Builders 'put at risk' by shoddy scaffolding

ROB KIDD
Last updated 10:49 16/07/2014

Relevant offers

Industries

Wellington industrial properties up for sale drop, investors slow to buy Auckland-based institution buys Wellington's Karori Mall for $22 million NZ one of world's most competitive economies: World Economic Forum Retailers leave as uncertainty reigns about Otaki's retail future Prime Minister opens state of the art fish oil processing plant in Nelson Council staff furious at CEO's 11 per cent rise when they were offered just 1.7 per cent Argentinian buyers of Onetai Station get two warnings from OIO Start of Snapper sustainability measures welcomed by local fishers No excuses for low punches to boxing's bottom line, says Sky Receiver selling undeveloped Lower Hutt site linked to former Kirkcaldie & Stains chairman

An Auckland building company has been fined $15,000 and told it "failed its workers" after allowing them to work at heights without adequate scaffolding.

WorkSafe New Zealand prosecuted Eden Homes Development after its employees Wei Qiang Sun and Ming Han were seen installing a roof in Glenfield without adequate edge-protection to help prevent falls.

No accident actually happened but Eden Homes was fined $15,000 in the North Shore District Court for failing to take all practicable steps to ensure the safety of its employees.

Scaffolding at the site was incomplete, and only provided protection for the first level of the construction site.

It was arranged by the homeowner, not Eden Homes.

WorkSafe NZ's Chief Investigator Keith Stewart said making the pair work at height without the appropriate scaffolding put them at real and unacceptable risk.

"Eden Homes Development should have ensured the scaffolding and edge protection was complete and adequate before allowing work to commence," he said.

"What is more, the company also failed to provide its workers with any other equipment to protect them and minimise the risk of falls in the absence of proper edge protection.

"Eden Homes Development also should have had a clear policy that employees will not carry out work at height if edge or fall protection is not in place. Quite simply, the company failed its workers.

"It was only a matter of good luck rather than good management that no-one was hurt in this case. This prosecution serves as a strong reminder to everyone in the building industry of the importance of ensuring they have proper protections in place before beginning any work at height," Stewart said.

Ad Feedback
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content