Pay back security charges, say airlines

BY ROELAND VAN DEN BERGH
Last updated 05:00 21/12/2009

Relevant offers

Industries

Forsyth Barr bullish on NZ retailers Tag hails Taranaki oil success Kiwi sales put sparkle back in jeweller Heartland steering steadily to target Gold price bumps up miner's profit Companies struggle to raise value Telcos call for Crown company to be scrapped Second week-long strike for port No Kiwi jobs lost in call centre move: Orcon Council signs off on St Lukes mall plans

Airlines are demanding that the Government repay up to $36 million in overcharged airport security charges paid by passengers over the last two years.

The overcharge results from more passengers flying than anticipated.

The charges cover passenger and baggage screening at domestic and international airports by the Aviation Security Service for all aircraft with more than 90 seats. International passengers pay a $15 charge as part of their ticket price and domestic passengers are charged $4.66 on their fare.

Airlines want the money to be repaid to passengers over a maximum of two years by lowering the charge. Avsec has over-collected $26.2m in charges over the last two years. That amount is expected to grow to $36m by March next year. In the two years to June 30 passengers paid a total of $155m in security charges.

Avsec can recover only the cost of providing the screening services.

Aviation Industry Association chief executive Irene King says in a submission to an Avsec review obtained by The Dominion Post: "we are gravely concerned over both the amount of surplus and the speed with which it was accumulated".

Avsec began a review of the charge last month which includes a proposal to run down the surplus over the next three to six years. The review discussion document has not been made public.

But Ms King said the money must be repaid over the next year by nearly halving the charge on international fares to $8 and reduced it to $4 on domestic fares. Supporting a longer-term repayment plan would "condone an unlawful tax", she said.

Board of Airline Representatives executive director John Beckett said any reduction in the charge would be immediately passed on to passengers through lower fares. "This should have been corrected about a year ago. If a charge that is intended to recover the cost, does a lot more than recover the cost, that becomes a tax" which must be approved by Parliament, he said.Transport Minister Steven Joyce said the overcharging was the result of Avsec underestimating what it would collect during the recession. "They expected a far greater downturn in air travel ... That is part of where the blowout has come from," Mr Joyce said.

"There would be some questions asked" about Avsec's forecasting model. "It seems to me that they have overshot by a fair margin on this one," Mr Joyce said.

Avsec general manager Mark Everitt would not comment on the repayment proposals, but he said the review was needed "given we were in an over-recovery situation". The review was delayed pending the outcome of a separate Government review of domestic security after an alleged hijacking attempt of a regional Air New Zealand flight in February last year.

Ad Feedback

Avsec sets the security charge based on forecast of its costs over the next three years.

Ms King said Avsec's forecasting model "has a number of fundamental flaws" which appeared to overstate expected costs.

Avsec projections that its costs would increase by 15.4 per cent this year, followed by increases of up to 8.3 per cent in the subsequent three years "is unacceptably high" at a time of low inflation, Ms King said.

"There seems to be considerable padding in all of the numbers." Most of the increases are due to plans to employ another 71 staff over that time.

Given that international passenger numbers were expected to grow by just 1.11 per cent a year and domestic passengers by less than 2 per cent an increase in staffing was not justified, Ms King said.

Transport Ministry spokeswoman Lesley Reidy said a report and recommendation would go to Mr Joyce in February and new charges would take effect in April.

- © Fairfax NZ News

8 comments
Post a comment
DrD   #8   08:44 pm Dec 21 2009

Do I read the story correctly, the airlines want MY money back? As someone who has made plenty of flights to and from NZ in the last 10 years, if I have been ripped off by a government department (and it sure looks like it) then I want a repayment cheque. With all the huffing and puffing and passport recording customs do as you come and go, I would think it would be no trouble whatsoever to figure out who is owed what! I wait with great interest.....speaking of which......!

B.   #7   03:28 pm Dec 21 2009

Perhaps the 36m can be donated to the Govt Climate Change fund - haha. Or better yet, trade carbon with it..

SuziQ   #6   01:58 pm Dec 21 2009

I would like me refunds now not in the future, they owe me for 3 overseas trips and I could use that money now not wait until I fly again. The chance of getting a refund - zip.

em   #5   01:54 pm Dec 21 2009

Tell Avsec I want my nail clippers back too! Honestly, how many terrorists can hold up a plane armed with a pair of nail clippers?

Lou   #4   01:41 pm Dec 21 2009

If there has been overcharging I'd like a cheque thanks. I have made a significant amount of flights over the past few years and now intend to stay put. I don't see why I should make further flights simply in order to be recompensed.

Glen   #3   01:14 pm Dec 21 2009

Since I don't anticipate flying in the near future, taking advantage of the 'cheaper' fares, how can I go about getting my refund now?

MrMac   #2   01:00 pm Dec 21 2009

And the Airlines will refund that amount to use the fee-paying passengers? Yeah Right ...

Hey-nony-mouse   #1   12:57 pm Dec 21 2009

At least AvSec can manage to get enough money to pay their troops.

The Gov't other aviation arm - the Civil Aviation Authority - couldn't manage to sort itself out given a eyar's notice that Jetstar weer coming, locked themselves into a massively expensive new building just as budgets needed to be cut, and then told staff that their bad management and over-spending had nothing at all to do with no pay rise this year!

What a joke.

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content