Dylan's frame of reference is so much larger than most songwriters' - more literary, historical and philosophical."

Ad Feedback

Wilentz said crediting bits and pieces of another's work is scholarly tradition, not an artistic tradition.

"Creating art is different, and always has been, especially the kind Dylan creates," he said.

Dylan, who released Tempest, his 35th studio album last week, has been scrutinised throughout his 50-year career, at least in part because he has proven so unpredictable and defied convention at virtually every turn.

In 2006, he stunned fans when he appeared in a sensuous Victoria's Secret commercial. In 1990, he released an album made up largely of children's nursery rhymes. In the late 1970s, the Jewish-raised Dylan embraced Christianity and sang only religious-themed music for several years.

In a 50-year career, he has won 11 Grammys, an Academy Award, a Pulitzer Prize, the US Presidential Medal of Freedom and numerous other awards.

"I'm not like you," he told the Rolling Stone interviewer at one point.

- Reuters

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content