Why achieving economic growth matters

BY BILL ENGLISH
Last updated 08:15 07/01/2010

Relevant offers

OPINION: New Zealand is on the road to recovery. Heading into 2010, economic growth is stronger than expected and unemployment lower, thanks to a more stable global economy and the Government's success in managing New Zealand through the recession.

As we emerge from the downturn, our focus has firmly shifted toward putting in place policies that permanently raise our economic performance.

Economic growth matters because it creates jobs, increases incomes and improves the living standards of New Zealand families. Only through increasing our economic growth can we close the gap with our trading partners.

Significantly improving our economic performance will be the overriding focus of the Budget for 2010.

However, before we look forward, it is important to reflect on the past year.

A year ago global markets were in freefall and many businesses were fighting to keep their doors open as banks stopped lending. The Treasury forecast that unemployment would hit 8 per cent.

Our immediate concern was to ensure that as many New Zealanders as possible retained their jobs. We struck a balance between maintaining spending and controlling debt and we put in place a rolling maul of initiatives to support families and jobs.

This approach has worked. Revised forecasts suggest unemployment will now peak at about 7 per cent - 17,000 lower than Budget projections - and far lower than the devastating scale witnessed in the United States and Europe.

Protecting New Zealanders from the sharp edges of the recession was an urgent focus for us in 2009. However, while we were fighting the recession, we were also busy preparing the economy for recovery.

We have identified six key areas as potential drivers of growth. These are:

* Investment in productive infrastructure.

* Removing red tape and improving regulation.

* Supporting business innovation and trade.

* Improving education and lifting skills.

* Lifting productivity and improving services in the public sector.

* Strengthening the tax system.

* We have done a lot in these areas already.

Over the next five years we will spend an unprecedented $7.5 billion upgrading the country's economic arteries, including our main roading, electricity and broadband networks.

We have completed the first stage of Resource Management Act reforms, we have taken decisive action to sort out the electricity sector and we have put red tape under the microscope, undertaking reviews of 14 major pieces of legislation.

We have moved to get better value out of Government spending - capping the number of bureaucrats, shifting $2b of low priority spending into frontline services and ensuring the Crown's $100b of assets are better managed.

Ad Feedback

We have also strengthened New Zealand's trade networks - completing or signing trade deals with Malaysia, Hong Kong and the Gulf Co-operation Council in the Middle East. In addition, we have taken the first steps toward entering free-trade negotiations with the United States.

These moves have helped us weather the recession better than expected.

The crisis of the past year has hit most countries worse than New Zealand. Many will be saddled with permanently higher debt and will be forced to raise taxes.

New Zealand has a unique opportunity to emerge from the recession in a stronger position than these countries. Sound finances and low taxes could be a key point of difference in attracting business investment and skilled people to New Zealand.

* * *

However, we still face risks. Global growth may weaken again and there are multiple challenges in our own economy.

Since 2000, the economy has performed below its potential. This reflects growing roadblocks to enterprise and investment within the economy.

Growth has been low and unbalanced in recent years, at a time of very large increases in Government expenditure.

The tradeable side of the economy - exports and those industries that face international competition - has been in recession for five years, with output now about 10 per cent below 2005 levels.

By contrast, the public sector has grown rapidly, but with poor productivity. That has lowered the overall productivity of our economy.

Unless we can turn this around and create the right environment for New Zealand businesses to compete on the world stage, we will not achieve the sustained increase in incomes this Government aspires to.

That is why we are continuing work on each of the six drivers I outlined earlier. You will see initiatives in each of those areas in this year's Budget.

However, as a Government we don't have a monopoly on bright ideas. That's why we have set some of the best minds in the country the task of coming up with ways to increase growth.

Some of these groups have already reported back, such as the Capital Market Development Taskforce and the 2025 Taskforce. Others, such as the National Infrastructure Plan and the report of the Victoria University-led Tax Working Group will be presented to the Government and issued in coming weeks.

These reports will canvass a range of ideas and options. As a Government we will look through them and pick out the best and most practical ideas. They will form part of Budget 2010.

As finance minister, I'm pleased New Zealand has come through a once-in-a- generation world crisis in better shape than most of the countries we compete against.

However, the crisis has left a hole in the Government's books that will take several years to rectify. In addition, it has left many New Zealanders out of work, which has a profound impact on them and their families.

The challenge now is to get the economy growing again at a stronger rate that meets our jobs and income aspirations.

Budget 2009 got us on the road to recovery. Budget 2010 will build on that to ensure we significantly lift our economic performance.

Bill English is the Minister of Finance.

12 comments
Post a comment
VfM   #12   01:29 pm Jan 18 2010

I'm disappointed that this article fails to articulate preciesly why Mr English believes that 'economic growth' matters.

