Jackson: I feel enormous gratitude

TRACY WATKINS
Last updated 15:52 28/10/2010

PM says Hobbit staying

Opinion poll

Rate the deal the Government has cut to keep the Hobbit in NZ:

Excellent

Fair

A rip off

Vote Result

Related Links

PM says Hobbit staying Hobbit rallies John Key on The Hobbit negotiations Hobbits - it's all about the money Hobbit stars

Relevant offers

Industries

Waiver for independent director lapse Strong oil prices help lift NZOG into black Markets down on Fletcher Building stocks Chows escape prosecution for Settlement demolition Fletcher's net profit takes 13pc hit Large car sales on the rise Boom for services exports

Sir Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh have thanked the Government for introducing new laws to encourage movie bosses to shoot The Hobbit in New Zealand.

In a statement this afternoon, Jackson said he was grateful to the government for deciding to introduce the new legislation which would give "everyone in the film industry certainty as to their employment status."

"This clarification will provide much needed stability and reassurance for film workers as well as investors from within New Zealand and overseas," he said.

He also thanked Warner Brothers and New Line Cinema for their continued commitment to New Zealand, fans, and those in the industry.

"I feel enormous gratitude to the film technicians, actors and fans who came out in support of making these films in New Zealand. To the thousands of people who took the time to write and let us know they were with us - thank you. It made all the difference."

PARLIAMENT GOES INTO URGENCY

Parliament will be rushed into urgency today to pass the Government's controversial "Hobbit" law but Labour and the Greens say it is a step too far.

Prime Minister John Key announced last night after two days of tense negotiations with studio executives that the long-awaited Hobbit movies would be filmed in New Zealand.

But the Government's negotiating team, which was led by Mr Key and included senior Government ministers Gerry Brownlee, Steven Joyce and Chris Finlayson, was forced to make concessions to keep the movies here including an extra $35 million and a change to labour laws clarifying the status of film workers as contractors.

There will also be $10 million from the Government to market the film after the negotiators agreed to New Zealand tourism material piggybacking on the DVDs and other material. All up, the cost to taxpayers will top $100 million for the two movies to be made here.

But Mr Key said the movies were the biggest-ever made and New Zealand could not afford to lose the shoot.

If the Hobbit had gone offshore, the local movie industry would have been in peril.

"[This] keeps us on the world stage as a great place to make movies," he told National Radio this morning.

Overseas media have described The Hobbit as possibly the biggest movie franchise ever and Mr Key said the amount being spent on the films was "off the scale" even for Hollywood.

Ad Feedback

But the Government is being accused of selling out to a foreign corporate and Labour and the Greens say they will oppose today's law change.

Labour MP Trevor Mallard said it was good The Hobbit would be made here. 

"But it's at a hefty price that will cost all New Zealanders, especially those whose employment depends on contracts and work in, or close to, the film industry."

Mr Key said last night the Government had the numbers to get the legislation passed, with support from ACT and United Future. There would be discussions with other parties today.

But Green Party co-leader Russel Norman said New Zealand was prostituting its industrial laws to satisfy a multinational corporation.

Mr Key disagreed.

"There was no going forward without this."

Executives from New Line Cinema and Warner Brothers flew into New Zealand earlier this week to discuss pulling the project to another location offshore, with other countries offering lucrative inducements for them to abandon New Zealand in their favour.

The deal struck rocky ground after New Zealand actors, under the banner of their Australian body the Media, Entertainment & Artists' Alliance, issued a worldwide call for actors to boycott the movie because they had been refused the right to bargain collectively.

The notice was withdrawn after a public backlash and the union promised there would be no further disruption. But Mr Key said the studios placed no stock in that assurance.

CTU boss Helen Kelly today accused the Government of "opportunistically" using the Hobbit fracas to slip through labour law changes in the face of demands from an overseas corporate.

It would allow film companies to deprive workers on basic rights including sick leave and holiday pay.

"They will be denied employment rights and not be able to challenge that."

Mark Hadlow and Peter Hambleton, cast as dwarves in The Hobbit, were "delighted" to hear the movie would be shot in New Zealand.

Hadlow said the movie would provide jobs for thousands of people, no matter what those opposed to the deal said.

"The most important thing to come out of it is that these two films are now going to be shot in New Zealand. That will have a positive impact," he told Radio New Zealand.

Hambleton said it it was a "massive" thing for the country.

"It's great for New Zealand, let's look forward to making great movies and get on with it. But let's also have some analysis of what's happened so various professions can move forward."

Sir Peter Jackson is yet to comment on the deal struck between the Government and Warner Bros.

His spokesman said today there would be "nothing from Peter this morning".

"We've got two films to make and we're five weeks behind on pre-production thanks to recent events," he said.

A statement may come later in the day, he said.

Screen Production and Development Association chief executive Penelope Borland said it would start negotiating with Actors' Equity on minimum terms and conditions for actors.

Weta co-founder Sir Richard Taylor said the news The Hobbit would be filmed here marked a "wonderful day for the New Zealand film industry ... To the Hon John Key, Warners, Peter [Jackson], Fran [Walsh] and Philippa [Boyens] - thank you!"

