Telecom board defends pay

Last updated 07:12 26/08/2009
TEL 2.145 -0.02 -0.69%
TEL

Click for a detailed chart

Related Links

Line engineers strike action continues Telecom's $7 million man

Relevant offers

Industries

Holiday parks enjoy growth Christmas contributes to flat December figures Glitch hits Westpac's online banking Xero founders sell off shares Pulp mill fined $37,000 over worker's fall Tournament Parking buys Auckland's Victoria Quarter Freeview adds new channel Quake still taking its toll on accommodation sector Pre-pay glitch as Vodafone loses customers Dream Homes comes to a halt

Telecom's board has defended million dollar-plus salary packages for several of its executives as lines engineers strike over planned changes to their work arrangements.

The company's annual report released yesterday detailed packages including over $5 million for chief executive Paul Reynolds and a total of over $11m for six other top executives.

The report for the financial year ending June 30 reported a 43.9 percent slump in the company's profits.

Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union (EPMU) national secretary Andrew Little said Dr Reynolds' payment could not be more insulting to the engineers.

Up to 1000 telecommunications engineers around the country staged a one-day strike this week as part of continued industrial action over plans to make the engineers owner/operators.

The engineers want their current employer, Telecom's network division Chorus, to abandon a contract agreement with Australian company Visionstream in Auckland and Northland.

The annual report put Chorus chief executive Mark Ratcliffe's package at over $1.9m, while the packages of five other executives ranged from $1.4m to nearly $2.6m.

Chief financial officer Russ Houlden's package included $281,273 for accommodation and "some relocation and personal travel costs".

Telecom board chairman Wayne Boyd defended the payments , saying the company had met all its financial targets in the year to June 30, while making significant progress in other areas.

"Under Paul Reynolds' leadership, our executive team has delivered on the demanding objectives set by the board over the past year," Mr Boyd said.

He said Telecom had gone through unprecedented upheaval over the past three years while moving into an era of operational separation, and had responded well.

Mr Boyd said New Zealanders relied on the telecommunications infrastructure and in the year to June 30, Telecom's total capital investment amounted to $1.3 billion.

The company had successfully launched its XT mobile network in May and customer uptake had exceeded expectations.

"Progress on our fibre-to-the-node rollout is well advanced, bringing fast broadband to more New Zealanders than ever before."

Mr Boyd said customer satisfaction had also improved.

"Against this backdrop of achievement, the rewards given to our executive team are fair recognition for the outstanding job they have done as leaders."

Mr Little said while hundreds of frontline Telecom workers were having their livelihoods and work rights stripped from them, Telecom was being driven by shameless greed and a disregard for the network they were entrusted with.

Under Visionstream, engineers would have to provide their own equipment and transportation, which the EPMU said would leave many staff jobless and put the future of New Zealand's telecommunications network at risk.

Labour MP Darien Fenton agreed Mr Reynolds' package was a "bitter pill" for workers facing lay-offs with no redundancy pay.

"While some of the lines engineers have already been laid off without redundancy pay, others will be losing their jobs in a month's time," Ms Fenton said.

Ad Feedback

"The exorbitant salary sends a terrible message to Telecom's workers. It also sends a strong message that there are two standards of fairness -- one if you are a highly-paid executive and another if you are an ordinary worker."

NZPA

75 comments
Post a comment
Spongebob   #75   11:48 am Aug 27 2009

This is to Amanda. Amanda you have NO idea about this situation with the Techs/Engineers do you? The alternative they are being offered is to get into debt, & to be available for work 12 hours a day, 7 days a week with NO guarantee of work or code prices. The prices that have been worked out equate to less than $5 an hour in some cases. Which is illegal. Would you put up $60k of your own money for a business plan that your accountant & lawyer has said is flawed and will cost you money? I don't think so. Please educate yourself first before spouting absolute rubbish.

Peter   #74   09:07 am Aug 27 2009

Wake up NZ and smell the broadband ... NZ is in the sh^t and we need good econmoic performance .... companies performing well .... strong and creative leadership ... well done Telecom on its results, and Paul Reynolds seems to be making a huge impact. Corporate culture is, pretty much, everything in driving and sustaining good performance - this is what good leaders get paid good dosh for in an international market. It is no wonder our country is lagging with such narrow-minded bleating as in most of these comments - comments that desire mediocrity in corporate performance ... prob the same people that want the health budget to grow more without thinking that corporate taxes (yup, good company performance) are needed to pay for it. Wake up NZ.

