Bid for assets rejected

MARTA STEEMAN
Last updated 05:00 02/06/2012

Relevant offers

Money

FMA tells market participants to focus on good conduct Economist predicts Brexit-like shift in attitudes towards housing Submissions close on proposed electricity pricing system changes Recap: David Jones store opening Parents with children at private schools investigated by IRD for unlawful tax rebates Hamish McIntosh fights to keep Ross Asset Management profits Ethical shopping - more consumers are driving change The Japanese 'rent men' who are paid just to listen One of the world's largest boombox collections goes to auction in Dunedin The surprising drop in credit card debt, and the reasons behind it

Two companies owned by property developer David Henderson have lost an application to the High Court over competing claims to the assets of another company associated with him.

The plaintiffs, Gibbston Downs Wines and RFD finance No2, owned by Henderson, had sought a declaration that their security interest over the collateral of Anthem Holdings, which was in receivership, had priority over Perpetual Trust's claim.

Justice Chisholm ruled that given the plaintiffs' security interest did not have priority over Perpetual's, the declarations sought could not be made. The application was dismissed.

Perpetual was entitled to costs against the plaintiff together with disbursements, he ruled.

The background to the case was that Christchurch finance company Propertyfinance Securities (PFS) provided finance to Anthem under a general security agreement in 2005. The securities register for Anthem recorded PFS as the first registered security holder.

The following year Capital+Merchant Finance provided finance to Anthem, on the basis that it held a first ranking security interest.

Ultimately PFS agreed to concede priority to Capital+Merchant. It took seven months for the issue to be resolved and the judgment said the evidence did not disclose what, if anything, was going on behind the scenes in that time. However, that was not significant and it was the agreement that counted.

Capital +Merchant assigned its first ranking security interest to Perpetual in November 2006.

The plaintiffs had contended that the subordination arrangement expired on March 31, 2010 but the judge did not agree.

Ad Feedback

- BusinessDay.co.nz

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content