Hitchcock history gets revised

Last updated 05:00 09/02/2013

UTTERLY SHALLOW: Helen Mirren and Anthony Hopkins in Hitchcock. Best stick to Hitchcock’s own movies.

Relevant offers


Six Kiwi celebrity Halloween costume ideas Did Mariah Carey 'walk out' on billionaire boyfriend James Packer? Hilary Barry's Breakfast - one month on Kristen Stewart and St Vincent go public with romance Sharyn Casey: why I love Jay Jay Harvey Watch: Taika's Thor farewell clip Megan Fox shares first baby photo two months after giving birth Album Review: Lady Gaga's Joanne Dreamworld accident: Aussie radio host Anna Dare suspended over 'joke' Is this the scariest triple feature ever screened?

HITCHCOCK (M) (98 min) 

Directed by Sacha Gervasi. Starring Helen Mirren, Anthony Hopkins, Scarlett Johansson.

If you like your history neatly packaged, re-written for narrative convenience, and bearing only the faintest relation to reality, then you probably liked A Beautiful Mind a great deal more than I did. You'll also probably like Hitchcock.

Hitchcock purports to tell the story of how Psycho came to be made. North by Northwest was a hit, but Alfred Hitchcock was feeling his age. Overweight, over drinking, and completely over himself, he turned to the most shocking and controversial book in the shops, and set about making a film full of violence, incest, dismemberment, and misogyny. 

We know that he succeeded, but Hitchcock the film determinedly dumbs down the story, and buffoon-ises its central character to an insulting degree. 

Anthony Hopkins does everything he can with the writing. But Hitchcock the man was an immensely complex and tormented individual. Hitchcock the film settles for somewhere between lecherous and avuncular, and plays everything else for laughs. 

It's a competent film, full of craft and professionalism, but I found it irritating and utterly shallow. Feel free to disagree.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post


Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content