$1 billion bonanza hope in US deal

Last updated 01:19 23/09/2008

Relevant offers

The dairy sector could be the big winner from the United States' decision to negotiate a free trade pact with New Zealand and three other countries.

US officials confirmed yesterday the US had agreed to join the P4 group of Pacific Rim countries - Singapore, New Zealand, Chile and Brunei - to negotiate a trade deal, which would add up to $1 billion a year to our economy.

Prime Minister Helen Clark said yesterday she was "blown away by the news".

The value of the final free trade agreement would be about the same as that of the bilateral pact that has eluded her government for years, partly because of foreign policy issues including New Zealand's anti-nuclear policy.

"It could be worth up to $1 billion per year for the local economy," she said.

Miss Clark expected the US deal to be worth far more than the free trade agreement signed with China in April. It would also be much easier to negotiate.

The US is New Zealand's second biggest trading partner, and accounts for 10 per cent of all our trade.

Trade Minister Phil Goff is in the United States.

He said today he expected the first round of negotiations would take place in early 2009.

The New Zealand public would have a chance to submit on the shape of the country's negotiating mandate.

"Securing an FTA negotiation with the United States, the world's largest economy, has been a key trade objective for more than a decade," Mr Goff said.

"Securing this through the P4 negotiations follows my discussions of this idea with [US Trade Representative] Susan Schwab at a trade meeting in Cairns 14 months ago. I am delighted that the US has taken up this idea.

"To have this commitment from the United States in the same year as we have also concluded FTAs with China and the ASEAN economies is a great achievement and opens up the prospect of significant and sustained benefits to New Zealand businesses and the economy in general," Mr Goff said.

He said interest in the agreement had been shown by other countries such as Peru, Vietnam and Australia.

"Eventually we hope the agreement will prove attractive to other large economies in the region such as Japan. As significant export markets for New Zealand exports, this would also bring big benefits for New Zealand," Mr Goff said.

News of the deal - which would be the biggest trade pact for New Zealand since closer economic relations with Australia in the 1980s - seeped out early.

Miss Clark said a change in the US administration in November would be unlikely to dampen enthusiasm in Washington for a deal.

Ad Feedback

National's trade spokesman Tim Groser, a former ambassador to the World Trade Organisation, shared Miss Clark's enthusiasm and predicted Australia - which has had its own free-trade deal with the US since 2005 - would also want to get involved in the deal.

He believed the dairy sector was likely to emerge as the big winner because the deal could break down strict tariff barriers for dairy products entering the US.

Federated Farmers president Don Nicolson said the US already bought more than $1.7 billion of New Zealand's meat and dairy a year, but a free trade agreement would provide a greater foothold.

With US farmers getting around $300 billion in subsidies over the past decade the agreement would "level the playing field".

"This free trade pact is great news. Since the 1980s, when we lost all of our subsidies, we've become one of the most efficient producers of meat and dairy in the world. We're very well placed to match any competition," he said.

Former prime minister and former World Trade Organisation head Mike Moore urged caution. He said it was too early to be making comparisons with New Zealand's recently signed free trade agreement with China.

"The deal has yet to be done and there is a lot of hard work ahead. But it's all good," Mr Moore said.

The P4 agreement was signed between Singapore, Chile and New Zealand in 2005 before Brunei signed up the following year.

The US decision to join the agreement will give impetus to a long-term plan within the 21-member Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) forum to forge a free trade agreement of the Asia Pacific.

Apec, comprising such nations as the United States, China, Russia, Chile, Japan, Canada, Australia and key Southeast Asian economies, accounts for nearly half of world trade.

- © Fairfax NZ News

13 comments
mdj   #13   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

The reward for agreeing to the US ??? India nuclear deal.

jonny   #12   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

about time, but at least 4 years too late. Helen could have got this done in the Bush administration first term (when he still had fast track trade agreement authority) if she hadn't been so high and might about Iraq and pissed off the White House.

Jake   #11   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

thats a stupid comment Danielle, pure stupidity, it had nothing to do with Helen, it was the USA that signed the deal, the deal was signed in 2005 by New Zealand, this isnt some great leap in diplomacy. If your not going to think before you type please refrain from typing at all, as your useless remarks just prove your ignorance, and your lack of literacy.

ALR   #10   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

$1 billion a year flows on to the entire economy, and benefits all New Zealanders. Especially people who work in export industries (not just dairy), which will continue to boom under the increased demand. How does that hurt the "average New Zealander"? Making the country more wealthy benefits everyone.

This has absolutely nothing to do with the Iraq war. That's the most misguided reason I've ever heard for not supporting a trade agreement.

It's embarrassing that FTAs still make New Zealanders apoplectic with rage, when the benefits are obvious. What was the massive fallout from the agreement with China? None. Did the world end? No. Even if New Zealanders get "NOTHING. Zilch" out of it (which is a lie), they certainly aren't harmed. People like Danielle need to calm down.

Phillip   #9   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Tim Donoghue on the Dom. Post says it here about Miss Clarke's government, "...bilateral pact that has eluded her government for years, partly because of foreign policy issues including New Zealand's anti-nuclear policy".

Labour's anti-nuclear stance of the eighties was short sighted and has since created numerous stumbling blocks when negotiating progress with the states. Whether little ole NZ likes it or not, survival to a degree is determined by the global trading family.

CHARLES W. COOK   #8   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

POOR BABY----WATCH OUT OR A IMPERIALIST WILL GET YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Brennan   #7   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

This is easily one of the greatest achievements of the Clark government if it can be pulled off. Free trade with the USA will be a boon for both NZ producers and consumers, with imports cheaper and our exports having easier access to the US. Heavens, I'm no Labour supporter but this news is great!

Richard   #6   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

America is bankrupt, the country will financially collapse, so what is all the hype about a free trade deal with them? Are we supposed to be happy to be jumping into bed with a country that is bankrupt, and a country that is such a threat to world peace? Not only that, but traditionally those who have a free trade with America have been screwed over by the self serving lobby groups and have ended up having reduced trade with America after signing a deal. Run, run as fast as you can away from this self destructing fading empire that is America. The future for our markets is Asia, keep building and growing on that.

Scott   #5   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Well trade deal or not it's not going to change the position of the entrentched industry people in the US - they will still block out NZ industry from their turf no matter what the cost. A change in government (for either country) won't make an ounce of difference as they are not the people who actually make the decisions on what trade occurs - thats all by industry. It's ironic that the US champion free trade but are one of the most protected economies in the world.

RR   #4   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

If this free-trade deal goes through then it will benefit NZ greatly. We in future can design software for weapons and even maybe create new weapons to sell to both China and US competitively. Would put us in a central resources position and could be a potential Hong Kong/NY like trading post.


Show 1-3 of 13 comments
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you think a milk price war will erupt?

Yes, and about time

No

Don't care

Vote Result

Related story: Another shot fired in milk price battle

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content