Auckland board members weigh in on port dispute
JENNY KEOWN
Related Links
Relevant offers
Industries
The council-controlled owners of Ports of Auckland are standing by the company's efforts to outsource work on the waterfront, despite criticism from local board members representing large chunks of the city.
Representatives from 10 of Auckland's 21 local boards have joined forces to oppose Ports of Auckland's plan to sack up to 320 wharfies and replace them with contract workers.
In a joint statement, 28 board members have urged the port to drop its contracting out plans and return to good faith bargaining with the Maritime Union.
Michael Wood, board member for Puketapapa which covers the Auckland suburbs of Three Kings, Lynfield and Hillsborough, issued the statement on behalf of the other representatives.
They felt the dispute was getting out of hand, he said.
A few alarm bells were ringing about what appeared to be a pre-determined strategy to privatise the port, when the mayor had said the port would remain in public hands.
Internal port strategy documents released last week by the union show that port management was considering a contracting out strategy well in advance of negotiations.
However, Simon Allen, chairman of council investment arm Auckland Council Investments, said it supported port chief executive Tony Gibson's moves to contract out workers.
It was misplaced to talk about improvements to the port's operational efficiency alongside discussions on privatisation, he said.
''Our stance all along has been that there is no mandate for privitisation - it's a red herring and should be seen as such.''
The current industrial dispute on the waterfront was part of a long decisionmaking process by the port's board and management, he said.
''The company has a duty to operate in an efficient way and the executive and board are working through the process. We are focused on the strategic plan and outputs required to bring this organisation in to a performance area for stakeholders.''
Port management had overwhelming support for their plans from their customers, Allen said.
Wood said the wharfies' dispute might be part of a commercial process but the port was owned by a democratically elected council. Port directors were completely accountable to the mayor and council, and that needed to be respected, he said.
The boards represented on the joint statement are:
Albert-Eden
Maungakiekie-Tamaki
Waitemata
Mangere-Otahuhu
Otara-Papatoetoe
Puketapapa
Whau
Kaipataki
Waitakere Ranges
Waiheke
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Port strike to last three weeks
Market midday: NZ shares rise higher at noon
Skellerup posts record half-year profit
Fairfax profit falls 41 per cent
New hope for kiwifruit growers
Port's shares rise on news of record profit
APN posts A$45m interim net loss
Treaty obligations to stay in SOE sales law
Profit leap for Vital Healthcare
Carterton tragedy: Safety chief would refuse balloon ride
Major courts overhaul proposed
Foreign Affairs Ministry confirms 305 jobs to go
Mob cancels star's performance
Kiwis not up with online security
Helena Bonham Carter 'honoured'
New hope for kiwifruit growers
Gender non-conformity linked to abuse
Nelsen cleared to lead NZ against Jamaica
Robinson starts for Chiefs against old team
Man's childhood comic collection fetches $4.2m
Carterton tragedy: Safety chief would refuse balloon ride
Heavy rains, wind pound country
Henry climbs into Aussie crisis
Daily trivia quiz: February 23
Reviewer: Henry star of new show
Runners strip off for Christchurch
Why I feel for the kids of ego-trippers
2 Broke Girls: the worst new show of 2012
The age of the Angry Young Man
Is the other woman always to blame?
Reviewer: Henry star of new show
Sea Shepherd ship to set sail from Wellington