Bravo, domebusters

Last updated 10:20 18/03/2010

What a delight it was to hear the jury's not-guilty verdict in the trial of the three gutsy domebusters in Wellington District Court yesterday.

Catholic priest Father Peter Murnane, teacher Adrian Leason and Hokianga farmer Sam Land were charged with using slashers to deflate the rubber dome covering one of the satellite dishes at the Waihopai spy base near Blenheim two years ago. The three are part of the Ploughshares Catholic activist movement whose members have undertaken similar anti-war actions in other countries.

The three freely admitted they did the damage claimed but their defence was an elegant and courageous expression of otherwise illegal action taken to prevent much greater crimes against people. The three told the court they acted to save the lives of those who are endangered by United States intelligence gathered from the base.

The spy base is nominally run by the GCSB (Government Communications Security Bureau) but is - in all but name - a United States spy base operating on New Zealand soil. It is clear from research here and overseas that it is operated in the US national interest - both militarily and commercially. Other similar bases are operated around the world with Waihopai being part of this secret global surveillance network set up after WWII under the UKUSA treaty, which involves the US, UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.

The base was built during the term of the fourth Labour government when Dave Lange was prime minister as well as minister in charge of security and intelligence. Despite this Lange says in the foreword to Nicky Hager's 1996 book Secret Power "...it was not until I read this book that I had any idea that we had been committed to an international integrated electronic network".

This is a startling admission. Our own prime minister was deliberately misled about the base by New Zealand security officials who saw their first responsibility being to their United States handlers rather than New Zealand's national interests.

The satellite tracking dishes at Waihopai focus on communications satellites in geostationary orbit above the equator and take in the signals from every email, phone call, fax or other communication which passes through the satellite. These messages are searched using code words and phrases, the majority of which are provided by the US, which includes commercially sensitive material on trade and investment as well as diplomatic communications between governments. Also picked up are international communications involving New Zealanders. (Each state in the network denies spying on its own citizens but are known to request others in the network to spy for them.)

In the late 1990s European Parliamentarians held a parliamentary inquiry into the "commercial espionage" conducted by the UKUSA network. In particular it was alleged the European companies Airbus Industries and Thomson-CSF were monitored through the network to favour US companies gaining commercial contracts.

The military links are also clear. It's well documented the network was used to spy on UN Security Council member countries to try to get support for a UN resolution to back the invasion on Iraq. In January 2003, shortly before the Iraq invasion, a leaked memo from Frank Koza, head of the Regional Targets section at the US National Security Agency, requested a "surge" of surveillance about the diplomatic communications of UN Security Council members. Countries to be targeted particularly were Angola, Cameroon and Guinea. Also requested was information on domestic communications of non-UN Security Council members containing anything relating to the Security Council. Koza said the NSA wanted information on the countries' "negotiating positions, alliances and dependencies". The US was looking for pressure points to target countries and undermine opposition to American war plans.

At Waihopai New Zealanders would have done Frank Koza's bidding and the NSA request would have been met in full. Our prime minister at the time, Helen Clark, would have been unaware of this request or that New Zealand security officials were an active part of the US strategy for war against Iraq while our government officially opposed the invasion.

The defence that the domebusters presented to the jury was well founded. Waihopai is our greatest contribution to US global strategies and ties us into the US war machine. Its activity threatens lives around the world. How many innocent people have been killed through the US invasion and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan which Waihopai assisted?

The Kiwi trio on trial this week deserve applause for their courage in stripping this base to its bare essentials and exposing its undemocratic and immoral purposes. The slashers they used should be on permanent display at Te Papa.

The UK had the dambusters - New Zealand has the domebusters.

» Follow NZStuffBlogs on Twitter and get fast updates on all Stuff's blogs.

221 comments
Post a comment
cm   #1   10:38 am Mar 18 2010

This validates the Robin Hood defence and vigilantes. Steal from a bank and give the proceeds to the needy. Fine, you did it for the greater good. Kill a drug dealer or tagger. Fine he should not be dealing drugs or tagging and the world is a better place.

God might have told them to do it, but listening to your imaginary friends should not be allowed as an excuse, except maybe on the grounds of mental competence.

This is a bad decision.

Doug   #2   10:40 am Mar 18 2010

hmm so I wonder what I can get away with if I truely believe I'm doing it for a greater good.

Mike   #3   10:43 am Mar 18 2010

I find it highly ironic that John lauds these men - In John's socialist paradise these guuys would have been in a gulag long ago.

It is only western liberal democracies that have to suffer their stupidity. When they have destroyed their ability to defend themselves (ie our ability to defend ourselves - these men want the world to disarm....but they can only actualy influence WLD's) they will find that what comes next is not too tolerant of their ideas.

Sean   #4   10:49 am Mar 18 2010

They do not deserve applause, they do not deserve to get off. There is not courageous about common gutter vandlilsm you idot. GOD help us if we allow you and your mates to run around doing what the hell you like. I am Disgusted!

eddie   #5   10:50 am Mar 18 2010

Ohhh my, I'll bet your hands were shaking with glee as you wrote that piece Mr Minto.

This verdict will be overturned on appeal, as it should be! it sets a dangerous precident.

I couldn't care less about the Waihoai spy base, but if it stops even 1 muslim terrorist, it's worth it....if it helps kill Iraqi insurgents, it's worth it.

Anon   #6   10:51 am Mar 18 2010

John, This is a really stupid decision by the courts! It now means that if some meat-head decides that 'it's for the greater good' they can commit any crime that they feel like and use this as precedent. To take an extreme example, someone murders a child molester and claims that they did it 'for the greater good of the children' - yay welcome to the wild west with mob-rule. They should have (at least) been fined for the cost of repairs, even if it bankrupted them, so that the tax-payer didn't need to pick up the cost of their willful vandalism.

Ken   #7   10:51 am Mar 18 2010

And what about the lives that they have saved. This decision puts us onto a very slippery slope indeed. If I kill a drug dealer because they were selling drugs to my children, can I then use the excuse that 'I was saving lives?'. I would hope not. These people committed a crime and should be prepared to pay the penalty. Could they now go onto a NZ military base and blow up barracks because of our involvement in Afghanistan - what happens if they were caught and perhaps roughed up during their arrest.

samm   #8   10:56 am Mar 18 2010

Comparing the 'domebusters' to the Dam Busters is ill considered, given that the dams raid, while spectacular and a morale and propaganda win for the british, resulted in at least 1600 deaths, the majority being non-combatants, a large number of which where either POW's or foreign forced labourers, with a neglible direct effect on Germany's war effort, at great cost to the participating aircrew (who I am not trying to slight or judge in any way). It was a great feat of arms and a great story, but a lot of the details and consequences have become obscured by myth.

Dandy   #9   10:57 am Mar 18 2010

So if I burnt down (for example) a labour/green party head office with all members inside because I thought they were ruining the country I would get off and john minto would applaud me...?

horrible, horrible precedent set here...

m0rph3us   #10   11:00 am Mar 18 2010

Let's just say someone smashed your computer John, believing it to be in the greater good. Would you be as happy about that?


Show 11-60 of 221 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content