It's business time for Key's new Government
POLITICAL WEEK - By TRACY WATKINS
Relevant offers
It was a top aide to Barack Obama who said recently: "Rule One. Never allow a crisis to go to waste." By that, he explained, he meant that a serious crisis provided "opportunities to do big things".
Unlike our Government, Mr Obama still hasn't got his feet under the table – but he and his people are already working on a massive recovery plan, on top of those other massive recovery plans that the United States has thrown on the fire of the worst financial crisis in 70-plus years.
The fact our Government is sworn in and officially has its feet under the table may be illusory – the pace of government formation was so fast that understaffed ministers' offices are still trying to catch their breath – but it is not altogether clear yet that any "big things", or even anything particularly new to suit the times, has yet made it on to the agenda.
The fiscal stimulus and economic recovery plan talked up by Finance Minister Bill English last week is in fact a shrunk-down version of what National initially had in mind when the scale of the disaster confronting the world was, if not in its infancy, then still unfolding. We know that because when the Treasury opened the books on a disturbingly grim set of forecasts way back in October – before things really hit the skids – Mr English and his team spent the next couple of days furiously trimming National's tax cut package and slowing the rate of infrastructure spending, the two big-ticket items in its election manifesto.
That they had cut their cloth to suit the times was how National sold the package then; it feared – probably justifiably – that the original, more ambitious, package it had in mind would be written off as reckless and even downright dangerous. It's curious, however, that the same package is now being sold as an economic blockbuster.
Since that package was announced, National has bolted on a transitional assistance package for people who lose their jobs, and supported the moves to shore up banking confidence with the banking deposit guarantee scheme.
Yet an awful lot of water seems to have surged under the bridge since; the sorts of figures being thrown at the "recovery" in the US, for instance, are eye-watering in their scale. In Britain, the same "damn the torpedoes, full steam ahead" mindset also prevails.
As Guardian writer Michael White notes, caution is the new recklessness. Which may explain the almost breezy way in which British Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling explained he was "almost certainly" going to have to follow up his $56 billion recovery package of last week with another dose in a few months. And this from a man whose latest package alone is predicted to push net public debt to a staggering 57 per cent. We're on easy street by comparison; the next set of forecasts are tipped to show debt at about 28 per cent.
The rest of the world, in other words, has decided to "go defcon" – while on our side of the globe, despite the "whatever it takes" promises from Prime Minister John Key and Mr English, there has only been cautious talk about bringing forward small infrastructure projects, and a whiff of "awaiting developments" in the air. Even the much- touted December economic stimulus package has had to borrow heavily from Labour's October 1 tax cuts, which have already been banked, to arrive at the $7 billion figure that is being tossed around as a sign of willing on the Government's part to join the "fiscal stimulation" party.
Maybe it's like the old saying about the importance of keeping your head while others around you lose theirs. There are, after all, some factors in favour of the Government's caution; who would have thought, for instance, we would be counting our blessings for suffering punishingly high interest rates all those years. We will get much more bang for the buck out of falling interest rates than other comparable Western economies.
In terms of economic stimulus, the rapidly falling interest and exchange rates alone are, literally, worth their weight in gold.
And, as Mr English points out, our politicians were, in a sense, ahead of the game, because the timing of the election campaign forced them to fire the big guns early. The risk is that the lengthy gap in between could start to look like a vacuum. And events have moved so rapidly that assumptions made on the campaign trail may have been overtaken.
But along with the opportunity to "do big things" that the Obama team talks about, comes the opportunity to fall further and harder. There is no doubt where minor Government ally ACT would see the opportunities, for instance – in ACT's case more privitisation, slashing government spending and big tax cuts.
But National's talk so far of curbing government spending has been cautious – and while it seems increasingly likely that some hard decisions will have to be made in light of the deteriorating position, it has ruled out the sort of upheaval that a harsh prescription like ACT's would incur. The other option, to throw a far bigger package at the recession than the one National entered the election campaign with, would be in line with the current international fashion – but it comes with no guarantee of success either.
With Mr Key out of the country for Apec in his first week on the job, today – when he leads his first Cabinet meeting – is the first real day of the new Government getting down to business.
Events on the international stage, including the Air New Zealand disaster, may overshadow it – and the report card for the new Government, to date, on its response to those disasters in its first week is mixed. After a slow response earlier in the week to events in India (again, we can blame the fact that ministers' offices are still only on skeleton staff) it had stepped up a gear by the end of the week in responding to the Air New Zealand disaster.
But those are matters beyond the Government's control; it is on how it responds over the next few weeks to the more pressing matters within its control that will decide whether the honeymoon is a long one or cut short prematurely.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Tracy
Dont you think its time the media had a rest from referring to ACT as a harsh, slash and cut mentality party. It might help an average story with some inuendo and scaremongering but in reality it is tiring, mainly because it isnt factual anymore.
ACT wants to "cap" government spending, not "cut" government spending, although I am sure there are many billions that could be cut and handed back to the taxpayer in the form of lower taxes.
I find it amusing that as journalists you never point out that what ACT actually want for NZ'ers is a better life than what they have now, not a worse life. Lower taxes put more money in poor peoples pockets.
I guess it will be a while before you guys catch on to ACT's policies as being "best practice for real people" and not some wayout ideaology, but then Roger Douglas was 20 years ahead of the game in 1984. Its 2008 and your lot are only now accepting that his policies were right.
Cases made it a week for the ferals
Opinion: Time for Australia to claim NZ
National wakes from RWC slumber
Downgrades hit National where it hurts
Brash may have sounded death knell
Nats in hot seat over party central
No rankling expected over new list
Voters pick up the dog tucker signals
Pop music star Whitney Houston dies
Ethnic rights advice stuns communities
Daily trivia quiz: February 12
Dotcom accused van der Kolk 'flabbergasted'
Roll on 2050 - New Zealand economy to rise
Prison officers 'turned into mules'
Pop music star Whitney Houston dies
Quake city assets set to be popular
Welly whiz-kid sees hi-tech future for education
CERA report prompts mall evacuation
Prime Minister John Key wins hearts if not minds
Newest First
Oldest First
The whole point is ..... Dr Cullen was on the right track.
In opposition National and Act showed no imagination about anything and it appears that Treasury Dept remains just as much "head in the sand".
Dr Cullen told Treasury that they were making "ideological burps", but it appears Treasury continue to use the same antacids.
Finance Minister Bill English would like there to be a gap in order that people forget what Dr Cullen was doing, and forget how National criticised it, and forget that National were stuck in the same old dogma which has just not worked.
New Zealand's is a very open economy and it is a price-taker for its more substantial exports. Tourism has been our biggest industry. The popular timeframe for the downturn was 1 - 2 years, but there was never much detail about why this was an appropriate period of time. One now reads forecasts of 4 or more years, and reads more about a changing world order. Creditor nations are looking at internal investment/consumption patterns.
Borrow and spend has been the tradition and tax cuts (until there is a deficit) funding consumerism has been the mechanism. Dr Cullen's was a lone voice. National and Act in opposition, the Treasury Dept and the media have all trotted out what was in vogue across the Western world - but it has not worked - not even for the economies which are better able to control their destiny than ourselves.
JPK says he is pragmatic and not driven by ideology. Well, what made him join the National Party?
When stood beside selective government investment spending, or appropriate subsidised private spending (home insulation, as an example), tax cuts as the core of an economic stimulus package just do not stack up. The National-led government is politically committed to what Dr Cullen considered a very poor choice. Dr Cullen was right.
The new government has to undergo its own "ideological burp" and it is not feeling very comfortable.