All currency is just an illusion

Last updated 15:59 26/02/2014

Relevant offers

Opinion & Analysis

Peter Townsend: The important interdependency of business and the community How to get value for money from your health insurance If you are taking financial risks, you should have a safety net ready Time to speak up or Wellington's traffic bottlenecks will get much worse Pattrick Smellie: How to tell when Aussies are beaten Mark Weldon - a casualty of the brutal rationalisation in the media sector Bus investment aims to futureproof fleet Career advice to a daughter: Don't do as I do Siah Hwee Ang: China grapples with massive urbanisation Susan Hornsby-Geluk: Donald Trump's staff legal support can come with surprise costs

When I first stated travelling for work, I was surprised and amused by the various currencies I saw. Pre-euro, one would encounter a multitude of paper bills of different sizes and colours, each imprinted with a famous man or woman I probably hadn't heard of.

OPINION: Imagine that: The locals actually believed these silly pieces of coloured paper had value. Sure, paper currency worked as a medium of exchange, and it allowed you to buy goods and services within that society. But how far off was it to observe that this shared belief system was little more than a collective delusion?

Take the paper to another land that didn't share that belief system - they had their own, different delusion - and the paper seemed to be worthless.

That is the simplified version of paper currencies. The real world is obviously more complex. Banks exist, and foreign delusions (currencies if you will) can be exchanged for a fee for the local paper delusion. There is also a nation behind the "worthless" paper, with a standing army, the power to tax and an enormous enforcement mechanism. Perhaps that is the authority that makes our collective delusion seem to be somewhat less deluded.

This brings me to the digital currency, Bitcoin.

Like paper, it too represents a collective delusion. Only instead of paper, it is an open source software, peer-to-peer payment system. It was developed anonymously (by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto) and is limited to 21 million virtual "coins". Its value is determined by the beliefs of its adherents, reflected in trading on the Bitcoin index.

A small but vocal group of crypto-anarchists so strongly disapproves of paper money that the Bitcoins in circulation now are valued at US$6.2 billion ($7.4 billion), up from almost nothing just a few years ago.

Indeed, in the Q&A portion of almost every speech I have given since the financial crisis, invariably a question arises about "worthless" fiat currencies. My response has always been the same: "Please send me your worthless fiat currency, be it euros or dollars, for proper disposal. Contact me at the email below and I will assist in freeing you from this troublesome paper.''

"Worthless" fiat currency works well within the collective delusion to which I belong.

Bitcoin is in the news because of the collapse of Mt Gox, one of the largest Bitcoin trading exchanges, after hackers managed to steal 6 per cent of all the Bitcoin in circulation.

What makes this so intriguing is that all currencies have vulnerabilities. Paper money can be counterfeited, credit-card databases can be breached, bank vaults are far from impregnable. The long list of retailers who have been hacked over the past year shows that every currency or payment system has weaknesses that can be exploited.

Ad Feedback

All of which only serves to bring me back to our original observation: Perhaps with the exception of barter, any system that relies on a medium of exchange is a form of collective delusion. How we interact with it, and what we do in the face of this collective delusion's strengths and weaknesses will determine the way we make future financial plans.

- Washington Post/Bloomberg

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content