Gale avoids broadband pricing row

TOM PULLAR-STRECKER
Last updated 05:00 11/12/2012

Relevant offers

Industries

Air New Zealand sets new benchmark for wine industry Wellington's Felix Cafe property put on the market TVNZ heads to Rio but criticises Sky TV demands Petone building offers CBD perks without the cost or chaos Miner found dead after front-end loader rolls in Waihi goldmine Annual building consents rise to a 12-year high Ministry issues fresh warning over phone scams Macpac happy with new Australian owners Champ Ventures Chinese get 70 per cent of NZ entrepreneur work visas Wellington bar owners 'terrified' of police and a one-way door policy for party zone

Telecommunications Commissioner Stephen Gale has declined to be drawn into a row between his predecessor, Ross Patterson, and the Government over broadband policy.

Patterson yesterday accused the Government of "unprecedented" interference for threatening to legislate over a draft determination by Gale on the price internet providers should have to pay to supply broadband over Chorus' copper network.

He said if the Government was considering "artificially increasing" the cost of copper-based broadband in a bid to increase uptake of the Crown-backed ultrafast broadband network, that policy was "doomed to failure".

A commission spokeswoman said as it was now working through the price determination process and taking submissions, it had no comment. Communications Minister Amy Adams could not be reached for comment.

The price of broadband could fall by about $12 a month in two years' time if internet providers pass on cuts to Chorus' charges that were proposed a week ago in a draft ruling by the Commerce Commission.

But Prime Minister John Key immediately signalled that the Government was concerned about the effect cheaper copper-based broadband could have on the fibre-optic UFB network, in which the Government has agreed to invest $1.3 billion.

He has not ruled out using legislation to overturn the proposed price cut.

Patterson suggested that amounted to "undue political interference".

Ad Feedback

- BusinessDay.co.nz

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content