A flag for all New Zealand
It will be a fine sight to see the Tino Rangatiratanga flag flying high from Auckland Harbour Bridge on Waitangi Day.
It's a distinctive flag - unambiguously Maori - and associated with the Maori nationalist revival of the past 40 years. But it's also unambiguously New Zealand with its central koru design.
Inevitably it's a controversial decision and since it was made there have been two main elements to the criticism. First, some Maori spokespeople would prefer to see an alternative flag flying; second, Labour MP Shane Jones has criticised the flag as a Maori Party flag. He calls it "Hone's flag" - referring to Maori Party MP Hone Harawira, who was previously a leader of the Maori protest group Te Kawariki, which used the flag as a symbol of Maori resistance.
When the Government approved the flying of a Maori flag from Auckland Harbour Bridge and official government buildings on Waitangi Day, Prime Minister John Key said it should be a consensus decision as to which flag was chosen. A series of hui around the country showed strong support (80%) for the "tino" flag. A minority of Maori voices supported other options - the strongest contender being the flag of the United Tribes of Aotearoa, which was adopted in the 1830s after the British colonials encouraged Maori to formally declare sovereignty over the country ahead of an expected French attempt to claim the same.
In terms of Waitangi Day symbolism the most appropriate pairing would be the 1835 flag of the United Tribes and the Union Jack because each of these is a flag that most closely represents each of the two Treaty partners who signed on February 6, 1840, to create the founding document of the country.
We shouldn't be surprised at the various voices from within Maoridom on the issue. John Key was never going to get the consensus he wanted. Why would he expect Maori to speak with one voice when Pakeha speak with so many? Maori are as divided as Pakeha on most issues.
The criticism from Shane Jones is simply political point-scoring. He often now takes the role left vacant by the departure of Winston Peters, who spoke out forcefully against expressions of Maori nationalism, likening it more than once to South Africa's former apartheid system. Jones dog-whistles pretty much the same tune. He's the Maori every prejudiced Pakeha likes to listen to. In this case he's serving no purpose other than massaging the disgruntlement of potential Labour voters.
In today's New Zealand Herald columnist Brian Rudman suggests the Tino Rangatiratanga flag be adopted as the official New Zealand flag. He says we should "fold up the borrowed British naval ensign we've been making do with for 100 years, store it on a museum shelf and ... hijack the Maori sovereignty flag as the New Zealand sovereignty flag".
I agree. Let's claim this fine, dramatic flag as our own uniquely New Zealand flag and set aside the colonial hand-me-down with its Union Jack and tacked-on stars.
Why not?
Sponsored links
I agree that we should adopt a new national flag however, I don't believe that the 'Tino...' flag is entirely appropriate. Not because of the association with Maori nationalism (which I support mostly) but, because it doesn't fully acknowledge the part played by other nations who contributed to our history- Pakeha, Chinese et al. However, I have no objections to it flying at Waitangi- it's all we have for now. I would like to see a national flag that incorporates elements of Maori design as well as non Maori. So, John, get ready, the fur is about to fly on this issue!
I quite like that Tino Rangatiratanga flag, but i dont think that it is truely representitive of all new zealanders.
I for one am quite happy to see this fly alongside the current NZ flag.
But how about a national competition to find a truely unique NZ flag. One that incorporates our shared history (good and bad),
sometyhing we could all be proud of.
for once John, a nice reasoned article.
Why not?
Because this flag, even more so than the current one is divisive, a symbol of hatred and separatism hailed by shirt stirring morons as fine and dramatic.
Only in Minto's screwed up world could anyone dream that a flag which is representative of such a small segment of the population would be seen as a good candidate for a nation's flag. I'm surprised he hasn't suggested the EPMU logo...
I agree with MattyH. How can you have a symbol of a country that only a portion or a portion of the country identifies with? It is a symbol of separation when we need a symbol unity.
As long as it doesn't have that stupid Union Jack on it, it will do.
Flags are of Egyptian heritage -what are you proposing next-Maoris' to have own Chinese dialect-----can't we just move onto something more serious-like 'freedom of opportunity'-it is a bit more cohesive ,humane and PROGRESSIVE.
Were we to vote I would vote to stick with the current flag.
If we got rid of it I would prefer it to be the Silver Fern on black background. Simple yet distinctive.
Field Marshall- we can always rely on you to be irrelevant and incomprhensible!
From TV to a tent: Family of eight evicted
Mallard sells festival tickets online at profit
Robyn Malcolm lays it all bare
Pub owners give up, open kindergarten
Adele's ex-boyfriend deserves credit
4.1 quake rattles Christchurch
Telecom sorry for tactless calls to widow
Should you take your groom's name?
Can Paris Hilton save her image?
From the annoying to the dangerous
Royal wedding Barbie dolls for sale
Extended Rocks Rd work frustrates users
Newest First
Oldest First
No. Not this flag. Although we deserve a lot better flag than we currently have, this flag isn't the one to use.
It is a sovereignty flag for a splinter group of maori who want their own nation. It demands a new form of apartheid.
That wont do. We need a flag for all New Zealanders.