Consents for mine OK - court

MARTA STEEMAN
Last updated 05:00 12/12/2013

Relevant offers

Industries

Hawke's Bay's Elephant Hill winery founder Roger Weiss dies in Germany 10 charges laid over Nurofen by Commerce Commission Milford Asset Management manager was 'under pressure' - FMA Willis St office floor an affordable CBD opportunity Kapiti Coast land and buildings, leased by Countdown Otaki, sells for millions H&M criticised over garment factory workers' conditions Nigel Latta: The NZ paradox - why are we poorer despite doing everything right? Cargo, container increase drives Port Nelson $18 million operating profit NZ renters are shut out of the housing market - Labour 'Bring it on': The Warehouse boss Nick Grayston says to rivals

Coalmining opponents have lost their case for a second time against Solid Energy's Cypress Mine in the West Coast's Happy Valley.

The High Court has dismissed the appeal of the Biodiversity Defence Society against a decision of the Environment Court which held that Solid Energy's consents for the mine had not lapsed.

Solid Energy had a suite of consents to operate the mine. Seven were still current and 15 had to be actioned by August 24 last year. No coal had been mined at that stage, the High Court said.

The society sought a declaration that 15 consents had lapsed under section 125 of the Resource Management Act 1991.

The High Court yesterday dismissed the appeal, adopting the Environment Court's alternative reason, being satisfied that the Resource Management Act consents, considered as a suite of consents, had been actioned.

The consents were an integrated package, the court said.

Works carried out to date by Solid Energy had focused on managing the effects of the mine.

The High Court said coalmining required a suite of consents. Once granted, a lot of planning was needed to integrate the mine into the overall Stockton Plateau coalmining operation.

Significant progress had been made on the planning and large sums had been spent. Also, numerous physical works had been done, such as building of access roads.

The court said there was no material distinction between planning work, such as preparation of management plans, and physical works at the heart of consents.

Therefore, the Environment Court was right in treating the context as a suite of interlinked consents and in finding that effect had been given to the suite of consents for the mine. "The fact that there are two consents out of 22 in respect of which nothing has yet been done, because they are so far downstream in the operation is again not material, on this analysis."

Ad Feedback

- BusinessDay

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content