A racket worse than toddlers squawking

BY JANE CLIFTON
Last updated 05:00 19/03/2010

Relevant offers

OPINION: As soon as Labour's Charles Chauvel got to his feet in Parliament to ask a question, a frisson ran through National's ministers. Who was going to do it?

Maurice Williamson's face twitched with temptation, Judith Collins started stage-whispering suggestions to her colleagues; even Wayne Mapp had a mischievous air. But naturally, it was the ever-excitable Nick Smith who took the initiative.

"Why do you hate children?" he interjected on Mr Chauvel, who has unwillingly hogged the headlines over his audibly intolerant comments about some rowdy infants on a plane the other night.

Mr Chauvel's colleague Grant Robertson took offence on his behalf – although handily repeating the remark, which most MPs would not have heard. Speaker Lockwood Smith agreed it was not an acceptable comment and advised MPs to "treat the House with more respect".

ACT's Rodney Hide wasn't feeling respectful. "Answer the question!" he called to Mr Chauvel, bringing Labour's David Cunliffe to his feet to complain that Mr Hide had just flouted the Speaker's ruling by harking back to the original offence.

This was catnip to Mr Hide, who couldn't resist deriding the House for getting "all too precious" and taking the opportunity to give the offending remark its third repetition. "It can't be out of order for some member to call out, `why do you hate children?"' he said.

This baited Labour's Trevor Mallard, who weighed in saying Mr Hide had now deliberately repeated the original offensive remark, which in itself was an offence. He reminded Dr Smith that just minutes earlier, he had banned Labour's Clayton Cosgrove from the House after he sarcastically hailed "another fair and balanced ruling!" – clearly meaning the opposite. Mr Hide had just challenged the Speaker's ruling in a much more serious way, and yet had not been disciplined.

This brought Mr Mallard a warning, since he was now challenging the Speaker's ruling about challenging Speakers' rulings.

Mr Hide and Dr Smith beamed with satisfaction, while Mr Chauvel, who still had not had the opportunity to ask his question, may have reflected on what was hardest on the ears: rampaging toddlers or points-scoring colleagues.

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

13 comments
Post a comment
Gilbert   #13   12:19 pm Mar 19 2010

Why didn't Wayne Mapp get to speak and give us his erudite views on this? He is the spokesperson and authority on matters of Political Correctness.

Steve   #12   11:58 am Mar 19 2010

Most of us weren't on the plane and as such we don't know how the children were behaving or misbehaving for that matter. Kids will be kids. Parents will usually be more forgiving towards other children who are "misbehaving" as all kids have their moment.

I wonder, does Mr Chauvel have kids of his own? Have they ever misbehaved in public?

Suzi   #11   11:44 am Mar 19 2010

Mr Chauvel could have easily resolved the issue by aplogising. He chose not to and the sorry saga carries on. Honestly bad advice... I dont know how Dr Smith copes with the behaviour . he at least is trying hard to bring a semblance of balance and order to the house. This is a further example of how our representatives work hard to deal with the pressing issues facing our country ....NOT

JeffM   #10   11:31 am Mar 19 2010

Charles Chauvel doesnt hate kids, he hates their unruly behaviour. At that behaviour is because the PC brigrade, headed by that fine example of self control and self discipline, Sue Bradford, have highjacked a parent's right to exercise control over their children and discipline them when necessary. Good on you Charles!

Si   #9   11:24 am Mar 19 2010

I hate the children in our parliment

sammy   #8   11:23 am Mar 19 2010

Charles Chauvel is probably the only person to come out of this stupid saga with some measure of respect. He simply reacted like a normal human being ... in other words, like the rest of us.

Everyone else (media, politicians, bloggers) just needs to be stuck in a room with the noisy toddlers. It's obviously where they belong!

kaz   #7   11:20 am Mar 19 2010

If you ask me, I would say that it seems Parliament is full of a lot of loud, undisciplined and naughty toddlers!

The whole issue regarding Charles Chauvel commenting to his companion about the 'noisy kid on plane' is an absolute waste of time and I can't understand, for the life of me, why this is such a great debate. So what? I would've said the same thing if I had been sitting behind a noisy kid on a plane - and I'm a mother! Difference is, I wouldn't let my kids be that disruptive!

And I'm not a Labour supporter!

William   #6   11:00 am Mar 19 2010

I am not a natural Labour supporter but I agree 100% with Charles Chauvel. Badly behaved children in public places should not have to be tolerated any more than bad behaviour from adults. Parents who allow children to inflict poor manners or discipline on the general public need to take responsibilty for such behaviour and remedy it by either stopping the behaviour or removing their children to a private place. Becuse too many people do not have the bravery to express when bad behaviour is not acceptable we have witnessed a steady and continuing decline in morals, respect and behaviour in NZ over the last 20 years.

Jeremy   #5   10:49 am Mar 19 2010

What a joke - not a very funny one though, since the joke is on all of us. Firstly, let's employ a speaker who demands respect. Someone who wants to get on with the job, and won't take any bullshit. Then install 120 trapdoors, and all of this bullshit will stop.

Or maybe we just need to have "parliament service", which would bring 20 or so ordinary citizens into Parliament, similar to jury service. Maybe our elected representatives would behave themselves in front of taxpayers. Particularly if each MP had to face a vote of no confidence at the end of each month.

Paul   #4   10:17 am Mar 19 2010

there is something seriously wrong with whoever these people are that are keeping Rodney Hide in Parliament


Show 1-3 of 13 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content