Kiwis fight German threats to manuka honey industry

ROB STOCK
Last updated 05:00 11/11/2012

Relevant offers

Industries

Sephora NZ customers left in dark with undelivered orders and no customer service Workshop gives girls a taste of engineering career Auckland house prices stop rising in November, Barfoot & Thompson says Commerce Commission to take three firms to court over steel mesh Sky and Vodafone agree to delay merger decision Hellaby final takeover price up to $3.60 What NZ firms can learn from Deloitte Fast 50 companies Records fall as New Zealand's new vehicle sales accelerate Springload hosting first NZ Django Girls coding workshop NZ water parks after Dreamworld tragedy: Splash Planet busy, Waiwera plans upgrade

Manuka honey producers are waging war on two fronts against Germans challenging their industry.

The UMF Honey Association has engaged law firm Buddle Finlay to fight one German who has registered the word "Manuka" as a trademark covering all of Europe.

At the same time, the association is battling another German seeking to patent a bee food which its inventor says will give the honey produced by the bees the exact chemical profile of manuka honey.

John Rawcliffe, general manager of the association, said both developments posed a threat to the manuka honey industry.

Manuka honey is extremely valuable and the industry could be worth $1 billion a year if it is able to maintain its credibility. Rawcliffe says the high value of manuka honey makes it a target internationally.

Already there is international counterfeiting, while locally a bitter fight has been waged over manuka honey labelling and standards.

The Commerce Commission has been gathering evidence on the designation systems to see whether any are misleading consumers. Retailers in Auckland were put on notice by the association last week that they can't simply rely on producers' labels as a defence against actions under the Fair Trading Act should the manuka honey they are selling not turn out to be the real deal.

The European trademark was being contested on the grounds that manuka is a generic, descriptive term, said Buddle Findlay lawyer John Glengarry, and he had high confidence of victory for the association.

Glengarry said if the trademark was allowed, the person who registered it "would have as a starting point the right to prevent others from using the word manuka as a trademark for honey".

This would include products to which manuka honey is added.

The Deutsches Patent und Markenamt database lists the "proprietor" as Mirko Zill. Rawcliffe said he could not be allowed to own a trademark to make money out of manuka honey producers of New Zealand.

The patent for the bee food, which has been submitted to the New Zealand Intellectual Property Office, was being opposed on the grounds that it was not inventive, said Glengarry.

Rawcliffe admitted that although he did not believe the technology was being used to fake manuka honey yet, or boost "inactive" manuka honey, its existence meant the threat would forever be there.

As well as the legal fees to fight the patent registration, which is in the name of German Daria Heuer, Rawcliffe said the association had spent around a quarter of a million dollars on having lab tests devised that could distinguish real manuka honey from honey produced using the bee feed.

Ad Feedback

They looked likely to be ready in two months' time, he said.

All up, the legal bill for the association would come to over half a million dollars.

Rawcliffe warned that honey was a food produced by bees using nectar from flowers, and that anyone caught selling honey that was made with additives without disclosing it would be breaking the law.

He said the association had turned down an offer to purchase the technology.

That the association was fighting its legal battles alone, with no help from the Government or from a number of manuka honey producers, was disappointing, Rawcliffe said, but "manuka is worth huge money".

- Sunday Star Times

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content