Bridgecorp's Urwin struck off accountant register

MATT NIPPERT
Last updated 10:16 21/01/2013
GARY URWIN: Changed his plea on 10 charges of making untrue statements in investment documents to guilty.
JOHN SELKIRK/Fairfax
GARY URWIN: Changed his plea on 10 charges of making untrue statements in investment documents to guilty.

Relevant offers

Industries

Demand for builders heats up Heart of the City paid $800,000 in contractor fees Orion Health share fall on lower cash flows Tourism Radio NZ seeks to crowdfund $350K Resort plans for two Auckland islands Prime News redundancies confirmed Picton firm N-Viro supplies parts for floating superstructure Wynyard Group confirms it undershot revenue target Chinese tourists flock to NZ Migration boom tops 50,000 for first time

A Bridgecorp director jailed for making untrue statements has also been struck off the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants.

In April Gary Urwin was sentenced to two years in prison after pleading guilty to 10 Securities Act charges relating to the collapse of failed finance company Bridgecorp.

In a decision publicised today, the ICA said Urwin's conviction had brought the profession into disrepute and further action was warranted.

"In order to protect the public interest and maintain professional standards it is necessary to remove the member's name from the Institute's register of members," the decision said.

Urwin was ordered to pay the ICA costs of $7,000.

The collapse of Bridgecorp cost 14,500 investors $490 million and all five directors have been convicted of lying in company prospectuses.

In his role as a non-executive director Urwin was largely responsible for Bridgecorp's disastrous property investments in Australia and Fiji that the High Court heard were hidden in another company, Barcroft Holdings.

Urwin was a 25 per cent shareholder in Bridgecorp and also held a 50 per cent shareholding in a Fiji-based company that Bridgecorp was lending to.

Urwin's role on both sides a of a $76m loan from Bridgecorp to Barcroft - which was designed to fund a hotel development at Momi Bay in Fiji - meant the transaction was between related parties.

Investors were not told the truth behind the Barcroft transaction - that many of the loans were overdue and made to related parties.

Ad Feedback

- BusinessDay.co.nz

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content