Hart fights on in ANZ property row

WILLIAM MACE
Last updated 12:16 15/10/2012
Barry Hart
PHIL DOYLE
LEGAL BATTLE: Barry Hart.

Related Links

Hart's neighbour takes property row to court Barry Hart struck off legal register Court won't budge on Barry Hart's ban Hart's cars go under the hammer

Relevant offers

Industries

Inland Revenue close to revealing job cuts as BT programme proceeds apace BNZ seeks mortgagee sale of Abel Tasman beach owner's $1.6m Wellington home Waitangi weekend drew out the shoppers Reclusive rich-lister John Spencer was once NZ's richest man Gareth Morgan critical of crowd-sourced Abel Tasman beach campaign Mummy blogger Heather Armstrong says 'real voices' being silenced online Animal rights group SAFE calls on Countdown to dump cage-farmed eggs Cloud security broker ThisData helping businesses stay safe in the cloud Ask the Expert: Asking friends for business investment NZ Post announces new vehicle purchase to keep up with changing consumer demands

Disgraced lawyer Barry Hart is continuing a challenge to ANZ bank's sale of what he says is $30 million worth of west Auckland property.

Hart, who was last month struck off the roll of barristers and solicitors after being found guilty of professional misconduct, had to ask Associate Judge David Abbott for permission before he could step in front of the bar in the High Court at Auckland this morning.

Hart is representing himself in opposition to the sale of his eight properties, only one of which has not already been sold at mortgagee sale by ANZ.

Hart is now seeking damages because he alleges the bank did not comply with its duty of care to seek the best possible price for the properties.

ANZ says it has complied with all its obligations. It says it was entitled to rely on the professional marketing advice and sales processes of real estate agency Bayleys.

Counsel for the bank said a valuation by Colliers which was relied on by Hart was inaccurate, because it did not reflect a High Court decision blocking a district plan change which would have allowed subdivision of the rural properties.

Ad Feedback

- BusinessDay.co.nz

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content