Jetstar left high and dry
BY OWEN SCOTT
Relevant offers
Opinion
OPINION: Jetstar had a nightmare debut in the domestic airline market.
It shows how tough it is to launch a new offering into a mature, competitive market.
According to the Stuff website, in Jetstar's first week half of their services departed more than an hour late. Subsequently, they have rejigged their schedule, further disrupting thousands of travel plans of people who took up their cheap flights.
They made the cardinal error of refusing access to some Auckland fans who were trying to get to Wellington for the France-All Blacks test. Being Australian, maybe the Jetstar people don't understand the importance of rugby. To paraphrase the legendary Liverpool soccer coach Bill Shankly, rugby is not a matter of life and death in New Zealand, it is more important than that.
Arch-rival Air New Zealand has been quick to jump in, offering $50 fares to disgruntled Jetstar customers. Those who miss a Jetstar flight by being caught out by their strict 30 minute check-in, or are delayed by more than two hours can take advantage of spare seats on our national airline.
Although I haven't had the opportunity to fly Jetstar, I'm sure most of their offering is very good with well-maintained and comfortable aircraft, skilled and experienced pilots, efficient ground crew and pleasant flight crew. They've also run an effective promotional campaign, getting good exposure for their brand and attracting a lot of initial passengers. Their low-cost pricing strategy is clearly expressed and obviously attractive to people.
But the mistakes made in the delivery of those services, being over-strict about check-ins with customers who aren't accustomed to it, and running services late, has caused a huge and outraged backlash.
That's because airlines are in such a mature, competitive industry. We all know what to expect when catching a flight, and get annoyed when we don't experience it. And when we have choice it becomes a real issue for a company like Jetstar.
Compare that with the early days of commercial airlines. Fares were horrendously expensive and the services were noisy, smelly and dangerous. In 1930 it took about 40 hours and many stopovers to fly from Los Angeles to New York (it now takes under six) on an unreliable propeller plane.
Before the introduction of jet engines, failures were common on commercial flights. According to The Airline Passenger Experience by Daniel Ruse, TWA had up to 10 engine failures a day.
The early airlines were still able to attract a solid niche market. A core of "early adopters" were willing to put up with the expense, danger and inconvenience for the thrill of trying a completely new way of travelling. It didn't matter that it was probably still easier and cheaper to travel by train.
This model is common for any new industry. Think of cellphones. Remember those huge bricks of 20 years ago - they were expensive, heavy, had limited functionality and a narrow range. But there was a bunch of people willing to put up with that because they understood the benefits of mobile communication. The rest of us just stared.
Cellphones have quickly moved into the mainstream. They have moved from a small niche market of early adopters, where it is enough for people to understand "what it is", to a much larger, and more profitable, mainstream market where people need to understand "what it does for me".
Companies, particularly in the technology sector, too often get this wrong. They launch their shiny new technology product into a mature market and wonder why they aren't getting traction simply on the basis of their smart features.
A local example of a company that seems to understand this is software company Xero. In 2006 they launched a new product into a mature market - accounting software for small to medium businesses. Trying to compete on the basis of features wouldn't have been enough - small business accounting systems are very common and well understood. They had to deliver a complete customer experience that was better than that provided by competitors.
Although it is early days for Xero, they have done a good job so far. For example, their product offers a more flexible delivery option over the internet, and they've linked in closely with banks and accounting firms, making it easier and more efficient for the customer to use.
Jetstar responded to its early difficulties. Media reports say the airline is now offering compensation vouchers to inconvenienced travellers, and "extra customer service trainers" are being brought in to improve the experience being offered.
It's a tough lesson for them, and a good example to many others how important it is to get the whole customer experience right. Ninety per cent of what you do can be excellent but that is not enough in a mature market with powerful competitors.
Not to mention denying Kiwis the right to see our beloved All Blacks.
* Owen Scott is from marketing company Concentrate. www.concentrate.co.nz
Post your comment below.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
You write about Jetstar as an opinion piece and your worked is flawed when you say "Although I haven't had the opportunity to fly Jetstar..." Well then, fly the friggin airline first and then make a comment, otherwise shut up - your piece doesn't have any impace when you haven't even been on the airline.
great flight from wellington today on time and friendly staff and all for $29!!!
"Mobes #110 2:40pm
In Jetstar's defense on the 'denied check-in' front, I think it has been blown out of proportion by the media (surprise surprise) and it is the late passengers who are at fault."
I'm not sure how hard this is for you to understand - but I'll make it perfectly clear.
We were NOT late. Jetstar lied. If anything the media were too lenient on them.
This was not blown out of proportion by the media. I'd have timestamped photos proving we were on time if certain Jetstar staff member hadn't pressured me along with the police to delete said proof off my iphone.
