BREAKING NEWS
Search for worker trapped in Waihi mine after accident ... Read more
Close

Pay spat puts spotlight on wider issue

SHANE COWLISHAW
Last updated 08:08 05/02/2014

Relevant offers

Better Business

Kiwi fashion designer Andrea Moore's new clothing line to be sold in Farmers YHA New Zealand hostels roll out $2.7m solar network South Canterbury couple get $27,000 compensation for unjustifiable dismissal Would your mum approve of your after-work behaviour? Susan Hornsby-Geluk: Workplace drug testing is not black and white The meaning of Starbucks' new employee dress code Better business performance means measuring what really matters Kiwis thought to be less likely to help themselves at self-service checkouts Tauranga buildings take on two different ways of working Business owners to be offered Air NZ Airpoints for property lease transactions

The issue of pay equity for women was like "Pandora's box" and would have to be opened at some point, the Court of Appeal has heard.

Rest home TerraNova Homes & Care is appealing against an Employment Court decision, which ruled women in female-dominated industries should be able to compare themselves to similarly skilled men in different industries.

The result of the case, which pits the Service and Food Workers Union against the aged-care sector, could have a drastic impact on other professions such as nursing, cleaning and early childhood education.

The case was fronted by Kristine Bartlett, a Lower Hutt employee of TerraNova who said she would be paid more than her $14.46 hourly wage if caregivers were mostly male rather than female.

TerraNova's lawyer Harry Waalkens told the Court of Appeal yesterday the Employment Court had misinterpreted the issue.

It was unfair to compare two different industries, which was like comparing "apples and oranges".

"The Employment Court, with all due respect, was completely wrong to dismiss this evidence."

But union lawyer Peter Cranney said women's work had traditionally been seen as less important and skilful than industries dominated by men.

Under questioning, Cranney said the case was not just about money but the quality of life and dignity the 20,000-odd female caregivers deserved.

"During discrimination cases Pandora's box always has to be opened, it always does.

"Removing discrimination is always difficult . . . I'm old enough to remember the first Maori woman who said kia ora on the telephone, it was almost a national crisis."

When asked why the court was being asked to change a piece of legislation that had not been questioned since its inception in 1972, Cranney said that times had changed and the world's view on the issue had shifted.

Several parties, including Business NZ and the New Zealand Aged Care Association, appeared as intervenors yesterday.

Crown Law also appeared at the request of Attorney-General Chris Finlayson.

The court reserved its decision.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content