Employers group wary of strike-breaking Bill

HAMISH RUTHERFORD
Last updated 14:55 14/06/2013
Kim Campbell
JOHN SELKIRK/ Fairfax NZ
EMA BOSS: Kim Campbell

Relevant offers

Industries

TVNZ acknowledges Netflix's influence on market with online revamp Reading cinema gets $27.5 million for earthquake damage to Courtenay Central Chart of the day: Peaks and troughs in bonds for Dunedin rentals Home building costs climb 3.5pc, but they should start to ease Environment Minister Nick Smith announces $19m plan to deal with 'blot' of tyre mountains Holiday-makers and migrants still finding NZ attractive Fairfax NZ photo library set to return home after US wrangle Reserve Bank keeps official cash rate on hold Risk averse? That's no way to describe New Zealanders, Sir Ray Avery says Former Commerce Commission boss to lead ATEED

A leading business lobby warns a strike-breaking bill to come before Parliament will prove ''divisive'' and could be a bridge too far.

On Thursday Jami-Lee Ross' Employment Relations (Continuity of Labour) Amendment Bill was drawn from the members' bill ballot.

The bill would overturn section 97 of the Employment Relations Act 2000, which prevents the use of volunteers, contractors or other casual employees during strikes and lockouts.

Unions immediately attacked the bill as undermining workers' rights, and now they are getting support from a employers' group.

Kim Campbell, chief executive of the Employers & Manufacturers Association, said the bill appeared to be a good idea ''at first flush'', but this did not take into account unintended consequences.

"While its principles are worth exploring it could prove very divisive,'' Campbell said.

"New Zealand communities place a high value on fairness and the Bill could have consequences that would be considered unfair.

"In spite of several high profile cases we have had 10 to 15 years of harmonious workplace relations and don't want to jeopardise that. We need to look carefully at the implications of industrial action on essential industries such as the ports and hospitals, as well as on small businesses.''

Campbell added that employers did not want employment law to change every time there was a change of Government ''and we can foresee law based on this Bill may not last".

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content