Security tapes, which unfortunately are under airport/jetstar control (so it is not in their best interests to release them) will also confirm this - if they ever do get round to releasing them unedited.
We have still yet to recieve an apology from them for this.
Its a pity about all the bad publicity their domestic services have had. People need to remember that weather is not Jetstars fault, especially out of Queenstown. Jetstars Trans Tasman service is great from Christchurch, I have used it many times since its inception. I'm yet to go domestic but I imagine its fine. When the first started in Australia they grumbled for months about all the problems we are hearing here, but now its award winning. Give it time folks and calm down...
In Jetstar's defense on the 'denied check-in' front, I think it has been blown out of proportion by the media (surprise surprise) and it is the late passengers who are at fault. Having worked in the airline industry in the UK about 15 years ago, I am familiar with the disruptive impact of allowing late passengers to delay a flight. Sure, Jetstar may in time be able to improve check-in performance so to permit a later check-in, but if the ticket states that check-in must be completed 30 mins prior to departure, then so be it. A ticket is a binding contract so why should tardy passengers get special exemption? Delaying flight closure can lead to delayed push-back (from stand) and subsequent loss of the take-off slot (window in which ATC will allow a plane to depart) assigned by Air Traffic Control (ATC). A new slot would need to be granted, which may cause considerable delays depending on how many flights are departing and in the air at that time; impacting the plans of other passengers. This can also impact the airline's ability to meet subsequent scheduling and even produce crewing problems. Flight crew are only permitted so many continuous hours on duty, before they cannot work a minute more, by law! If delays put crew outside of permissible hours, then the airline has to find new crew to carry on the rest of the initial shift i.e. bring crew in from home or hotels unexpectedly. I've seen it happen many times and for reasons such as these Passengers who are too lazy, arrogant, ignorant or whatever, to read their ticket, put their rights to travel at risk. Don't damn the airline for it! This country needs airline competition; we all want lower fares for our trips around the country. Embrace Jetstar I say, give them a chance.
I have never used Jetstar, but given the experience of others I am also unlikely to.
re flight that refused access to All Black fans. Passengers to did get aboard say the flight was chocka full,a fact acknowledged by the Captain over the PA. So was the access denied because of the stated reason or because they were overbooked. And no refunds so did Jetstar claim 190 air fares for 180 seats?
What a crock !! Air NZ is a joke !! Offering $50 fares to JetStar passengers who are hard done by, well tough, turn up to your flight on time. Air NZ are mean and rude, they won't offer you a $50 fare if you miss one of _their_ flights, but will do it to JetStar in an attempt to lure their customers. I've had so many poor experiences with Air NZ that I would rather turn up an hour early for a flight on a different airline than have to fly with them
why do fly with Jetstar..take the bus, the train before driving yourself.. grazy! Jetstar should be invastigated by the Commerce Commission and slammed with hefty fines..that'll keeps them on their toes. to Jetstar customers..be aware, if u want cheap u get cheap!
Salary stress increases in New Zealand
Roll on 2050 - New Zealand economy to rise
Local council blowouts hit $200m
Auckland Airport is flying high
Fish expert challenges green lobby
Lawyers heading for security laws stoush
Made in NZ to win Chinese hearts
Quake city assets set to be popular
EU courts Kiwis for science grants
ERA awards restructured employee $21,000
Government blamed for Psa entry
Zespri deputy won't step aside
Prison officers 'turned into mules'
Ethnic rights advice stuns communities
Rugby joy short-lived, nation pessimistic
Dotcom accused van der Kolk 'flabbergasted'
Roll on 2050 - New Zealand economy to rise
England fight back to edge Italy in Six Nations
Suarez a 'disgrace to Liverpool' in loss to United
Police arrest five at Murdoch's Sun newspaper
Oceania, Fifa roles end in disgrace as facts emerge
Cameron-Barrett to headline Heavyweight Explosion
Gardener's paradise planned for Chch
Danny Lee drops back to pack at Pebble Beach
Obama tries to defuse birth control fight
Ethnic rights advice stuns communities
Roll on 2050 - New Zealand economy to rise
Dotcom accused van der Kolk 'flabbergasted'
Prison officers 'turned into mules'
Tension high as lethal log pile cleared
Rugby joy short-lived, nation pessimistic
Police name Hawke's Bay crash victim
Vatuvei magic gives Warriors win over Souths
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
Bus changes raise fears in suburbs
Deep south beats rest of nation in jobless
Farmer faces wait over 'useless' land
Governor General's concert draws thousands
Newest First
Oldest First
I agree with the post below about Air NZ and the Koru - it has really gone downhill in the past year or so and was one of the ways that they positively stood out from the competition.
Now it is not worth the extra $500 a year and I have just told them to keep their renewal and that of my 6 staff!