FT claims errors mar economics best-seller

Last updated 11:20 27/05/2014
Thomas Piketty
Reuters
UNDER FIRE: Thomas Piketty's book was published this year and gained quick popularity.

Relevant offers

World

Woman gets $8030 but fails in bid to sue Australian supermarket after slipping on a grape Kayak is letting travellers search for travel deals using emojis Uber CEO Travis Kalanick resigns under investor pressure George Clooney sells his tequila to Diageo for US$1 billion London fire: Luxury apartments acquired for displaced Grenfell tenants Aussie bankers drug colleague with valium and laxatives in attempt to discredit him Passengers set to pay as Uber introduces tipping and fees for keeping drivers waiting Bauer's Australia boss quits, replaced by New Zealand CEO, after Rebel Wilson defamation case Apple gives the iPad some love to halt its long slide Amazon is aiming to be the dressing room in your house

A best-selling book by a French economist on rising wealth inequality has come under fire after the Financial Times newspaper said that an investigation it carried out found a series of errors that skewed the author's findings.

The FT said it found mistakes and unexplained entries in the spreadsheets underpinning Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century.

The roughly 700-page book was published this year and gained quick popularity, hitting the top of the New York Times bestseller list in May.

Piketty has been travelling the world promoting his book, meeting with top officials such as US Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew, and earning the praise of decorated economists.

Piketty's work shows that wealth inequalities are heading back up to levels last seen before World War One. The FT said its investigation undercuts this claim and indicates there is little evidence in Piketty's original sources to bear out the thesis that an increasing share of total wealth is held by the richest few.

In response, Piketty told the FT: "I have no doubt that my historical data series can be improved and will be improved in the future ... but I would be very surprised if any of the substantive conclusion about the long-run evolution of wealth distributions was much affected by these improvements."

The newspaper's finding comes a little more than a year after another well-known economic research study came under attack for errors, which the authors later accepted responsibility for.

That controversy involved a 2010 study by Harvard economists Kenneth Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart, key parts of which were undone by a 28-year-old graduate student.

Piketty did not immediately reply to an email from Reuters seeking comment. 

Ad Feedback

- Reuters

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content