FT claims errors mar economics best-seller

Last updated 11:20 27/05/2014
Thomas Piketty
UNDER FIRE: Thomas Piketty's book was published this year and gained quick popularity.

Relevant offers


"RIP VINE #GoneTooSoon": Fans reel at the news Twitter is shutting down Vine Samsung logs 17 per cent drop in profit after phone recall Tesla Motors surprises with first quarterly profit in three years Ardent to re-open Dreamworld for normal business on Saturday Snapchat planning to raise billions in IPO Ardent chief Deborah Thomas to face bonus scrutiny after Dreamworld accident Australia could soon be importing milk, dairy farmers warn amid $1 a litre war Dreamworld accident: Ardent Leisure's value shaved by $200m in wake of Dreamworld tragedy Apple posts its first revenue decline in 15 years as iPhone sales fall Taco Bell NZ: Expectations grow as Restaurant Brands buys 82 fast food stores in Hawaii

A best-selling book by a French economist on rising wealth inequality has come under fire after the Financial Times newspaper said that an investigation it carried out found a series of errors that skewed the author's findings.

The FT said it found mistakes and unexplained entries in the spreadsheets underpinning Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century.

The roughly 700-page book was published this year and gained quick popularity, hitting the top of the New York Times bestseller list in May.

Piketty has been travelling the world promoting his book, meeting with top officials such as US Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew, and earning the praise of decorated economists.

Piketty's work shows that wealth inequalities are heading back up to levels last seen before World War One. The FT said its investigation undercuts this claim and indicates there is little evidence in Piketty's original sources to bear out the thesis that an increasing share of total wealth is held by the richest few.

In response, Piketty told the FT: "I have no doubt that my historical data series can be improved and will be improved in the future ... but I would be very surprised if any of the substantive conclusion about the long-run evolution of wealth distributions was much affected by these improvements."

The newspaper's finding comes a little more than a year after another well-known economic research study came under attack for errors, which the authors later accepted responsibility for.

That controversy involved a 2010 study by Harvard economists Kenneth Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart, key parts of which were undone by a 28-year-old graduate student.

Piketty did not immediately reply to an email from Reuters seeking comment. 

Ad Feedback

- Reuters

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content