What is quantitative easing and will it help?

BRAD PLUMER
Last updated 11:29 14/09/2012

Related Links

Fed bets big to rescue US economy Kiwi consolidates morning gains Shares relinquish early gains

Relevant offers

World

Donald Trump fights Scottish wind farm Obama names temporary IRS head US tax chief fired over scandal Euro zone's downward spiral continues Clothing chains sign Bangladesh pact US fiscal deficit to shrink rapidly FBI to probe tax agency's actions Winners and losers in Australian budget China threatens survival of fishing industry LinkedIn looks to build on its impressive resume

The Federal Reserve has released a statement announcing a third round of "quantitative easing," or QE3, to stimulate the economy. So let's do a quick run through of what that means.

Q: What is quantitative easing?

A: Short answer: It's an unconventional monetary tool used by central banks to stimulate the economy.

Answer that might make sense: Normally, when there's a recession or the economy is limping along, the Federal Reserve will reduce short-term interest rates in order to spur more lending and spending. But right now, the Fed has cut interest rates as far as they can go and the economy is still struggling. This is known as the "zero bound." The Fed can't go any lower.

So, instead, the central bank can try quantitative easing. Since the Fed can just create dollars out of thin air, it can buy up assets like long-term Treasuries or mortgage-backed securities from commercial banks and other institutions. This pumps money into the US economy and reduces long-term interest rates further. When long-term interest rates go down, investors have more incentive to spend their money now. In theory.

Q: Hasn't the Fed already tried quantitative easing?

A: Yes. Twice in fact. In late November 2008, after the financial crisis hit, the Fed started buying up mortgage-backed securities and Treasury bills in order to boost the economy. By June 2010, the bank had bought about US$2.1 trillion (NZ$2.5t) worth of assets.

At this point, the Fed halted its actions, figuring that it had done enough. But when the economy started weakening that summer, Bernanke resumed the programme in August 2010, buying up another US$600 billion in assets in order to maintain the Fed's balance sheet. (Remember, the bank is holding a bunch of debt that slowly matures, so if the Fed does nothing, all that money it had injected into the economy will eventually get sucked back out again.) This was known as QE2.

Q: Did QE1 and QE2 actually boost the US economy?

A: Academics have been churning out plenty of research on this question. The first round of quantitative easing appeared to be effective in preventing the economy from sinking into a giant depression. Economists say this was because everyone realised the Fed would do whatever it takes to avoid deflation. It was essentially a giant confidence boost. The economy stopped sliding and inflation slowly rose. But the effects seemed to dwindle as the years went by. Experts are much more divided on how much QE2 has helped.

Ad Feedback

In theory, quantitative easing should work in two ways. First, it injects more cash into banks, allowing them to lend more. And second, it lowers interest rates - if the Fed buys up a bunch of mortgage-backed securities, for example, that should make it cheaper to borrow money to buy a house. In practice, interest rates do drop. But it's hard to figure out whether this translates into a boost in the actual economy. After all, low mortgage rates can only do so much if banks are scarred by the housing bubble and remain tightfisted about lending.

Q: How does quantitative easing help the economy?

A: In his testimony to Congress in June, Bernanke explained why QE3 might bolster the economy. It would reduce the cost of borrowing money for corporations, bring down mortgage rates even further and potentially boost the stock market, increasing wealth effects for consumers to spur more spending. (He did say, however, that he'd much prefer to have additional help from Congress.)

Not everyone's convinced, though. In early September, Michael Woodford, a preeminent monetary theorist at Columbia University, released a long paper arguing that more quantitative easing was likely to be ineffective - because Bernanke is acting too sporadically. The Fed will buy up US$600b worth of assets, hoping for a jolt, but people in the economy have no clear sense of what Bernanke's goals are. Does he want a certain level of inflation? Will he start hiking interest rates if the economy starts growing? If so, when? That level of uncertainty can be paralysing.

Q: Is there a way to make QE3 work better?

A: The Fed did two things to try to improve QE3. First, the central bank will keep short-term interest rates low until mid-2015. Second, it will buy up US$85 billion worth of assets each month between now and the end of the year. But, unlike QE1 or QE2, this new round of purchases will be more open-ended. That's an important change. Here's the key bit from the Fed statement: "If the outlook for the labour market does not improve substantially, the Committee will continue its purchases of agency mortgage-backed securities, undertake additional asset purchases, and employ its other policy tools as appropriate until such improvement is achieved"

The purchases will continue until morale improves. What's more, the Fed noted that it will continue its policy of easy money "for a considerable time after the economic recovery strengthens."

In essence, Bernanke is now taking Woodford's advice - or at least part of it. (Note that the Fed didn't set an explicit target for the economy, it left that vague.) The Fed's not just buying up a fixed quantity of assets and hoping that the economy lurches forward. It's saying that it will keep buying up assets and won't stop until things look better. Now we'll see if that actually shifts expectations and bolsters growth.

Washington Post

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content