'Fat-fingers' cause HSBC share spike

Last updated 07:00 31/01/2014

Relevant offers


Sue Finley, 80, was hired by Nasa in 1958 as a 'computer' Woman gets $8030 but fails in bid to sue Australian supermarket after slipping on a grape Kayak is letting travellers search for travel deals using emojis Uber CEO Travis Kalanick resigns under investor pressure George Clooney sells his tequila to Diageo for US$1 billion London fire: Luxury apartments acquired for displaced Grenfell tenants Aussie bankers drug colleague with valium and laxatives in attempt to discredit him Passengers set to pay as Uber introduces tipping and fees for keeping drivers waiting Bauer's Australia boss quits, replaced by New Zealand CEO, after Rebel Wilson defamation case Apple gives the iPad some love to halt its long slide

A trader may have lost about £400,000 ($810,560) in under 30 seconds on Thursday after causing a 10 per cent spike in the shares of Europe's biggest bank, HSBC, which traders blamed on human error - a "fat finger" trade.

The jump in the price - a seismic move in a company worth nearly 120 billion pounds - prompted a "circuit-breaker" to kick in and suspend HSBC shares from trading for five minutes, after which an orderly market in its shares resumed.

The London Stock Exchange said its trading system worked as it should to prevent it sparking a panic.

An LSE spokesman said the spike, which briefly flipped the entire FTSE 100 index into positive territory, had been investigated and no trades would be cancelled.

That would be unwelcome news for any fat-fingered trader sitting on a hefty loss.

Other traders said the person responsible may have input the wrong quantity of shares to buy or did not spread out the trade over a sufficiently long period of time for it to be absorbed by the market, and also probably failed to put in an upper price limit.

Trades are typically divided into small orders by complex algorithms to get a better price. But these programme trades can trigger other algorithm orders and have been criticised for exaggerating market moves.

"These things should never happen if it's done properly, that's why lots of controls are built into the systems.

But it may be the case that someone manually keyed in the algo and changed some of the configuration," a trader said.

"There are various scenarios on what could have gone wrong. But the good thing is people shouldn't do it, and so getting penalised for doing it (by losing money) means they won't do it again," he said.

The identity of the trader or company he or she worked for has not been revealed.

The flurry of action in HSBC shares was sparked at 1120 GMT and 17 seconds, with an order for 18,049 shares at 629.3 pence (1275.2 cents), near where the price was trading.

Hundreds more orders in smaller amounts followed and drove HSBC's share price to 650 pence within 12 seconds, and then as high as 688 pence within another 16 seconds. The shares were then suspended until 1126 GMT.

About 1.9 million shares traded during one minute. That could have lost the trader about 400,000 pounds for his "fat finger", based on an average price of 650 pence, though one trader said it was likely other orders were triggered by the original mistake so others may have shared that loss.

Algorithms - or what some have dubbed "the rise of the machine" - have been blamed for adding volatility and prompted exchanges and banks to increase controls, especially after a "flash crash" on Wall Street in May 2010, when the Dow fell more than 600 points in a matter of minutes, sparked by a large seller creating an imbalance in the market.

Ad Feedback

Other stocks hit by fat-finger trades include U.S. security software firm Symantec and American Electric Power last year.

HSBC declined to comment on the move. By 1608 GMT its shares were back at 630.7p, up a more modest 0.7 per cent on the day.

- Reuters

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content