Land sale delays blamed on buyers

MICHAEL BERRY
Last updated 08:49 24/06/2013

Relevant offers

Industries

Japan a land of opportunities for NZ firms We won't own cars any more - we'll share them, forecasts Toyota NZ boss Pound falls to 30-year low against US dollar amid anti-global sentiment Maersk shipping line changes NZ route Revamped Smith's City pushes into profitable Auckland International hotel Sofitel Wellington fights $350k development fee - and succeeds Taranaki engineers need to 'get creative' to survive Fiat Chrysler accused of concealing defect in Jeep Grand Cherokee Countdown harnessing the skills of older workers Duncan Garner: Tax the tourist tsunami and give us citizens a break

Delays in processing Overseas Investment Office applications are usually the result of poor information supplied by buyers, the office says.

The foreign land investment regulator was responding to a claim by Bayleys real estate that some prospective overseas buyers of vineyards were being hampered by the time taken to process their offers.

The Overseas Investment Office, a division of Land Information New Zealand, ensures that foreign investors are of good character and will benefit the country by taking control of sensitive land.

Manager Annelies McClure said she had no evidence of vendors going for a quick sale instead of waiting for a foreign buyer with a better offer.

Applications involved time being processed by the office, time waiting for further information from buyers, and consultation with ministers.

The viticultural applications averaged 53.5 working days to process.

They spent 26 days in the Overseas Investment Office. Awaiting information or ministers' approval took up the remainder of the time.

"Other than the time the OIO takes to assess the application, [it] has no control over time frames.

"The primary factor that will influence assessment times is the quality of the application submitted. A poor-quality application will take longer to assess."

The Campaign for Foreign Control of Aotearoa has said the process was little more than a rubber-stamping exercise, given the rare rejections.

McClure admitted most applications were granted, but argued it was because of the transparency of the process weeding out unacceptable buyers early.

In the year to June 20, four out of 38 viticulture applications were processed and approved.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content