Migrant layoffs examined

CECILE MEIER
Last updated 05:00 03/07/2014

Relevant offers

Industries

Auckland Port opponents still poised for action Animal testing of cosmetics ban proposed Neighbourly passes 100,000 members McDonald's New Zealand keeps eye on all day breakfast trial in US Liquidators consider suing Albany Heights lawyers Canterbury mayors attack Air New Zealand plans Hillend managers won't face charges after smoky burnoff on Sam Morgan property Air New Zealand ends Christchurch Tokyo flights Supermarkets stay vigilant over 1080 baby formula threat Logging firm Waimea Contract Carriers calls in administrators

The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has confirmed it is investigating Buildtech's redundancies of migrant staff.

"MBIE is aware of allegations about Buildtech and is making inquiries," a spokesperson said.

The Press reported yesterday that seven migrant workers were upset after losing their jobs with building company Buildtech less than halfway through their three-year contracts.

Buildtech confirmed it had made five Filipino staff redundant as the company was reshaping its workforce. It also had not extended two employees' contracts beyond their 90-day trial period.

The company said its work was changing from mainly under-cap insurance repairs to over-cap repairs and rebuilds.

One of the affected staff, speaking anonymously, said most workers had paid fees of about $8000 back in the Philippines to secure a visa and a three-year contract.

Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union construction organiser Paul Johnston said Buildtech should not be allowed to hire any more migrants if they made some redundant.

An Immigration NZ spokesperson said it agreed that companies should not be hiring more migrant workers for positions that have previously made redundant.

Buildtech director Israel Cooper said Buildtech had not recruited overseas since November last year. It was now looking to fill five positions including plumbers and electricians.

The restructure had followed a three-month review.

Six of seven affected staff had already received other offers of employment.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content