Stomach stapling, school lunches and hypocrisy

Last updated 13:26 27/01/2010

With her announcement this week that she's had a stomach-stapling operation, Education Minister Anne Tolley has labelled herself a hypocrite.

Tolley's changeIn February last year the minister stood alongside Health Minister Tony Ryall as they announced that the Government was removing the healthy-food requirement for school tuckshops. The policy had been put in place by Labour and required schools to sell healthy foods and limit the sale of the likes of donuts, sausage rolls and meat pies.

The policy was a response to growing alarm at the prevalence of unhealthy food in kids' lives and the obesity epidemic which is swamping low-income communities.

Via her stomach stapling operation the minister admits she has issues with food intake and weight to the extent she paid tens of thousands of dollars for an interventionist operation. But what about the millions who can't afford it? Presumably Tolley thinks such people and their children should "get hard", eat the right foods and exercise. These things didn't work for the minister so why should they be the only option for those on low and middle incomes? And why should the minister make it harder for parents and children to eat healthily just because she doesn't have to worry?

The healthy food requirements were working and the Government decision was purely ideological. Schools reported the guidelines resulted in improved behaviour and concentration for kids (something a minister of education should welcome) but these gains are being eroded.

Just this week public health nutritionist Bronwen King says that since the healthy food requirement was lifted, old unhealthy habits are creeping back in. For example, previously parents found it easier to pack healthy lunches at home when they knew the school was doing the same. Now the pressure is going back on from kids who want donuts because that's what the school is selling other kids.

It's all very well to say parents should monitor what their kids eat but the Government is making parents' job that much harder. Like Labour before it, the Government also refuses to curb advertisements targeting kids with unhealthy food.

It's called setting parents and schools up to fail.

The region with the greatest obesity problem is South Auckland but the Counties Manukau District Health Board has funding for fewer than 100 operations each year.

Anne Tolley should explain why she took an easy option while making it harder for everyone else.

Follow NZStuffBlogs on Twitter and get fast updates on all Stuff's blogs.

107 comments
Post a comment
eddie   #1   01:39 pm Jan 27 2010

I was lead to believe the 'healthy lunchbox' was not greeted with that much enthusiasm by the teachers Mr Minto, as they had an extra duty, forced upon them, to become 'lunchbox archeologists' and dig around to get rid of anything that was deemed unhealthy.

Or have I got that wrong and teachers were all for the change?

lou   #2   01:46 pm Jan 27 2010

You're totally right. there was no reason to remove the healthy lunch initiative. Anne Tolley is shockingly bad at her job.

Petra   #3   01:53 pm Jan 27 2010

I've read a lot about nutrition and the huge increase in obesity in the last few decades. Research has shown that two things work to curb overeating. The first is to devote as much television air time to promoting healthful foods as is devoted to foods high in sugar and fat. That means advertising whole foods such as vegetables and fruits. The second is to make unhealthful food less accessible. That doesn't mean selling healthful foods alongside those high in sugar and fat - people simply buy the less healthful items (think McDonalds and the small turnover of salads). Unhealthful foods must be taken off the menu in order to change eating patterns. I was very happy when the food standards were introduced to schools, and very disappointed, and a little angry, when these standards were repealed.

gitmo   #4   01:53 pm Jan 27 2010

Interesting that the best outcomes of enforced diet are from Cuba during the blockade massive decreases in the rates of cardiovascular disease, diabetes etc

Perhaps we should enforce a similar blockade in NZ .. go on John you know you want to turn NZ into the Cuba of the South seas.

ken   #5   01:53 pm Jan 27 2010

This really is the lowest of the low. It is no-one's business why Anne Tolley chose this option, that's between her and her Dr. Several other MP's have also mainly for health issues. Maybe they have private health insurance and can aford it?? Parents have choices and so do the schools. They have chosen not to maintain healthy eating options; does the government have to regulate everything? Only in John Minto's ideal socialist utopia it seems. Nothing is stopping schools from continuing healthy options, some it seems have simply made the choice not to. I made a choice to reheat the pizza left overs and have that for lunch today. Tomorrow i'll make sandwiches. That is what life's about, the choices you make. I make my choices and all the advertising and government regulation won't change that one bit. The same goes for every other person in this country apart from those who don't take responsibility for their choices/actions and then blame someone else i.e. advertising or the government. you are what you eat.

Stately   #6   01:56 pm Jan 27 2010

I wish people would stop calling it 'stomach stapling'. You either have a gastric band, gastric bypass or gastric sleeve resection. No 'stomach stapling' has been done since the 80's.

All 3 of those ops are different and have different outcomes.

Dandy   #7   01:57 pm Jan 27 2010

Blimey, for once I agree (to a point) John... Not with regard to selling only healthy food at schools (as I grew up on pie and chip school lunches) but in the easy option comment. I think is pretty disgusting when you choose abdominal surgery over simple food choice/portion control.

When will people learn that the fat on their bellys, thighs, wherever ALL went on through the mouth...? If you are a porker, just lay off the crap food and run (or waddle) around a bit people. It's not magic, and sadly in some poorer areas it seems to be the norm. I despair at the lifestyle of those idly stuffing snacks down gullets while lounging about, and wonder if the beneficiary system has created these poor role models, seemingly destined to repeat their poor lifetsyle choice down the generations...?

B   #8   01:59 pm Jan 27 2010

Couldn't agree more, my kids luckily go to a school where they offer healthy choices so do not have the negative affects of some other school tuck shops. I was disappointed to hear that National had decided not to go ahead with the changes that Labour had begun. Not only does the sale of junk food during school hours contribute to disruptive behaviour among some children it also encourages children to make unhealthy food choices even when their parents are making the right ones. I have seen the food that some schools offer kids from tuck shops and it has shocked me. Much of that food I consider to be treat food and only suitable for birthday parties etc. The food often sold in tuck shops also contradicts what teachers try to teach their students within class hours about nutrition and exercise and must be very frustrating for them also.

Kara   #9   01:59 pm Jan 27 2010

Regardless of whether the teachers greeted the healthy lunchbox with enthusiasm or not, it was for the benefit of the kids. Its the kids that will suffer not only in the short term from the junk thats available but also the in the long term when they will be knocking on Anne Tolley's door asking for a tummy operation too!

Come on!

Pete   #10   01:59 pm Jan 27 2010

Another column full of hard-left dribble from the king of ideology, Mr Rent-a-protest.


Show 11-60 of 107 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content