Nige   #73   08:09 am Aug 27 2009

In this society we have created (you included) there are a lot of inequities, hard working nurses, inspirational teachers, community sports coaches being some obvious ones, telecom engineers not so. If you have only the skills to sweep streets and flip burgers like a "real worker" you will be rewarded very little. I you study hard, word smart and can gain the skills and experience to prove you have the capacity to effect great change, deal with rampant egos, people, politicians and complex decision making, you will do well.

If all you can do is knock these sort of people because their skills are so rare they command a magnificent salary, sorry folks, but you are another narrow minded whinger. If this outrages you, go improve yourself, work hard, respect others and celebrate the efforts of those who do like wise.

John R   #72   09:02 pm Aug 26 2009

Well I am a telecom shareholder, currently holding 151,000 TEL shares, I'm completely satisfied with Paul's remnueration package, what he is doing for the company and it's owners is fantastic and I think he's worth every penny. If we paid peanuts, we'd get another monkey, we don't want to go back to those days. To recruit someone of his calibre you need to pay an international CEO salary, I'm sorry, but that's what it costs and all you wingers should get over it, the reality is that it's not costing you any more, it's costing me as a shareholder, if you are not a shareholder then you have nothing to complain about.

Peter   #71   08:04 pm Aug 26 2009

I'm prepared to take $2.5m to halve profits next year!

Cath   #70   06:50 pm Aug 26 2009

Comment 61 says "@ Jo - and hence I don't use any of Telecom's services. They are rubbish so why should someone be paid that sum for dismal broadband and poor pricing plans." and I agree, there are plenty of great smaller ISP's out there with competitive prices and fantastic service, we voted with our feet and now use www.netspeed.net.nz in Chch

Susan   #69   06:12 pm Aug 26 2009

Most Telecom staff were told because of economic downturn there would not be any pay increases this year. This information came from the upper levels of the comany. PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH.

PCc   #68   03:57 pm Aug 26 2009

So how much do the CEOs of Telstraclear and Vodafone get paid - can't understand why telecom get singled out - guess what they haven't been part of the "Post office" for years and the lost my business years ago.

And how can Paul Little make any credible comments about CEOs paypackets - did he take a payvut when he took on the Labour Party Presidents role or are the members of the EPMU subsidising that role nowadays?

Or has the feedback on this topic been co-ordinated by those with a vested interest...

Amanda   #67   03:22 pm Aug 26 2009

Typical bad attitude of NZ'ers - can't handle it when people are more successful than they are so they try to tear them down. Plus has nobody noticed that Telecom isn't actually the employer of the linesmen? It's the companies like Downers, Transfield and Visionstream who employ them and control whether or not the workers get redundancy or not, not Telecom. I have a lot of sympathy for the tough situation that some workers are in, but did they forget signing the contract that contained no redundancy provisions? Or did they just forget to take out redundancy insurance? They would've known for ages that the previous contract their employers had with Telecom was due to expire be reviewed - yet it still didn't occur to them to do something about their own security? You don't hear LWW staff making such noise, and slinging media mud, or trying to blame their vendors for not ordering enough of their product - and those workers weren't even offered alternatives to redundancy! Everyone just wants to sling their mud at Telecom again. And half of you who think you don't use Telecom's services are probably fooling yourselves - you're just putting one more company in between Telecom and you as your middleman - in most areas it's probably still Telecom who paid for the infrastructure that you use, and the company that you're getting your services from in many cases is just a re-seller. But hey better to go and put your money with a global Giant based overseas like Vodafone right? Vodafone - who probably doesn't even bother investing in NZ infrastructure and creating the linesmen jobs in the first place? I'm sure they'll be laughing all the way to their foreign bank, esp. their CEO who's probably getting twice what Telecom's is. I also wonder if it has occurred to anyone that Telecom PLANNED to cut profit in favour of investment in Infrastructure. If they didn't invest, then maybe Mr. Reynolds could've increased profits by 1.3 Billion - against which his $5m package pales in insignificance.

CP   #66   02:35 pm Aug 26 2009

To compare a CEO's package in NZ with one in the USA or Europe is entirely irrelevant given the size of the markets they are dealing with. In NZ a $5M salary is outrageous and entirely unjustified. I totally agree with the poster above pointing out that Testra's CEO in Oz get $2M. Go figure.

And yes, I have long abandoned Telescum myself and can't wait for an unbundled network to become available in my area. Alas, Telescm still have the squeeze on and won't release their cabinets to competitors. Unbundling, yeah right! this is a Company who can only operate in a monopoly situation. They have not learnt to compete in a free market.

On another note, we have been waiting for a fault with our landline to be fixed since last Thursday. Thank you Mr. reynolds. You sure are up with the play in customer service!


Show 16-65 of 75 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content