Interactive timeline: The battle over The Hobbit

- with TOM HUNT AND JOHN HARTEVELT and KIRSTY JOHNSTON

393 comments
Post a comment
Andy   #393   08:27 pm Oct 31 2010

Govt. offers bribe to US company in same week NZ named 'least' corrupt country in world? ? ?

Den Dennis   #392   05:42 pm Oct 30 2010

Just some non-original movie for Jackson, he's obviously forgotten how to come up with something original. Thanks for spending some of my money on yet another worthless cause.

Sean   #391   10:34 pm Oct 29 2010

@ Richard A #355 - I'm am embarrassed to call New Zealand my home! $100 million over 4 million people is $25000 which equates to more than the average annual tax bill for every single person in this country!

Where did you learn maths? it is in fact $25 each

Pedant   #390   05:40 pm Oct 29 2010

@Richard A

Unfortunately mate, in order to have a successful well paid career in Australia, you will still need to have basic math skills. There is no downside to this that can't be fixed by voting National out of power next year if it all goes haywire, so stop worrying about it. The unions will recover, the movies are getting made, and contractors will have to go on charging market rates to cover their lack of kiwisaver and holiday pay.

Expanation for the real people   #389   04:54 pm Oct 29 2010

The biggest problem I see is that no context is offered around what " rebates" mean. It is obviously interpreted by many as a hand out and i'm sure this is not the case. How about someone using real figures that the average person understands

Tony   #388   03:12 pm Oct 29 2010

Dangerous times ahead!!!!

Someone with a bit of clout has a hissy fit about feeling hard done by, and the Government rushes to change the law to appease.

Watch the flood gates open........

CP   #387   03:06 pm Oct 29 2010

KLK #284 - please google 'sarcasm' and 'if' and investigate the meaning of this symbol '?'

George #328 - this has nothing in common with the America's cup funding at all. The America's cup funding was an actual cost and actual tax dollars were spent on it and to this day I doubt there was any benefit to anyone other than the team. The tax concession to Warner's costs NOTHING, creates thousands of jobs and brings money into the governments pockets.

Jason   #386   12:37 pm Oct 29 2010

There are a lot of incredibly ignorant people here. The 'reporting' of this hasn't done much to help, of course - but the simple fact of the matter is that this "$100m" number (or whatever it is) - it isn't real.

It's not like the government is paying Warner Brothers and New Line $100m to film here. They're simply taking less of the money that Warners & New Line will utlimately spend here as part of the film production. A basic economics lesson would seem to do a lot of you people good. If Warners filmed elsewhere, we wouldn't be 'saving' money; we'd be collecting less tax revenue because a production that was estimated to pump some $750m in to the economy no longer existed.

Ergo, the $100m 'tax break' will probably cost something on the order of -$650m (yes, the negative is there for a reason, folks - it means we make $$ on the tax break) as opposed to a situation where the movie isn't filmed here, and we get a big, fat $0.

All this arguing about "We should pay the $100m to teachers"; there is no $100m to pay them! It doesn't exist - it's not real! It's just money the government has promised not to collect from Warners and New Line as part of production costs, effectively reducing their taxes.

You can argue about fairness of this, but for God's sake, don't argue about the morality of 'giving Warners $100m'. The government's not doing that. They're just promising to TAKE LESS of Warner's money when they start production here.

mello   #385   10:13 am Oct 29 2010

Sal #274

A Public Service Association member by chance, are you?

Allow me to illustrate my point:

A friend's 5 year old brought home his certificate of achievement the other day for "asking questions to the teacher". The certificate was signed by the Principal.

I was appalled, not only at the lack of basic knowledge, but that a) a teacher - a trained professional no less - had perpetrated this, and b) that the principal had not the wit to even notice the unintelligible statement.

When teachers and principals can grasp basic grammar so that indeed they actually do a proper and consistent job of teaching small children to read and write correctly, I will consider that they merit a pay rise. Until then hell will continue to freeze over.

You carefully blur the line between teachers and health workers being "worthless" at one end, and deserving of constant and inordinate salary increases at the other.

Nobody said they were worthless and not many people would argue against 'a fair days pay for a fair days work', but I'm damned if these people should get pay rises continuously just because they demand one and throw tantrums when they don't get their way.

Too hard to measure teachers' performance? Then start with basic grammar.

When children leave school knowing how to write a complete sentence with syntax and correct grammar, have a reading age above 12 (the average reading age public documents are written for in this country), can apply critical thinking and apply basic mathematical skills such as percentages then your precious teachers can have a pay rise.

I rather think, that given the level of illiteracy, spelling errors, lack of grammar and unquestioning diatribes on this thread, one might be drawn to the conclusion that primary and secondary education in this country has failed spectacularly over the past 40 or so years.

Now tell me again why you think teachers deserve yet another 4% pay rise.

Apologies to other readers, as this topic is off-thread.

Azza   #384   08:17 am Oct 29 2010

Legislation for Sale! Legislation for Sale, get it here folks, fresh hot legislation, best in world, buy it here! (cash only please)


Show 334-383 of 393 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content