Jetstar left high and dry

BY OWEN SCOTT
Last updated 08:48 30/06/2009
tn
Supplied
DOING IT TOUGH: Jetstar has had a nightmare debut on the domestic airline market.

Relevant offers

Opinion

The media week that was Call goes out to protect Kiwi assets Kiwis would pay less if big banks had to compete Privacy policy to keep track of Google users To DIY or not? Group work: helpful or just monkey business? What makes a rock star CEO? Wharf dispute a battle with no end How would you like to be sacked? Council CEOs need to earn their salaries

OPINION: Jetstar had a nightmare debut in the domestic airline market.

It shows how tough it is to launch a new offering into a mature, competitive market.

According to the Stuff website, in Jetstar's first week half of their services departed more than an hour late. Subsequently, they have rejigged their schedule, further disrupting thousands of travel plans of people who took up their cheap flights.

They made the cardinal error of refusing access to some Auckland fans who were trying to get to Wellington for the France-All Blacks test. Being Australian, maybe the Jetstar people don't understand the importance of rugby. To paraphrase the legendary Liverpool soccer coach Bill Shankly, rugby is not a matter of life and death in New Zealand, it is more important than that.

Arch-rival Air New Zealand has been quick to jump in, offering $50 fares to disgruntled Jetstar customers. Those who miss a Jetstar flight by being caught out by their strict 30 minute check-in, or are delayed by more than two hours can take advantage of spare seats on our national airline.

Although I haven't had the opportunity to fly Jetstar, I'm sure most of their offering is very good with well-maintained and comfortable aircraft, skilled and experienced pilots, efficient ground crew and pleasant flight crew. They've also run an effective promotional campaign, getting good exposure for their brand and attracting a lot of initial passengers. Their low-cost pricing strategy is clearly expressed and obviously attractive to people.

But the mistakes made in the delivery of those services, being over-strict about check-ins with customers who aren't accustomed to it, and running services late, has caused a huge and outraged backlash.

That's because airlines are in such a mature, competitive industry. We all know what to expect when catching a flight, and get annoyed when we don't experience it. And when we have choice it becomes a real issue for a company like Jetstar.

Compare that with the early days of commercial airlines. Fares were horrendously expensive and the services were noisy, smelly and dangerous. In 1930 it took about 40 hours and many stopovers to fly from Los Angeles to New York (it now takes under six) on an unreliable propeller plane.

Before the introduction of jet engines, failures were common on commercial flights. According to The Airline Passenger Experience by Daniel Ruse, TWA had up to 10 engine failures a day.

Ad Feedback

The early airlines were still able to attract a solid niche market. A core of "early adopters" were willing to put up with the expense, danger and inconvenience for the thrill of trying a completely new way of travelling. It didn't matter that it was probably still easier and cheaper to travel by train.

This model is common for any new industry. Think of cellphones. Remember those huge bricks of 20 years ago - they were expensive, heavy, had limited functionality and a narrow range. But there was a bunch of people willing to put up with that because they understood the benefits of mobile communication. The rest of us just stared.

Cellphones have quickly moved into the mainstream. They have moved from a small niche market of early adopters, where it is enough for people to understand "what it is", to a much larger, and more profitable, mainstream market where people need to understand "what it does for me".

Companies, particularly in the technology sector, too often get this wrong. They launch their shiny new technology product into a mature market and wonder why they aren't getting traction simply on the basis of their smart features.

A local example of a company that seems to understand this is software company Xero. In 2006 they launched a new product into a mature market - accounting software for small to medium businesses. Trying to compete on the basis of features wouldn't have been enough - small business accounting systems are very common and well understood. They had to deliver a complete customer experience that was better than that provided by competitors.

Although it is early days for Xero, they have done a good job so far. For example, their product offers a more flexible delivery option over the internet, and they've linked in closely with banks and accounting firms, making it easier and more efficient for the customer to use.

Jetstar responded to its early difficulties. Media reports say the airline is now offering compensation vouchers to inconvenienced travellers, and "extra customer service trainers" are being brought in to improve the experience being offered.

It's a tough lesson for them, and a good example to many others how important it is to get the whole customer experience right. Ninety per cent of what you do can be excellent but that is not enough in a mature market with powerful competitors.

Not to mention denying Kiwis the right to see our beloved All Blacks.

* Owen Scott is from marketing company Concentrate. www.concentrate.co.nz

Post your comment below.

- © Fairfax NZ News

115 comments
Post a comment
Ed   #115   08:33 am Jul 02 2009

I agree with the post below about Air NZ and the Koru - it has really gone downhill in the past year or so and was one of the ways that they positively stood out from the competition.

