Nats win will see wind drop for gas plants
The Dominion Post
Relevant offers
Contact Energy could potentially build a huge $600 million new gas-fired power station in Auckland if National gets into power, while wind farms would be uneconomic, an independent energy analyst says.
National confirmed yesterday that it would ditch Labour's plan to ban new base-load gas-fired power stations for 10 years, which National said put the security of supply at risk.
Analyst Bryan Leyland said New Zealand needed more power generation as "soon as possible" after drought caused this winter's hydro power shortage.
The place to build a plant quickest was at Contact's Otahuhu site in Auckland, which already had consent for its existing power station, Mr Leyland said. It could be built within two years.
If it chose that option, Contact could buy a 400-megawatt combined cycle power station for about $600 million - much cheaper than a wind farm.
Such gas-fired stations would cost about $1500 to $2000 a kilowatt of capacity to build and run all the time, while wind power would cost $3000 or more and run less than half of the time.
Geothermal or gas-fired power stations were more economic and planned wind farms would probably be shelved as a result, Mr Leyland said.
Building a new gas-fired station at Otahuhu meant household power prices would probably stabilise instead of continuing to rise rapidly.
Some critics have suggested that Labour's planned ban on thermal power stations would result in power prices rising as much as 50 per cent, after adjusting for inflation, as more costly wind farms were built instead of gas-fired stations.
High wholesale prices this winter because of the power shortage were likely to rise about 15 per cent more next year.
Contact Energy would not comment on National's energy policy yesterday.
John Pfahlert, New Zealand Petroleum Exploration and Production Association executive officer, said the policy would guarantee an affordable and secure supply of electricity. The association also welcomed National's plan to spend $25 million over three years on seismic surveys. "It is modest and sensible."
Sponsored links
US dairy lobby attacks Fonterra 'monopoly'
$12 a week better off with tax changes
Legal hope for failed finance firm investors
I can't pay $19m in damages - Birnie
Gerry Harvey's New Zealand plan
Dalziel in 'celebrity director' broadside
Hide protests over burden on Telecom
Prostitutes and fraud but wife stands by banker
Cubicle farming still on horizon
Dozens of jobs lost with Boxing On
Firm fined over beekeeper's fatal crash
One dead after driver flees checkpoint
'Knight' owes millions, say investors
Heavy rain headed to South Island
Roads reopen after Tokoroa gas leak
Ellen presents gay teen scholarship
What next for Google in China?
Moore's Twitter suicide intervention
Spectacular farewell for plane crash victim
Anna Nicole Smith gets none of oil fortune
Lara Bingle a PR disaster for king of stunts
Dutch lash out at gay link in Srebrenica massacre
Bulls hold out to beat Hurricanes
Katherine Heigl's dress malfunction
One dead after driver flees checkpoint
'Knight' owes millions, say investors
Kiwi technophobe turns into cyberspace sensation
'Year of hell' after false rape claim
Ellen presents gay teen scholarship
Lara Bingle a PR disaster for king of stunts
This one time at straight camp…
The Government's own leaky home saga