Britain publishes names of "tax cheats"

Last updated 11:41 22/02/2013

Relevant offers

World

Snow geese deaths from mine pit number in the thousands Grandma's favourite stocking stuffer is 2016's most surprising popular Christmas gift Worried about your debts? Spare a thought for Gina Rinehart Yes women want to be chief executives, even when they have children Lego replaces long-time CEO with first foreign boss in organisational shake-up PewDiePie top the list of highest paid YouTube stars of 2016 Amazon opens line-free grocery store in the US as it looks to challenge supermarkets 'Sex is becoming a financial decision': Soaring Viagra prices in the US deflate older couples BMW forced to repay A$72m to car buyers it misled Trump warns of 'retribution' for US companies that offshore jobs

The UK's Revenue and Customs department has published the names of what it described as "tax cheats" for the first time, part of efforts to address public anger over tax evasion at a time of economic austerity.

Tax has become a sensitive issue in Britain as the government cuts spending to tackle a big budget deficit, and as more becomes known about legal loopholes firms such as Starbucks and Amazon use to sharply cut their tax bill.

The tax authority stressed that the list of individuals and businesses it had published only related to "deliberate" non-payment, not avoidance, which is legal but whose practice by some multinationals has raised public ire.

Prime Minister David Cameron earlier this week ruled out changing the law to ban "aggressive tax avoidance".

"The publication of these names sends a clear signal that cheating on tax is wrong and reassures people who pay their taxes - the vast majority - that there are consequences for those who refuse to (disclose) their full liability," Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury David Gauke said in a statement which described those named as "tax cheats".

The tax authority said the details of defaulters would be published on its website each quarter if the default would have resulted in a loss to the state of at least £25,000 (NZ$45,000) and after appeals have been exhausted.

Those named in the list included a hairdresser, a grocer and a knitwear manufacturer.

Ad Feedback

- Reuters

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content