Cricket's splat factor calls for creative thinking
BY JOE BENNETT
Relevant offers
OPINION: Sometimes I chew over a subject for ages before writing about it. One such subject has been the danger of flying cricket balls. For with the advent of Twenty20, the cricketing equivalent of two-minute noodles, the ball flies into the crowd with the regularity of shells into World War I trenches, and it is only a matter of time before a spectator finds one with his name on it. Throughout the summer months my giant throbbing brain has chewed on this horrific possibility, as a cow chews on the cud.
This week I felt ready to address the subject in print. Then I opened the Sunday paper and found that Richard Boock had beaten me to it. He'd pulled the cud out from under my feet.
My first reaction was to feel I'd been gazumped. But then I realised that Mr Boock and I were actually sharing the chewing duties. He had raised awareness of a danger. Now I would step in and provide the solution. Together we'd save cricket lovers from what is known to baseball crowds as the splat.
My first thought was an air raid siren. A well-struck six spends several seconds in the air, giving time for a siren to sound. But having warned people of danger you have to offer them refuge, and the cost of building multiple air raid shelters might prove prohibitive.
Hi-tech seats were the next idea to emerge from this throbbing cerebellum. Again the outlay would be considerable, but the seats would pay for themselves in the long run by appealing to the more timorous demographic. Spectators would be strapped into these seats for the duration of the game like astronauts at takeoff. When the siren sounded, a Kevlar head guard, like one of those hair-driers under which women read magazines, would slide over the patron's skull.
Nevertheless, there would remain the risk of a blow to torso, limb or genitals with potentially debilitating consequences. So I hired a military hardware company to investigate the possibility of installing a detonator inside the ball and generating an electro-magnetic force field from the boundary rope.
As the ball passed through the force field the detonator would be activated, the ball would disintegrate and, instead of being brained, the crowd would be showered with harmless confetti, and perhaps chocolates. But the prototypes proved unreliable. Many balls exploded at unscheduled moments during play, causing significant alarm to players.
A techie friend suggested placing spectators in one stadium while the game was played in another. The action would be relayed to the spectators in real time via giant 3D screens. It's a neat solution but the technology to achieve a satisfactory spectator experience is not here yet. In the meantime something has to be done to cover the legal liabilities.
* * *
In this enlightened era we simply cannot make the neolithic assumption that people who go to watch a game of cricket understand that it may involve a cricket ball and that, if they don't fancy the risk of being hit, they should stay away.
Personal responsibility is yesterday's thinking. So in the best modern style we're going to have to have signage, and lots of it. Patrons must be given the information they need to make an informed choice.
Every cricket ground will have to install an electronic board that announces the statistical likelihood of a spectator being: a. killed; b. paralysed; c. maimed; or d. merely admitted to hospital. (Figures will be based on stats gathered from around the globe and constantly updated from a central database hosted by the International Cricket Council.)
To allow cricket lovers to make an even more informed decision the board will also present the comparable risk of being: a. struck by lightning; b. blown up by terrorists; c. bitten by katipo spiders (which just love to nest in old stadium seating); or d. involved in a car crash on the way to a game.
And as a final thought, the ICC should run a tote on splats. Huge prizes will go to the punter who correctly guesses the date and location of a splat along with the precise degree of incapacity generated, thus enhancing cricket's appeal for the gambler. And some of the profits will go to rehabilitating the victim. In other words, everyone's a winner.
There, that's what happens when two giant throbbing brains apply themselves constructively to an urgent safety concern.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Hockey pucks do pretty much the same thing (re: ice hockey games) where the crowd is, erm, somewhat protected by that plexiglass surrounding the rink of combat. I've seen a couple of games on the telly where the unwitting spectator 40 rows back has unfortunately received a broken nose from a spectacular ricochet. Not that they mind. They're hockey fans.
I love the forcefield idea. Particulary the bit about chocolates. I think you would expand into the US and European market as they adapt this to fit ice rinks.
Bain defence still less than convincing
Cases made it a week for the ferals
Opinion: Time for Australia to claim NZ
National wakes from RWC slumber
Downgrades hit National where it hurts
Brash may have sounded death knell
Nats in hot seat over party central
No rankling expected over new list
Voters pick up the dog tucker signals
Brothel scares and stresses neighbourhood
Guptill blasts Black Caps to victory in first T20
Quake felt across lower North Island
'Naughty' toilet traps terrified toddler
Million-dollar view, shame about the house
Hurricanes weather elements to beat Chiefs
Trap for burglars catches policeman
Bain defence still less than convincing
Councillors back Marryatt's golf leave
Protest rally to seek council elections
O'Connor attacks Smith's stance
Suburban rebuild plans delayed
Five Riccarton businesses closed
4.1 quake forces Jellie Park closures
City councillor in starring role
Newest First
Oldest First
Alternatively, the spectators could simply watch the ball and either avoid it or catch it themselves.