Facilitation helping port dispute - CEO

ANDREA FOX
Last updated 11:23 11/07/2012

Relevant offers

Industries

Reserve Bank tools - winners and losers Sanford posts increased profit Mayor rejects sale of assets Avoid a monetary bloc, says economist Auditor-General won't investigate Solid Energy Snakk capital raising beats target Dorchester hit by low-ball offer April exports drop Investors challenge GPG on pay Coalmining could begin by end of year

Facilitation to settle the Ports of Auckland drawn-out labour dispute over a new collective agreement is "making good progress" after 11 meetings between the company and the Maritime Union and with two more booked, says company chief executive Tony Gibson.

Speaking to the Waikato Institute of Directors today in Hamilton, Gibson said he had spent 166 hours in negotiations, meetings and facilitation, not counting preparation and follow up work, since the industrial dispute between the Auckland City Council-owned company and the Maritime Union started late last year.

Gibson said the structure of Auckland governance, the new single super council, had been "very helpful" in dealing with the long drawn out dispute.

"The governance situation is working very well. We continue to get good support - they want change, we want change."

Asked about interaction and support from the port's board, Gibson said during the "crisis", the board and management had become integrated.

"It's a very nerve wracking time for the board. There's reputational damage and other issues but we have become one. You couldn't tell the difference."

During the height of the union strike action which disrupted shipping operations, the company had been in almost daily contact with all its stakeholders, from the Government and local government to trucking and logistics companies, he said.

Asked if there was anything he would do differently, Gibson said he was "probably naïve".

"I thought there could be a cultural change. There is a culture predicated around social responsibility and another around customer needs. Neither way is right or wrong."

The company's new five year strategic plan came after more than 30 workshops with staff, he said.

The port had lost $25 million in business to the Port of Tauranga in the past six months, he said.

The port company wants a new collective agreement with waterfront staff to lift falling productivity, compete more effectively with the Port of Tauranga, ease the capital investment burden on Auckland ratepayers and increase dividends to the council.

The ports are the gateway for 36 per cent of New Zealand import and export trade, but Gibson said revenues were flat and earnings before interest and tax (ebit) were below that of Tauranga.

It had facilitated trade to the value of $12.2 billion and delivered dividends totally $500 million to Auckland city.

The Port of Tauranga was making more profit than the Ports of Auckland, although it was a smaller port in terms of containers handled, and for a container port the bottom line was scale, Gibson said.

Ad Feedback

Without productivity improvements, Auckland ports capacity in relation to land area would be exhausted by 2013-2014, he said.

Over the past decade the port had lost ground to Tauranga, although it had the best port location and the most modern equipment, he said.

"We have poor labour productivity. We are not allowed 12 hour shifts, 8.5 hours is the maximum allowed. We are not allowed to allocate the best performing staff to specialised skill areas. We have fixed shift start times, we don't service a ship when it arrives..."

- © Fairfax NZ News

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content