Ross wants to raise cash to pay legal bills

HAMISH RUTHERFORD
Last updated 07:50 27/11/2012

Related Links

Ross receivers may start selling assets David Ross released from mental health care IRD to cut Ross investors' losses? Recovery of more Ross money unlikely

Relevant offers

Money

A thousand people a year challenge mistakes in credit files Savers have options if they want a better return than banks can give them Health confessions from people in our most populous centres 'Health age' research spells out grim outlook for many Inquiry which found Newshub leaked interest rate decision cost taxpayers $59,000 Predicting your KiwiSaver account balance easier with new Kiwi Wealth tool Budget 2016: It's not so tough at the top while the bottom 'gets ignored' Auckland family of 10 appeals $78,000 Work and Income debt Seven ways to answer difficult job interview questions about money New Zealand's $750 billion man in London calls for compulsory saving

The founder of failed investment firm Ross Asset Management and his wife are seeking permission to sell chattels to help cover his legal bills and recoup household costs.

Lawyers for David Ross, sole director of the company feared to have run what could turn out to be New Zealand's largest Ponzi scheme, were in the High Court at Wellington yesterday for the latest hearing on freezing orders over his assets and companies.

Ross was not in court, but a memorandum from his lawyer, Gary Turkington, revealed that solicitors were in talks with the receiver, PricewaterhouseCoopers, about selling chattels he owns with wife Jillian to help cover his legal bills.

It added that Mrs Ross had incurred household debts that had to be paid from her personal bank account, which "should be reimbursed from their joint account".

The asset freezing order obtained by the Financial Markets Authority gives the couple $1000 a week to live on as well as releasing funds for "reasonable" legal bills.

Both sides have accepted that there is a shortage of cash or easily saleable assets owned solely by Ross, with the $153,000 incurred by the receivers so far having to be covered by selling assets owned by Ross Asset Management.

Turkington said whatever of Ross' assets were sold to cover costs, it would be a matter of public record, open to anyone seeking to recover money from him.

"For the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever I have recommended, and David has completely accepted, that this process should be totally open."

Turkington likened the situation to that of Kim Dotcom and Mark Hotchin, both of whom had been subject to court-approved asset freezing orders.

Ross Asset Management was placed in receivership early this month, with the first receivers' report showing that of the $450 million investors believed was being managed on their behalf, little over $10m had been established as existing.

Receiver John Fisk said the figure had risen to $11.48m by yesterday.

Ad Feedback

- BusinessDay.co.nz

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content