Fined for polluting Duvauchelle Bay

SHELLEY ROBINSON
Last updated 13:43 25/08/2014
Duvauchelle Bay pollution
Supplied

POLLUTED: Sediment poured into Duvauchelle Bay.

Relevant offers

Industries

Webstock technology conference brings high drama to the stage of the St James Spark seeks injunction to prevent Sky/Vodafone 'fait accompli' 'Spy doll' pulled from shelves in Germany Beauty salon fined after using banned substance to apply acrylic nails Oxford professor sees entrepreneurship and science hand-in-hand Mondelez's global $4 billion cost-cutting drive behind Dunedin Cadbury factory closure Government is 'wasting money' on oil companies who have already ditched NZ - Green MP Whittaker's won't step into the Dunedin chocolate void left by Cadbury New Zealand directors worried by everyday risks Workplace leaders need to be better prepared for jobs disruption

Two Canterbury businesses have been fined $52,500 for allowing dirty run off from a housing development into Duvauchelle Bay, near Akaroa on Banks Peninsula.

>Share this story on Facebook.

Sicon Fergus Ltd and Tresta Holdings Ltd pleaded guilty in June for breaches of the Resources Management Act.

Scion was fined $30,000 and Tresta $22,000. A third company, Elliot Sinclair and Partners Ltd was found not guilty in the case.

Click here to read the judge's sentencing notes.

The sediment came from the Totara Drive subdivision, sited on a hill overlooking Duvauchelle Bay.

Environment Canterbury (ECan), which prosecuted the companies, said both had disregarded "good advice" from officials and had been warned.

ECan director resource management Kim Drummond said: "The plume of dirty water that was washed into Duvauchelle Bay last May was a direct result of these companies disregarding good advice and not taking the appropriate steps to lessen the risk posed by forecasted poor weather.

"Erosion and sediment control is a critical factor in any works near water and they neglected to follow the plans laid out which would have stopped this from happening."

Judge John Hassan in his sentencing said neither company sought to deliberately pollute the environment and blamed errors of judgement.

"Neither Sicon or Tresta sought to deliberately pollute the environment. However, in various respects each of you demonstrated deliberateness in departing from your legal obligations.

Drummond said the case was a reminder to developers they have obligations to the environment. 

"We don't like to see our waterways treated this way and if we find it happening we'll take those responsible to task over it."

The cultural impact of the incident on Te Runanga o Ōnuku was considered by Judge Hassan.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content