Solid Energy confirms job losses

SARAH-JANE O'CONNOR
Last updated 14:46 27/06/2014

Relevant offers

Industries

Venture capitalists could be 'crowded out' by Crown company, says industry body Clothes trading post Designer Wardrobe looks for Aussie conquest KFC, Pizza Hut, Carl's Jr, Starbucks workers strike for pay rise, restaurants feeling the heat Jamie Oliver's NZ plans uncertain as he narrowly avoids Australian collapse All the motoring metal at Shanghai - and what's coming to New Zealand Vote of confidence for parking systems firm Frogparking KFC, Pizza Hut, Carls Jr, Starbucks workers go on strike Scores of job losses expected at Orion Health Fuji Xerox New Zealand's parent company estimates $285m losses caused by accounting irregularities Super Fund suffers setback with 'expansion capital' strategy after write-off

Solid Energy has confirmed it will go ahead with a planned restructure which will see 185 employees and contractors be made redundant.

Solid Energy chief executive Dan Clifford said some changes had been made to the proposal following consultation.

Two fewer positions will be made redundant than originally proposed.

The company will now undertake a selection process to decide who will stay on at the mine. The process was expected to be completed by the end of July.

Engineers, Printing and Manufacturing Union (EPMU) West Coast organiser Garth Elliott said it was a "sad day for our miners".

"We knew it was coming, but it's still a heavy blow."

Miners would now be able to apply for voluntary redundancy.

"But there still aren't a lot of jobs out there on the West Coast and when that money runs out things will get tough," Elliott said.

The EPMU said mismanagement by Solid Energy's previous board had led to the current struggles.

"We hold the Government accountable for Solid Energy's current position, and for not addressing the high dollar or creating jobs in our region. Miners are now paying the price for the politicians' inaction."

Coal production will reduce by 500,000 tonnes, to 1.4 million tonnes per year.

When the company announced the proposal on June 6, it cited low international coal prices as the reason for the change.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content