Appeal court to hear Yellow Pages row
BY NICK KRAUSE
Relevant offers
Industries
A protracted legal battle between Yellow Pages Group and Australian company Yellowbook.com.au over intellectual property rights is heading to the Court of Appeal.
Plaintiffs Yellow Pages and YPG IP, which owns the registered trade marks for Yellow Pages and White Pages as well as associated domain names, filed proceedings against the Australian company and its head of advertising, marketing and design David Khoury in May 2007, alleging infringements under the Copyright Act.
The Yellow Pages Group claimed the Australian company breached copyright by reproducing YPG's listings and other classification data and distributing a Yellow Book directory and Yellow Duck directory of businesses.
Other causes of action allege trademark infringements, which include the colour yellow as used for its directories and breach of the Fair Trading Act.
The defendants deny any copyright breach saying the works are simply a database comprised from public information and that no skill or judgment was required to compile them.
The Australian company's lawyer, Auckland-based IP expert Clive Elliott, has already raised in the courts the Federal Court of Australia decision in a similar case in which Telstra alleged a copyright breach against Phone Directories Company.
But the Federal Court said there was no copyright because they were not original literary works.
The row was to have had a full hearing in the High Court at Auckland next month but that's been delayed following a case management conference today because of a pending hearing on two earlier decisions relating to the case.
Justice Mark Cooper delivered two decisions - one on May 31 and another on July 28 - ordering both parties to give paperwork each other requested on information about the databases.
''We're basically saying we want to know who the author of this database is and they're saying they don't have to provide that, '' Mr Elliott said.
A Court of Appeal hearing is expected early next year however YPG could still apply to have the trademark issue only dealt with separately by the High Court before then.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Another shot fired in milk price battle
Boardroom tensions surface at Tower meeting
Kiwi billionaire takes stake in Aussie timber firm
Slow progress on stadium, centre hit CBD
Minimum wage rises - by 50 cents
Weather, RWC take sparkle out of Rainbow's End
Energy advocate Barrie Leay dies
BHP profit goes backwards as costs rise
Yahoo chairman exits, review drags on
Stocks mixed as Greek fears sees gains sputter
Entrepreneurs benefit from lean times before cash flows
Brownlee slates mayor, council
Truck driver charged over school bus crash
Minimum wage rises - by 50 cents
Peters demands apology over Whanau Ora row
Kiwi billionaire takes stake in Aussie timber firm
Auckland into domestic one-day cricket final
Sportsman Steve Gurney 'grateful' for diversion
Rick Santorum wins Missouri primary
Another shot fired in milk price battle
Floods rage through NSW, Queensland
Stolen python gets its own back on thief
Indonesia tweeters fly in the face of censorship
Rogue Sevens tackler drank 24 beers
Drinking session ends in killing
Henry has dig at new employers
Minister embarrassed by navy boat crash
Diver's close encounter with great white
SBW's opponent hits floor at weigh-in
Critics dispute Family First findings on day care
IRD says job cut comments 'speculation'
Another shot fired in milk price battle
Tillman fighting for respect against SBW