NYT editor fired for incompetence, 'not gender'

Last updated 11:26 18/05/2014
NYT
Reuters

HAPPIER DAYS: Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr holds up four fingers to indicate the four Pulitzer Prizes won by the New York Times in 2013. At right is Jill Abramson, who "lost the support" of the newsroom.

Baquet
Reuters
NEW ROLE: Managing editor Dean Baquet is the paper's first African-American editor.
Jill Abramson
Reuters
GONE: Jill Abramson's behaviour included "arbitrary decision-making, a failure to consult and bring colleagues with her, inadequate communication and the public mistreatment of colleagues".

Relevant offers

World

Love and loss - romance scam victim fleeced of over $260,000 What's behind the global stock market selloff? Pukeko Pictures Thunderbirds Are Go! TV series to launch in US with Amazon Dick Smith Australia bleeds over $3 million a week as deal looms FMA in Court of Appeal with financial services company headed by Luigi Wewege US chain Red Lobster enjoys sales surge after mention in Beyonce song Walt Disney posts record quarterly profit on success of Star Wars Banks eye more cost cuts amid global growth concerns Shkreli is sued over sharing images of his $2m Wu-Tang Clan album Shares extend losses on fears over global growth, banks

New York Times Co publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr denies the ouster of top editor Jill Abramson was due to gender bias and listed ways in which she was a bad manager.

Sulzberger issued a statement on Saturday (local time) that identified a pattern of behaviour including "arbitrary decision-making, a failure to consult and bring colleagues with her, inadequate communication and the public mistreatment of colleagues" as reasons for the firing.

Abramson, the Times' first woman executive editor, was abruptly ousted on Wednesday in a decision that sparked a fire storm of commentary on women managers in the workplace. There was media speculation that her firing was linked to gender issues, including her reported complaint that she was not as well compensated as her male predecessor.

He denounced these as "persistent but incorrect reports".

Sulzberger said that "the saddest outcome" of his decision to remove Abramson was that it "has been cast by many as an example of the unequal treatment of women in the workplace". Instead, he said it was "a situation involving a specific individual who, as we all do, has strengths and weaknesses".

The New Yorker reported earlier this week that Abramson had confronted Times' executives after she discovered her pay and pension benefits were less than those of Bill Keller, whom she succeeded, citing an unidentified close associate of Abramson.

"This is untrue," Sulzberger said, adding that Abramson's package was more than 10 per cent higher that his in her last year as editor.

Sulzberger said "she had lost the support of her masthead colleagues and could not win it back", according to the Times.

Managing editor Dean Baquet, 57, a Pulitzer prize-winning reporter and former editor of the Los Angeles Times, became the paper's first African-American editor.

The shakeup is the latest sign of turmoil at the New York Times, which is controlled by the Ochs-Sulzberger family. It has been selling assets, cutting staff and looking for new revenue sources as print advertising revenue declines.

Ad Feedback

- Reuters

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content