Ross assets may be sold for receiver costs

Last updated 12:12 26/11/2012

Related Links

IRD to cut Ross investors' losses? Ross held in hospital for three weeks SFO confirms Ross investigation

Relevant offers


More renewable power on tap in first six months of 2017 Has Kiwisaver saved us? NZ's saving habits before and after Loan companies banned over unreasonable fees NZ cities prepare for the dollars and excitement of another Lions Tour To tip or not to tip, that isn't the question How an 'average guy' can save for a comfortable retirement To tip or not to tip? An American in New Zealand weighs in Five fictional families show how different Kiwis save, and how they can save better To start saving, you first need to know everything about what you're spending We've been playing Monopoly wrong - it's a protest against the rich

Receivers for Ross Asset Management are indicating they will begin selling the suspected Ponzi scheme’s assets to cover costs, because its founder does not appear to have the means himself.

Representing PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) in the High Court in Wellington this morning, Bell Gully partner Jenny Stevens, presented a memorandum showing the costs of the receivership up until November 12 were $153,647.49.

To cover the costs, Stevens said receivers would have to sell some assets held by Ross Asset Management. An earlier order stated that the costs of the receivership should be covered by David Ross, its founder and sole director, however this would not be possible, Stevens said.

‘‘The position is that Mr Ross’ personal assets identified to date are insufficient to meet those costs. While that’s an ongoing matter for investigation, there’s certainly not sufficient liquid assets that are clearly attributable to him. There’s questions of joint property and the like, that’s why we are seeking the order we are.’’

Stevens said the costs were reasonable, as evidenced by the ‘‘extremely comprehensive’’ first receivers’ report dated November 12.

‘‘The amount of work that sits behind that [level of costs] should be evident on the face of the document.’’

Justice Stephen Kos said the right of receivers to sell property was already established and he did not need to grant permission. He said he saw nothing unreasonable in the table of costs associated with the receivership presented by Stevens.

Ross Asset Management, based on The Terrace in central Wellington, had its offices raided by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) on October 31.

The regulator sprung into action after a number of investors complained that they had been unable to withdraw money. Within a week of the raid an asset protection order had been obtained by the High Court and the company was placed into receivership.

The first receivers’ report revealed that of the $450 million investors believed was being managed on their behalf, little over $10m had been established.Since then John Fisk of PwC said the total had increased to about $11m, but that a meeting with Ross meant there was little hope that substantially more would be found.

Ross was released from hospital last week, having been held under the Mental Health Act for three weeks.

Ad Feedback

He has stated publicly that he will cooperate with FMA and Serious Fraud Office investigations, but has declined to comment about the company.
PWC and the FMA have both said Ross had the ‘‘characteristics of a Ponzi scheme’’.


Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content