Now it is not worth the extra $500 a year and I have just told them to keep their renewal and that of my 6 staff!

Wayne Smithers   #114   07:57 am Jul 02 2009

You write about Jetstar as an opinion piece and your worked is flawed when you say "Although I haven't had the opportunity to fly Jetstar..." Well then, fly the friggin airline first and then make a comment, otherwise shut up - your piece doesn't have any impace when you haven't even been on the airline.

robert s   #113   07:15 pm Jul 01 2009

great flight from wellington today on time and friendly staff and all for $29!!!

MikeE   #112   03:32 pm Jul 01 2009

"Mobes #110 2:40pm

In Jetstar's defense on the 'denied check-in' front, I think it has been blown out of proportion by the media (surprise surprise) and it is the late passengers who are at fault."

I'm not sure how hard this is for you to understand - but I'll make it perfectly clear.

We were NOT late. Jetstar lied. If anything the media were too lenient on them.

This was not blown out of proportion by the media. I'd have timestamped photos proving we were on time if certain Jetstar staff member hadn't pressured me along with the police to delete said proof off my iphone.

Security tapes, which unfortunately are under airport/jetstar control (so it is not in their best interests to release them) will also confirm this - if they ever do get round to releasing them unedited.

We have still yet to recieve an apology from them for this.

Clayton   #111   02:47 pm Jul 01 2009

Its a pity about all the bad publicity their domestic services have had. People need to remember that weather is not Jetstars fault, especially out of Queenstown. Jetstars Trans Tasman service is great from Christchurch, I have used it many times since its inception. I'm yet to go domestic but I imagine its fine. When the first started in Australia they grumbled for months about all the problems we are hearing here, but now its award winning. Give it time folks and calm down...

Mobes   #110   02:40 pm Jul 01 2009

In Jetstar's defense on the 'denied check-in' front, I think it has been blown out of proportion by the media (surprise surprise) and it is the late passengers who are at fault. Having worked in the airline industry in the UK about 15 years ago, I am familiar with the disruptive impact of allowing late passengers to delay a flight. Sure, Jetstar may in time be able to improve check-in performance so to permit a later check-in, but if the ticket states that check-in must be completed 30 mins prior to departure, then so be it. A ticket is a binding contract so why should tardy passengers get special exemption? Delaying flight closure can lead to delayed push-back (from stand) and subsequent loss of the take-off slot (window in which ATC will allow a plane to depart) assigned by Air Traffic Control (ATC). A new slot would need to be granted, which may cause considerable delays depending on how many flights are departing and in the air at that time; impacting the plans of other passengers. This can also impact the airline's ability to meet subsequent scheduling and even produce crewing problems. Flight crew are only permitted so many continuous hours on duty, before they cannot work a minute more, by law! If delays put crew outside of permissible hours, then the airline has to find new crew to carry on the rest of the initial shift i.e. bring crew in from home or hotels unexpectedly. I've seen it happen many times and for reasons such as these Passengers who are too lazy, arrogant, ignorant or whatever, to read their ticket, put their rights to travel at risk. Don't damn the airline for it! This country needs airline competition; we all want lower fares for our trips around the country. Embrace Jetstar I say, give them a chance.

Ruz   #109   01:29 pm Jul 01 2009

I have never used Jetstar, but given the experience of others I am also unlikely to.

ron   #108   11:40 am Jul 01 2009

re flight that refused access to All Black fans. Passengers to did get aboard say the flight was chocka full,a fact acknowledged by the Captain over the PA. So was the access denied because of the stated reason or because they were overbooked. And no refunds so did Jetstar claim 190 air fares for 180 seats?

Smith   #107   09:04 am Jul 01 2009

What a crock !! Air NZ is a joke !! Offering $50 fares to JetStar passengers who are hard done by, well tough, turn up to your flight on time. Air NZ are mean and rude, they won't offer you a $50 fare if you miss one of _their_ flights, but will do it to JetStar in an attempt to lure their customers. I've had so many poor experiences with Air NZ that I would rather turn up an hour early for a flight on a different airline than have to fly with them

Waltraud   #106   08:59 am Jul 01 2009

why do fly with Jetstar..take the bus, the train before driving yourself.. grazy! Jetstar should be invastigated by the Commerce Commission and slammed with hefty fines..that'll keeps them on their toes. to Jetstar customers..be aware, if u want cheap u get cheap!


Show 56-105 of 115 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content