Wallis (2009, NZTA RR#350) found that actions that raise GDP can actually reduce social wellbeing as appraised using formal cost-benefit analysis. So a deeper understanding of what's required is needed; perhaps it is an increased taxation base to repay debt and cover future superannuation payments?

There is huge uncertainty across the govt sector about what it is that Mr English actually wants and how to achieve it.

Unfortunately, the type of thinking required to nail this has been deemed 'beaurocratic time wasting', and so isn't being done. Sadly I fear the claimed value for money being achieved is just coming about via politicisation of the public sector, as evidenced by the decision to invest $1b in Transmission Gully, a project that destroys 60 cents for every $1 put into it. So much for having a competent and politically independent public sector.

Peter T   #11   10:14 am Jan 18 2010

"Economic growth matters because it creates jobs, increases incomes and improves the living standards of New Zealand families. Only through increasing our economic growth can we close the gap with our trading partners."

All the economic growth since the 1980s has seen the gaps between NZ and Australia as well as between rich and poor within NZ widen. This notion that economic growth (typically measured as an aggregate of all economic transactions within the economy) is a reliable measure of anybody's real economic wellbeing is simply nonsense. For example, economic growth can occur at the same time as consumers are getting more and more entrenched in debt- which in real terms means ordinary folk are getting poorer. Likewise, GDP tells you the volume of economic activity over a given period but it doesn't tell you how much of the profits of, say, ANZ or Telecom get expatriated to foreign shareholders. So it's not going to tell you much about closing the gap with Australia, because economic growth in the NZ economy may disguise the fact that some of that wealth is being siphoned out to our economic rivals. Consequently, this government's obsession about closing the gap with Australia is no more than a Quixotean tilt at an economic windmill. It is superficial economic rhetoric which at is, at best, political PR- But at worst, it suggests Bill English cannot distinguish between artificial economic models and real life. Time to get some real economists in the Treasury.

Questioning   #10   01:20 pm Jan 11 2010

Not amazingly good newspaper editing, putting a blatant political advertisement under "Columnists" surely? Don't get me wrong, I'm a National voter, but it's out of order whoever's doing it...

Jim   #9   04:39 pm Jan 07 2010

It's always enlightening to see just how stupid a Government percieves its citizens to be.

Edward   #8   01:14 pm Jan 07 2010

At last - economically literate management for NZ!!

burt   #7   01:08 pm Jan 07 2010

Agree entirely with Justice. LAQC's were never meant to be vehicles for scoring tax breaks from speculative property purchases but more a recognition that start up businesses generally run at a loss for a few years and would benefit from a helping hand in the form of tax breaks until they can turn a dollar. Anyone who thinks we have turned the corner has their head in the sand. The latest "rebound" is merely another credit bubble which will no doubt fuel the syphoning of yet more cash into non productive assets. Ah well, all those harvesting tax losses can probably look forward to more as rampant inflation fuels higher interest rates, those that can handle the jandal that is!

bruce   #6   12:39 pm Jan 07 2010

Bill, if you want economic growth, improved productivity, better value added outcomes you're going to have to change things.

I note you use the term strenghening the tax system. That worries me. What you ought to be doing, and as everyone is recommending you do, is reform the tax system so it is fair. There is no way in hell that having just 3% of the population funding 26% of your tax revenue is sustainable.

The Australian's have said just this week that they are opening the door for our doctors to find work over there. You offer nothing to keep people here. You've vetoed all the good ideas offered before the ink dried.

I think 2010 is shaping up as another 2009. I've seen no indication from National thus far that that have something to fuel economic growth; attract people to NZ or lift our incomes and/or the countries prospects.

If we had a change of government, then I missed it.

From the Sidelines   #5   10:55 am Jan 07 2010

Good to see that the much needed rebalancing and strengthening the economy is still high on the Govt agenda. However, the proof will be in the actions, not just the political spin. How the Govt addresses the recommendations in the Capital Markets Report and the Tax Report will be key. They must act on these in 2010 if they are to maintain their credibility of ecomonic reform.

Justice   #4   10:51 am Jan 07 2010

Dress up the political 'faecal matter' all you like. NZ will fail IF the US and others do not get their banking and finance system sorted and their National Debt down. Perpetual Growth is unrealistic. Capital Gains Tax please and get rid of LAQC's relating to property investing! My shares and bank account get taxed regardless so why not rental properties? In NZ it will work. Not interested in other countries examples as their tax and investment systems are entirely different. We ALL know most MP's have property portfolios including yourself and you are just trying your best to avoid your civic duty of paying taxes. Either we all pay tax or none of us do relative to our incomes. What you invest in should not make any difference NOR be an advantage over other investments where tax is required.

Anne   #3   10:50 am Jan 07 2010

New Zealand was in a strong position which is why we weren't so affected by the recession. When will National listen - the majority of New Zealander's like our way of life - we want our unspoiled (and unmined) National parks and unhurried pace of life.


Show 1-2 of 12 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content