Council disputes One Plan scenarios

MARTY SHARPE
Last updated 05:00 20/11/2012

Relevant offers

Farming

Bad weather renders seeds worthless Honey is the bees knees for sibling apiarists Sharing produces rewards Get worries out in the open, far from any clifftops UK farmers told to stop bleating about NZ lamb Fonterra cuts blamed on botulism scare Decision thwarts Ngai Tahu dairy plans Rural women point water woes finger at townies Farmer injured by bull Farmers urged to pay up for $2m dairy hub

The Primary Industries Ministry was using "extreme scenarios" when working out the cost to farmers of the One Plan court ruling, according to emails obtained by The Dominion Post.

The emails reveal concerns raised by Horizons regional council after Federated Farmers spoke publicly about leaked memos showing that farmers' costs could rise by 22 per cent to 43 per cent if the ruling was implemented.

The figures were said to have come from a Landcare Research report commissioned by the ministry.

Horizons chairman Bruce Gordon raised his concerns with Landcare Research chief executive Richard Gordon this month. Richard Gordon sent an email to the ministry's deputy director-general of policy, Paul Stocks, to advise him that none of eight scenarios considered were the same as the court ruling's.

The scenarios resulting in 22 per cent to 43 per cent cuts to profit were "extreme" and "actually bear little similarity to the One Plan", Richard Gordon said. The scenario most similar to the One Plan would have an impact on profitability of less than 1 per cent.

He received a response from the ministry's director of resource policy, Mike Jebsen, who said the scenario mentioned in the memos was "in our view most closely matched the Environment Court direction".

Asked about Landcare's email yesterday, Mr Jebsen said the 22 to 43 per cent figures were the best indication of likely impact.

In September, the court, having heard from five economists from Fonterra, Horticulture NZ, Fish & Game and two from Horizons, concluded the effect on farmers would be an average of 5 per cent of annual expenses.

The court concluded the region had "urgent water quality issues that require immediate action" and failure to try to reverse the decline would be "inexcusable".

Federated farmers and Horticulture NZ appealed against the decision.

ORIGINAL PLAN

The One Plan as originally notified by Horizons included a regulatory regime based on the type of land and soil on a farm (land use capability) and limiting nitrogen leaching (among other things).

A commissioners' hearing removed the LUC and limits on nitrogen leaching for existing dairy farming but retained the approach for conversions.

The commissioners' decision was the subject of an appeal by 20 parties, some of which were unhappy with the removal of LUC.

The Environment Court ruled the LUC and nitrogen leaching limits needed to be brought back into the plan for both existing farming activities and conversions, to provide certainty and equity.

Ad Feedback

They are now included in the plan, which has been redrafted and is back before the court.

- The Dominion Post

Special offers
Opinion poll

What is the main issue for farmers in the upcoming General Election?

Environmental policies that stigmatise farmers and erode income.

The high exchange rate.

Slow progress in upgrading rural broadband.

Rural communities under-represented in Parliament.

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

rural digi editions 4/9

Digital editions

Read our rural publications online