Hanover trial 'too hard' for jury

RICHARD MEADOWS
Last updated 05:00 26/03/2013

Relevant offers

Money

Outrageous costs and mis-sold loan insurance to be weeded out by new code Kids will still be bombarded by junk food adverts under new rules Financial benefits of escaping the rat run and working from home New Zealanders in Australia say Kiwis pay too much for food The cash machine has been around for 50 years Complaint upheld against Lotto Mother's Day ad Sheldon Slabbert: Brexit, one year on Food giants resist Aussie call to ban cartoon characters from junk-food ads Paymark and iTicket partner to offer online eftpos payment First-home buyers' guide to getting a mortgage

A Queen's Counsel representing former Shareholders' Association chairman Bruce Sheppard in a defamation suit has suggested inconsistency in Hanover Finance's owners claim that their own investment documents issued to the public are too complex for a jury to understand.

Businessmen Eric Watson and Mark Hotchin are pursuing Sheppard for several million dollars of damages over comments he made in 2009, alleging they were "crooks" and had acted improperly in relation to the debt restructuring of Hanover Finance.

In the High Court at Auckland yesterday, Watson and Hotchin's own legal heavyweight, Julian Miles, QC, argued that the case was too complicated for a jury and should be heard before a judge alone.

But Sheppard's lawyer, Bruce Gray, QC, said the documents involved were designed to be digested by the public, including the prospectuses for the original debt securities.

"Documents were prepared for presentation to the public, issued to the public and relied on by the public for making decisions," he said.

"But now it is said by the issuer those documents are too complicated for the public to understand, and the public can't be trusted with the task of evaluating them . . . we submit there's an inconsistency."

However, Justice Mark Cooper questioned whether such documents assumed at least some degree of sophistication among those reading them.

Miles said the case would involve putting several segments of the failed finance company's history under the microscope.

Gray reiterated that Sheppard was not in court to seek a jury trial.

"But as a matter of principle, Mr Sheppard, as a commentator on matters of investment to the public, says that this . . . should be left to a jury."

The hearing is expected to be concluded today.

Ad Feedback

- BusinessDay.co.nz

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content