Moko's killers Tania Shailer and David Haerewa jailed for 17 years ... Read more

Director wants Mainzeal liquidation put on hold

Last updated 05:00 12/03/2014

Relevant offers


Toyota New Zealand moves to electric vehicles - the used car way Gym members fume as doors shut at Hamilton Configure Express NZ cigarette plain packaging law would see Imperial Tobacco sue for compensation Japan a land of opportunities for NZ firms We won't own cars any more - we'll share them, forecasts Toyota NZ boss Pound falls to 30-year low against US dollar amid anti-global sentiment Maersk shipping line changes NZ route Revamped Smith's City pushes into profitable Auckland International hotel Sofitel Wellington fights $350k development fee - and succeeds Taranaki engineers need to 'get creative' to survive

The former parent company of collapsed construction firm Mainzeal has urgently sought a "holding position" on its liquidation, a week after the High Court ruled in the liquidator's favour.

Depending on the outcome, the case could see see the liquidator able to pursue potentially tens of millions of dollars for creditors.

Last week Justice Brendan Brown declined Mainzeal Group's sole remaining director, Richard Yan, a stay of execution on the liquidation of Richina Global Real Estate (RGREL).

Yan was also the sole director of RGREL, which was Mainzeal's parent company until six weeks before the construction company's collapse in February last year.

Mainzeal was placed into receivership by Yan, with more than 2000 creditors lodging claims.

The company was now thought to owe unsecured creditors more than $138 million.

RGREL was later put into liquidation on February 27 this year, with BDO appointed liquidators last week.

But Yan was appealing RGREL's liquidation separately and yesterday sought a "holding position" on its liquidation as part of the wider Mainzeal Group.

This would effectively mean it could not be acted on, pending the outcome of the appeal.

Yesterday Yan appealed the High Court ruling on RGREL, less than a week after it was made.

For now, the liquidation remains on hold after the Court of Appeal reserved its decision.

Yan's lawyer, David Chisholm, QC, was arguing BDO had a conflict of interest in liquidating RGREL at the same time it liquidated the 12 other Mainzeal Group companies.

It would gain access to the parent's records which could benefit other companies BDO was dealing with, he said.

"The interests of creditors and contributors of RGREL are quite different to the interests of the creditors and contributors of Mainzeal."

He sought for the Court of Appeal to put the company in a "holding position" pending the result of its appeal against its liquidation.

On December 31, 2012, Mainzeal Property's shares were transferred from parent company RGREL to another company, Mainzeal Group. But prior to that Mainzeal's accounts showed it was owed about $15m by RGREL.

Another $5.78m had also been awarded as part of the "pooling orders", which RGREL owed to its subsidiary King Façade.

BDO liquidator Andrew Bethell said the inter-company transactions suggested BDO needed "full information and transparency around that company" to understand the wider picture.

BDO's lawyer Zane Kennedy said the interests of the creditors required liquidations to proceed.

The investigation was ongoing into the group's collapse and RGREL's books and records were critical to that process.

Ad Feedback

"The public interest lies clearly in favour of allowing the liquidation with restraint [Justice] Brown put in place", Kennedy said.

- BusinessDay

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content