Signature Homes franchise-holder in receivership

Last updated 09:44 22/11/2011
Wendy Perkins
BROOKE GARDINER/FAIRFAX NZ
FRUSTRATED: Queenstown teacher Wendy Perkins went public with concerns about her home, being built by franchise-holder Cunningham Building and Construction.

Related Links

Signature will finish Queenstown house

Relevant offers

Money

Cold comfort for kitchen company's customers Reject low Zero offer, Scott says Rod Petricevic knew of lack of cash - Crown No alarm about Bridgecorp money woes Bridgecorp boss defiant in dock Petricevic 'did not know of missed payments' Smart ways to climb the property ladder Banks not only ones clipping ticket with sneaky, onerous fees PGC eyeing 20pc of EPIC fund Jail for tax dodging taxi driver

Cunningham Building and Construction, the company that holds the Southland franchise of Signature Homes, has been placed in receivership.

The receivership, which came into effect on Friday last week, was listed on the Companies Office website late yesterday.

Receivers Colin Gower and Stephen Tubbs of BDO Christchurch Limited were appointed on Friday. The first receivers' report is due on January 26.

Yesterday, directors of Signature Homes continued to refuse to speak about the company's position despite out-of-pocket tradesmen, angry suppliers and unhappy Signature Homes customers contacting The Southland Times.

Concerns had been raised about the financial situation of the Southland franchise since Queenstown teacher Wendy Perkins went public with concerns over franchise-holder Cunningham Building and Construction failing to meet deadlines on the construction of her home.

While Signature Homes national director Phillip Howe told her that CBC (2008) Ltd would not be completing her home, CBC director Kelvin O'Connell said meetings he was holding would determine the construction date.

However, neither man will clarify the situation. O'Connell refused to return calls and Howe sent an email yesterday saying: "We are not making any comment to media, however if you wish to email us your questions, we will consider them."

The Southland Times sent a list of questions but had not heard back.

Others connected with the Southland franchise have not shed any further light on the situation either.

CBC has lost two local directors and shareholders since July.

Phillip Mulvey and Cook Adam Trustees Ltd were removed as shareholders of the company on November 3 but  Mulvey declined to say why.

"That's between us and our clients."

However, he did say they had been listed as shareholders only in a trustee capacity.

Mulvey said he had chaired two meetings for the company last week and said while the issues discussed were "no secret" he said it was not his place to discuss information given to creditors.

"I haven't been involved hands-on there for years," he said.

Andrew Ballantyne, listed on a website profiling CBC as the company's quantity surveyor, ceased being a director of the company on July 11. He was reluctant to discuss the reason or anything about the company.

"It was for personal reasons and I am not prepared to comment any further," he said.

Ad Feedback

Wayne Smith, who is listed on the website as being leading foreman for the company, ceased being a director on September 8. He has not returned a call by The Southland Times.

Calls and emails from all over the North and South islands indicate the issues faced by customers and creditors in the south are not restricted to this region, with calls coming from Palmerston North, Hawke's Bay and Wellington.

- © Fairfax NZ News

32 comments
Post a comment
Dave   #32   12:03 pm Dec 02 2011

All sorts of businesses have trouble in times like this. My understanding is that Signature Homes have done a great job over these years of the recession by completing homes in areas where it was needed, thats more than you would get from most businesses or builders.

Scott   #31   03:21 pm Nov 30 2011

This is a little bit hard. We are in the middle of the largest recessions and the home building industry has taken the biggest hit. Signature Homes has stepped up and is going to finish this ladies house. It seems a bit unfair to paint the whole organisation because they have had a couple of their Franchises fall over during this recessionary period. All the major brands have also had franchises fall over and many of the independents have also suffered and closed down.

Howard Rickman   #30   09:03 am Nov 25 2011

The Dunedin franchisee before CBC (Murwil Construction) built my house in Invercargill. There were problems that were never resolved after numerous phone calls to a variety of trades people, the franchise holder, builder and Masterbuild guarantee. The director Murray Wilson and master franchisee director Gavin Hunt were of no help whatsoever, in fact quite the opposite. I fully agree that Masterbuild guarantee is a worthless piece of paper, so don't buy one. You will only be 10's or 100's of thousands of dollars out of pocket and have to fix the problems yourself before getting a CCC. Don't go with Signature is my recommendation.

Dean   #29   04:55 pm Nov 24 2011

There is no accountability held by the franchise owner at all. They decide who can buy the franchise - and most often they will sell to people with no experience at building houses.

They provide the business model, the marketing program (that the franchises fund)and the buying frameworks. The franchise holder takes 3% of every job, plus they arrange all of the material pricing rates through the merchants, and receive a percentage of this also.

The money is in being the head franchise owner but they organise it so that the liability is all held by the franchisee, and they seem to have no qualms about taking on people with little or no experience to run their franchise branches, sell homes to the public who have misguided faith in the brand of the company, and then walk away when it all tips over.

If you are building your best bet is a local builder with a good reputation. They have the lowest overheads and the greatest accountability.

andy   #28   02:21 pm Nov 24 2011

I have just managed to get my house 98% finished with said Signature Homes/Cunningham Builders. I had nothing but poor excuses and am to date left with no code of compliance, unfinished work, and un rectifiable problems left by poor management. The so called Guarentee isn't worth the paper its written on and head office were of no help even though we kept e mailing them with our concerns over Cunninghams. I think some one needs to get everyone together and coordinate action against Signature to try and help people who are worse of than me. I have proof of lies and deciet by Cunninghams. Its not just the home builder but the contractors must be out of pocket as well. There must be strength in numbers

Once bitten...   #27   09:09 am Nov 24 2011

Signature Homes needs to be held accountable for their franchisees operations. They may offer a guarantee of completion to the home owners but this is of no comfort to the trades people. We are a small business that have been on the receiving end of a large financial loss which very nearly put us out of business when the Manawatu Franchise went bust. There was no financial guarantee or compensation for any of the trades who worked on their projects in this region. I have to question if they should be operating at all with the history of the failed franchise operations Signature Homes is clocking up!

Smiley Bert   #26   03:41 pm Nov 23 2011

Well, I pity the poor people caught in this situation once again and I would bet that they were or are "Master Builder's" The Master builder gaurantee is not worth the paper it is written on . They are all Rat Bags these fly by night builders, the first thing the directors do is go out and buy a fancy double cab or fancy car with their clients money .We had our new home build buy a Major Building Franchise and they are master builders and I can tell you from experience it was the most stressful months of our lives , 14 months to build a one level 320 m3 home !!! after 4 years we still have issues that will never be resolved .

Bazz   #25   03:09 pm Nov 23 2011

i before e except after c. Do you have a spell checker Mr. [or Mrs] Journalist?

Mere   #24   03:05 pm Nov 23 2011

I dont know of many business that deliberately go out to become insolvent. I do know that when South Canterbury Finance was going bust this Government stepped in and paid out the investors, most of whom have more money that you or I will see in a lifetime, but not only did they pay out in full they also paid the interest of 14%. Who says there is a level playing field? The building industry is almost always the first to bear the brunt of any recession. If the Government had taken the same apporoach to them or home owners as they did to SCF may be building firms up and down the country would not be insolvent today and potential home owners would be in their new homes.

radar83   #23   03:03 pm Nov 23 2011

The sad fact is the builder has not go into liquidation personally. It would have been a limited liabilty company. He is not liable to pay damages, and will be back running another limited liability company in a matter of weeks. They have taken this ladies money and ran very well knowing the company would be placed into liquidation. Yet the law is there to protect the company owner as opposed to the customers left with nothing! sad but that is the reality


Show 1-22 of 32 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content