NZ firms 'complacent' about bribery overseas

HAMISH RUTHERFORD
Last updated 05:00 30/10/2012

Relevant offers

Industries

Wellington airport consumers $33m better off says Commerce Commission Cricket World Cup boosts New Zealand's economy by $110 million New Zealand not immune to Greek crisis fallout: John Key Wayne Percival new UDC finance chief executive Real estate agent discharged over stinky delivery Vilagrad Winery family looks forward after fire Wellington business Mojo Coffee to open in Xi'an, China Smelter site rehab 'encouraged' in district plan The Warehouse compares prices with Farmers in toy catalogue Waiariki ordered to pay $40,000 after tutor crushed by tree

Research into New Zealand companies' experience with corruption overseas found many are complacent about the risks and confused about what exactly constitutes bribery.

Last night Transparency International issued a report, conducted in conjunction with UMR Research, which interviewed several exporting businesses about their experience with corruption overseas.

It found many took a laissez-faire approach, especially when it involved small amounts of money.

In other cases there was confusion about what was acceptable, such as gifts or facilitation payments on the one hand, and outright bribes on the other.

Transparency International director Claire Johnstone said exporters needed to ensure they did not expose themselves to accusations of corruption, which could damage New Zealand's reputation or lead to prosecution.

"The old adage of 'doing what the cultural practice is' is not a justification to act unethically. All companies should train their staff on what corruption is and have very strong polices and guidelines on how to manage the issue when exporting."

Ad Feedback

- BusinessDay.co.nz

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content