Land sale delays blamed on buyers

MICHAEL BERRY
Last updated 08:49 24/06/2013

Relevant offers

Industries

South Canterbury Finance class action sets higher fighting fund target Helping employers turn young workers into dream employees Sky TV to let viewers scroll back to the future Richard Diver abandons $75 million apartment project John Key: Taranaki's economic woes temporary Finance diary for the week starting May 25 Taking coffee to China 60 jobs 'being reviewed' at Light Leathers in Timaru Simon Bridges hoping to attract more electric and driverless cars to NZ Southern Response to get more Government money if needed

Delays in processing Overseas Investment Office applications are usually the result of poor information supplied by buyers, the office says.

The foreign land investment regulator was responding to a claim by Bayleys real estate that some prospective overseas buyers of vineyards were being hampered by the time taken to process their offers.

The Overseas Investment Office, a division of Land Information New Zealand, ensures that foreign investors are of good character and will benefit the country by taking control of sensitive land.

Manager Annelies McClure said she had no evidence of vendors going for a quick sale instead of waiting for a foreign buyer with a better offer.

Applications involved time being processed by the office, time waiting for further information from buyers, and consultation with ministers.

The viticultural applications averaged 53.5 working days to process.

They spent 26 days in the Overseas Investment Office. Awaiting information or ministers' approval took up the remainder of the time.

"Other than the time the OIO takes to assess the application, [it] has no control over time frames.

"The primary factor that will influence assessment times is the quality of the application submitted. A poor-quality application will take longer to assess."

The Campaign for Foreign Control of Aotearoa has said the process was little more than a rubber-stamping exercise, given the rare rejections.

McClure admitted most applications were granted, but argued it was because of the transparency of the process weeding out unacceptable buyers early.

In the year to June 20, four out of 38 viticulture applications were processed and approved.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content